There is a huge difference between blindingly supporting nay praising something (does anyone actually give SKYHD a 100% approval across the board?) and offering a balanced view based on what was offered by SKY before launch, the cost (without special deals to some readers) and how the system has developed in under a year.
I honestly do find it hard to accept people buy the whole HD package without really knowing what they are getting and as such I will never really post supporting messages for those who then complain over the lack of HD channels, upscale SD on HD channels etc etc especially when they can get their money back, it's not as if you can't get a good picture of the service in a week.
Another factor is simply that I am pretty happy with SKY HD. The STB is quiet and fairly bug free (don't give a toss about DD audio volume) and the FF/RW are manageable. Audio drop outs can be an issue at times but the most part my DD5.1 viewing is perfectly acceptable and Anytime works perfectly.
There are many genuine issues with SKY HD with both it's hardware and content, after a while certain complaints just seem to go on and on and well a year will soon be up and people can then match the words with deeds.
Maybe I am one of the people Neil was referring to maybe not but I don't white wash anything and I consider myself fairly balanced when it comes to offering opinion and advice on SKY HD.
Back on topic.
FX, full time HD channel with SD upscale and native HD or part time/looped native HD channel, place your bets