Just saw this: http://www.totaldvd.net/cgi-bin/displaynews.php?id=4293 I'm used to lazy reviewers making vague claims for the benefits of DTS over DD5.1 but this is just ridiculous. For this sort of thing to be useful, we need "timestamps" so we can try to hear the differences for ourselves. Most reviewers notice only subtle differences, but in this round-up DTS often gets 2 or more marks out of 10 for audio. Thats implying there is a 20% improvement in some cases! Bonkers... Any thoughts?