Was out with the kids today up on the hills with our puppy - taking a few snaps as you do when you get the chance.. Came back to the car and popped the dog in the boot (it's an estate - so don't panic) and took the kids to the loo and got them a drink each from the little van there that sells bit's and bob's. Came back to find the drivers side back window smashed with a brick and my camera bag gone.. And in a quite busy carpark noone saw a thing - We'd only been gone 5-10 minutes and I know it was hidden under a pile of coats int footwell because I'm paranoid about hiding the bag. Anyway - rant over. I'm 99% sure I'm insured for my camera (An old canon 10D) and the kit lens, a sigma 50mm macro and a nasty canon 100-300 zoom - oh and the backpack. I'm not sure which might be the best replacement though. I am sure that it will be new for old, although another 10D would be fine by me.. BUT if I am given the choice which would be the sensible choice for a total beginner like me? 30D or 400D - Pros and cons please?