1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How to remove "PROOF" from a picture

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by agueybana79, Sep 20, 2006.

  1. agueybana79

    agueybana79 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Hey guys,

    A newbie to photo editing...I have a picture that I downloaded from a website which has the word PROOF lightly on top of it. Is there anyway to use Adobe Photoshop or GNU's The GIMP program to remove this? I have the picture and can provide it to anyone via email.

    I'd highly appreciate help with this. The picture is of me, and it's an excellent musical promo pic. :lease:

    Thanks.
     
  2. senu

    senu Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    19,347
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
    Ratings:
    +2,865
    Proof is usually an indication that the image is "owned" by whoever posted it until fully paid for.

    There are painstaking ways to remove it in PS but no automated ones..

    If the use is "innocent" there really shouldnt be any need to remove it as it simply indicates that whoever put it there owns its copyright .
    If it is of you why does it have proof on it?

    Perhaps if you took it and uploaded it to an image hosting website Proof is meant to protect you , in which case simply email the original via the pm system
     
  3. agueybana79

    agueybana79 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    The picture is OF me, but not taken BY me. For some weird reason, of the 82 pictures the photographer posted...2 of them had this "PROOF" marking on them. Can't figure it out myself.

    If it were my pictures from my camera, they wouldn't have PROOF on them.

    Can you please give me information on how to go about removing the PROOF marking on it? You mentioned there are some ways.
     
  4. HCking

    HCking Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2002
    Messages:
    804
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Sheffield.
    Ratings:
    +18
    Talk to the photographer and ask for a copy without proof on it.
     
  5. Radiohead

    Radiohead Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2001
    Messages:
    4,271
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Amazingstoke
    Ratings:
    +433
    Copyright is owned by the person who took it so you'll need to contact the snapper.
     
  6. ush flynn

    ush flynn Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,606
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Bromley
    Ratings:
    +129
    agree with radio head, you dont have the right to tamper with it... tut tut
     
  7. senu

    senu Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    19,347
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
    Ratings:
    +2,865
    Indeed . it is possible that he ( she?) percieves this particular picture to be of commercial ( or artistic value) and wishes to be credited for it :rotfl:
     
  8. Liquid101

    Liquid101 Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,366
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Aberystwyth
    Ratings:
    +2,068
    I agree with what the others guys say - The photographer owns the copyright.

    However, if he has made this photograph of you in a non-public space, and you have signed no image rights deal, or model release form, you may have the right to ask him to remove this photograph from the web. Of course, you could contact the photographer and come to some kind of deal.

    It would be helpful if we could see the photograph in context.

    HTH
     
  9. agueybana79

    agueybana79 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    here's the photograph in context.

    http://www.markamusic.net/rene/edited.png

    The weird thing is that of all the 80 pictures, only 2 had this...mine, and another one that seemed kinda insignificant. I don't understand why he didn't "PROOF" the other ones. And I think he got paid by the people hiring our band to take the photographs, so he was supposed to have sent them copies of the material. If he made the other 80 images viewable and downloadable on the internet, why proof 2 of them?

    That's why I was a little confused.

    Anyway, I'd appreciate the help from anyone in removing the PROOF marking, if possible.
     
  10. mr jones

    mr jones Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,041
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Location:
    (S)cumbria, UK
    Ratings:
    +22
    contact the photographer and talk to them, dont expect photographers to help you remove watermarks put on images, theres more than likely a reason for it


    it could depend on any contract you entered into with the promoter who hired the photographer
     
  11. Radiohead

    Radiohead Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2001
    Messages:
    4,271
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Amazingstoke
    Ratings:
    +433
    It's not your image to manipulate. You don't own the copyright so just contact the photographer.
     
  12. Messiah

    Messiah Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,419
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Ratings:
    +324
    It could be a simple case that he uploaded the wrong file for those 2 with PROOF markings. A simple phone call could sort it out and give you the premium quality image you're after rather than a manipulated one.
     
  13. agueybana79

    agueybana79 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    thanks guys. I'm sure the help offered here will result in my getting the quailty photo.

    See you around.
     
  14. SSB

    SSB Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,510
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    North Cumbria
    Ratings:
    +167
  15. Radiohead

    Radiohead Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2001
    Messages:
    4,271
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Amazingstoke
    Ratings:
    +433
  16. Messiah

    Messiah Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,419
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Ratings:
    +324
  17. Messiah

    Messiah Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,419
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Ratings:
    +324
    Snap :hiya:
     
  18. ufitsy

    ufitsy Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,925
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    Midlands
    Ratings:
    +267
  19. bowenjones

    bowenjones Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,770
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Wales
    Ratings:
    +432
  20. grantsteve

    grantsteve Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,402
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Ratings:
    +219
  21. Liquid101

    Liquid101 Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,366
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Aberystwyth
    Ratings:
    +2,068
    OK, I feel a little sorry for you agueybana - these guys are giving you no help at all.

    So anyway, i've removed the PROOF lettering for you. Unfortunately i've had to remove some other minor detail as well - nothing of consequence.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. ufitsy

    ufitsy Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,925
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    Midlands
    Ratings:
    +267
    Cool - could almost be a member of the Blue Man Group.
     
  23. senu

    senu Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    19,347
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Hillingdon /Hayes, Middx
    Ratings:
    +2,865
    check your pms:)
     
  24. SSB

    SSB Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,510
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    North Cumbria
    Ratings:
    +167
    :eek: :D
     

Share This Page

Loading...