misdirecetd
Standard Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2006
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
(When using a PC)
I am now pretty much spooked out of buying any LCD that does not have a VGA input.
I'm not sure I understand the science correctly, but it seems to me that it might be the case that where HDMI/DVI will create a badly recalculated version of any original image that does not match pixel for pixel, an analogue format like VGA is not represented as an exact or recalculated duplicate but effectively 'photographed' (for lack of a better term) to provide a soft 'representation' of the original image, rather than drastically recalculating it.
Am I in the right ballpark here? Also if I am asking a question that has been repeatedly covered, I apologise and would appreciate being directed to any relevant threads.
I am now pretty much spooked out of buying any LCD that does not have a VGA input.
I'm not sure I understand the science correctly, but it seems to me that it might be the case that where HDMI/DVI will create a badly recalculated version of any original image that does not match pixel for pixel, an analogue format like VGA is not represented as an exact or recalculated duplicate but effectively 'photographed' (for lack of a better term) to provide a soft 'representation' of the original image, rather than drastically recalculating it.
Am I in the right ballpark here? Also if I am asking a question that has been repeatedly covered, I apologise and would appreciate being directed to any relevant threads.