Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Mep, Aug 3, 2005.
Food for thought?
Interesting re-hash of old material. Pretty convincing though if you are looking for a conspiracy!
thats was brilliant, gets you thinking
Wow. Certainly made me think. Nothing adds up and you can see the point of view regarding the lack or wreckage!
Whilst it is concievable that the aircraft was airborne until the point of contact with the building, not the lawn, there does seem to be a lack of wings.
This theory was originally proposed by a french journo who had never visited the site. This is his take on the subject:
Presumably a plane carrying many people did crash? If it didn't crash into the Pentagon, what happened to it?
More info Here
Love it, this report got the year wrong!
I never realised there were any conspiracy theories about 911 until I saw this, then you search for it in Google and there are hundreds of sites out there devoted to it !
I must admit, the damage done at the pentagon did seem strange for a big aircraft like that to have caused it.
A couple of other sites refuting the conspiracy theory (just for balance!)
Although some of the onward links don't seem to work - more conspiracy maybe??
theres a book i'd recommend you all on this subject, called The New Pearl Harbour, written by Ray Griffin book (there is a second edition out), its quite heavy reading, very detailed but well worth a read...
Separate names with a comma.