1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do I go for good contrast ratio or good pixellisation??

Discussion in 'Plasma TVs' started by Cag, Jan 9, 2004.

  1. Cag

    Cag
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Ratings:
    +9
    Which one should I go for for Sky PQ. Panny or Tosh

    Thanks
    Cag
     
  2. MR2Harvey

    MR2Harvey
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Messages:
    460
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +6
    Which models of each, SD or HD?

    Panny HD would be a good option.
     
  3. Cag

    Cag
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Ratings:
    +9
    Cost wise I'm thinking £2500-3000 ish. What will that get me??
     
  4. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,082
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +412
    The only hi res that'll get you is Hitachi.
     
  5. Jasonjo

    Jasonjo
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2001
    Messages:
    2,649
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    UK
    Ratings:
    +112
    SD Panny then ;)

    42PWD6 (black) or 42PW6 (silver)

    Tosh's are normally rebadged Panny's anyhow...

    JJ
     
  6. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,082
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +412
    42 tosh is still panny, but 5 series still, unless anyone can correct me. Other to consider, but at the top of your price range is new fuji VHA30, panny 7 series glass, 2 yr warranty.
     
  7. Cag

    Cag
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Ratings:
    +9
    Is the Fuji the dogs Boll as it has higher contrast ratio & high pixellisation?
     
  8. MR2Harvey

    MR2Harvey
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Messages:
    460
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +6
    I think the new Fuji VHA30 is still a low res screen but has the latest and greatest contrast from the new Panny 7 glass. If you don't want to go for an ALiS screen then I would seriously consider the HD Panny at about £3700-£3800 it's about as cheap as you can get a non ALiS high res screen for. Oh and it's a good one by all accounts.
     
  9. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,082
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +412
    The VHA is low res but very fine in all other respects, especially that warranty!!! Hi res panny way more than the Pioneer MXE, another XGA screen, but still well over £3k. 3 choices then. increase budget, low res, high contrast, or Alis. Hard choices, at the low £2k's a PMA could be very tempting. Remember that new screens are a small incremental improvement over previous, no massive quantum leaps any more. No, not even HDMI HDE pioneers. PC users have had pictures better than that for ages. The only reason I suggest the VHA is not cos it's the latest and greatest, but cos of the brill. warranty. Look for horror threads on other warranties, and they'll be there. The scart input on the VHA is exceptionall good though, hard to tell scart from JS VGA box. Overall, it might just be better than a panny6, but I'd not swear to it.
     
  10. Cag

    Cag
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Ratings:
    +9
    Sorry I initially put pixellisation when I meant to put resolution but I have edited it.
     
  11. Liam @ Prog AV

    Liam @ Prog AV
    Well-known Member AVForums Sponsor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,498
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Kent
    Ratings:
    +827
    If resolution is your thing the NEC 42XM2 is only about £3200 and is a very good bit of kit (once you've added all your terminal options to the SD Panny the price isn't far off, you lose contrast but gain XGA resolution if you take the NEC route). Maybe worth an audition...
     
  12. Cag

    Cag
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Ratings:
    +9
    To be honest Liam I'm not sure which one I want!! Just want one that will give a good Sky picture especially with the sports & terrestrial channels.
    Any suggestions?? Budget £2-3.5k
     
  13. Liam @ Prog AV

    Liam @ Prog AV
    Well-known Member AVForums Sponsor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,498
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Kent
    Ratings:
    +827
    I would hold off to see how the new Fuji VHA fares. Not sure about this whole Panny 7th gen glass thing, but either way it will have a whole host of connections as standard, and uses the latest Faroudja processing. It doesn't sound like you really need to worry about higher resolution models.
     

Share This Page

Loading...