Does a much bigger screen size worsen picture quality?

Discussion in 'General TV Discussions Forum' started by tyrone burton, Aug 11, 2012.

  1. tyrone burton

    tyrone burton

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,193
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Ratings:
    +105
    Whilst looking around the Internet I hear people talking how bigger screen sizes can affect the image onscreen, especially with video games , is this true? And if it is what is the recommended screen size for all round content?.
     
  2. Quaddy

    Quaddy
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,878
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Ratings:
    +300
    yes it does, most noticeable with SD material because you are ultimately stretching an image up to a given screen size, 42" is a good happy medium, i know that was the kind of defacto size for taking advantage of HD, but even going from my 20" monitor on my pc, recently, to a 32" hdtv as monitor, SD stuff looks worse

    and comparing say SD BBC news channel on the 42" in the corner to the 104" screen in the middle of the room is quite an adjustment

    i guess it's akin to keeping on zooming in on a photo
     
  3. tyrone burton

    tyrone burton

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,193
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Ratings:
    +105
    What about seating distance, if you sat a distance that was recommended, would the image be more.....proper?
     
  4. Quaddy

    Quaddy
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,878
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Ratings:
    +300
    yes, absolutely, that would certainly aid things, its a kind of catch 22, you get a massive screen, and i suppose you dont want to back off too much, so that you are immersed, it doesnt matter quite as much with HD, as it scales more 'losslessly' -with HD you get into more of recommended viewing to take advantage of the resolution, wheareas with SD, its a kind of back off so you arent as aware of artifact and low res.
     
  5. tyrone burton

    tyrone burton

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,193
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Ratings:
    +105
    Well, I'll hopefully be getting an upgrade near Christmas, so I think I should measure my room and then decide what size tv to get,I'll then do some research on the seating distance of that size.
     
  6. scottthehat

    scottthehat
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    11,160
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    honiton
    Ratings:
    +2,801
    i think this comes down to the quality of the tv and how good a job it does,my 59" looks no worse then my 42" lcd infact the picture quality of the 59" is just awsome and sd stuff looks as good as on my smaller tvs.
     
  7. cune

    cune
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +1
    There is no quality loss at all (tehnicly speaking).
    If you compare 2 TV's of same model one 32" and other 60" and play same the file on both picture will be the same.
    Picture will be equally stretched on both TV's as they both have the same resolution and same number of pixels.
    Only difference is the bigger the TV the bigger the pixel is.
    Just keep size of TV in proportion with viewing distance and you wont notice any difference.
     
  8. tyrone burton

    tyrone burton

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,193
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Ratings:
    +105
    That's it then, job done, if you get a big tv and think the picture is off compared to that nice looking 22 inch tv, just sit a bit further back and voila, let your eyes do the rest.
     
  9. spikecast

    spikecast
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,138
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Guisborough
    Ratings:
    +685
    Having upgraded from a 40" 2 year old to a 47" LG I would honestly say the LG quality was a big upgrade. I expected the 47" to look worse but once you set up correctly it looked a hell of a lot better. :thumbsup:
     
  10. TW ALBIEE

    TW ALBIEE
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Hornsea
    Ratings:
    +199
    I look at it like engines and cars, a mondeo and a Mercedes are both effectively saloon cars but it all about what's powering it. You get what you pay for at the end of the day, my Pio 5090 is better than any of my smaller screens in the house and any distance and proper isf calibrated levels will render almost obselete any poor sd material. It's still there but once you are at d65 standard it is not over emphasised by poor contrast and brightness levels.
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice