Confusion over 1024x768 resolution and HDTV

Discussion in 'Plasma TVs Forum' started by ollie501, Mar 14, 2006.

  1. ollie501

    ollie501
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,007
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    Ratings:
    +25
    Hi,

    Looking at the requirements for HDTV, I found this info on AVF...

    • HD capable inputs accept the following HD video formats:
    o 1280x720 @ 50 and 60Hz progressive (“720p”), and
    o 1920x1080 @ 50 and 60Hz interlaced (“1080i”)

    Ok, so if I go for the new Pioneer PDP-436RXE which has a resolution of 1024x768 am I wasting money that would be better invested in a set capable of a higher resolution? Surely a set with only 1024x768 is just going to downscale everything, not that I really understand downscaling either.

    What is the benefit, or indeed point, of a panel that has a higher resolution? There are sets with 1366x768 and 1920x1080... how much difference is that going to make? I don't really understand the difference in vertical resolution at all, since the 720/1080 stuff is horizontal isn't it?

    How will 1080p be affected on a set of 1024x768? To say I am confused is an understatement, so answers in idiot-speak would be greatly appreciated.. :lease:

    Thanks

    Ollie
     
  2. vince31

    vince31
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    139
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Swindon
    Ratings:
    +13
    the 720/1080 refer to the number of Horizontal lines which is actually the vertical resolution (720 lines stack up to a vertical resolution of 720).

    From what I have read in many of these forums, dont get hung up on the number of lines a panel has (Horizontal or Vertical) it does not necissarily mean a better picture. There are many more variables with a greater impact such as build quality and the picture processing electronics. Im sure that the best advice is to see the panels in the flesh for yourself showing the material that you want to view (be that HD or SD or whatever). Choose a panel on what looks best to you within your chosen budget. I know we all like to analyse the specs and be sure we get the best for our money but there is really nothing better than seeing it for yourself.

    Hope this helps.
     
  3. Koing

    Koing
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    You simply won't see as much detail on a 1024x768 as compared to a 1280x720 display.

    HOW much of a difference is to how picky you are. 480 looks pretty good on a good 42" plasma screen imo. But when more 720p stuff appears it won't show the full resolution and thus the detail that is inherent in the video.

    Go take a look but most 42" plasma screens aren't full 720p. They can display it but they downscale it.

    Koing
     
  4. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,103
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +411
    There is no such thing as a native 1280/720 plasma of any size. And even if there were, due to a desirable feature, (in limited and correct amount) we call 'overscan' it would not actually match the 1280/720 video signal anyway, but would have to enlarge the image so a few lines all round could be 'off screen' to avoid the frequent junk around the edge of the picture. So be happy with 1024/768, it's perfectly fine for HD, you will never know the difference.
     
  5. ChildOfRarn

    ChildOfRarn
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    349
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Chatham, Kent
    Ratings:
    +126
    MAW

    You say
    Yet in
    THIS THREAD
    you say
    Can you please clarify whether the Pioneer's 2.5% overscan (assuming the 436RXE is the same in this respect to my 436XDE) is desirable or pants.

    Trevor
     
  6. Nick_UK

    Nick_UK
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,748
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Ratings:
    +270
    Connsidering the variety of inputs (1080i, 720p, 576, 480 and possibly PC formats too), then it is inevitably going to do some scaling, because it's impossible to map pixels 1 for 1 on a range of different inputs. If I were to be buying a new plasma screen, the number of screen pixels would have to be a consideration, but I would also be looking very closely at how well the display copes with the scaling, because some don't do it at all well.
     
  7. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,103
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +411
    Trevor, there is no actual contradiction, overscan is both a good and bad thing. The XDE has too much, IMHO, much less is needed with HD, it's a cleaner signal. My own setup has about 1%. The whole business is pants, was what I meant, ie it's not actually possible at all, to have pixel matched video, it just does not work. Overscan is unfortunately needed, any 'native res' panel is going to have to have some overscan. My correction is built into my scaler, not my plasma, which is pixel mapped to the scaler output. I then resize the picture with the scaler controls to give the desired result, no edge junk and scaler doing the work. it's not very clear, sorry. And if your Pioneer only overscans by 2.5% you are lucky BTW. 5% is more typical.
     
  8. BeeWee

    BeeWee
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm confused by this format to. Does anyone know WHY they created this resolution of plasma screens? What is good about 1024 x 768 compared to the 'specified' 1280 x 720? Besides being cheaper to produce.
     
  9. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,103
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +411
    They were created as PC monitors 1st, and that's the way it's gone forward. And for reasons as above, there's little or nothing to choose between a full video res screen and any other format with enough pixels. The latest generation of 50" panels look like being 1920/1080, for all the good it will do. More pixels is better, but only provided you have enough info to display on them. They could be poor with SD video, we'll have to wait and see. Have you seen the Sharp 45" with sky? It's not pretty.
     
  10. magrillz

    magrillz
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    141
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +11
    I was wondering about this too. Basically if my Panny PV500 has a resioltution of 1024 X 768 does that mean I will only be able to display a max of 720P.

    I know that the number refers to pixels but does this also equate to the hdmi 720P standard.

    Not to bothered if thats all as I know both 720p and 1080 i will have benefits, just wondered.

    Cheers
     
  11. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,103
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +411
    Your set will make a decent job of squeezing 1080i lines into it's 768 vertical resolution. Both 720 and 1080 will fill the screen vertically, unless it's a movie, when they might not.
     
  12. Seek

    Seek
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    i have spent many of hours researching this problem when and about 4 weeks after i had got my new TV.

    and i came up with that if you can tell the difference between the 436xde(1024x768) and the 506xde (1274x768) both running the same HD film from the same PC/360 you will have expert eye's.

    you really can not notice the difference at all.
     
  13. boksbox

    boksbox
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    674
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Chelmsford
    Ratings:
    +93
    Yes I've seen the Sharp 45" showing Sky in John Lewis in Oxford St, it had a price tag above 5K when I saw it, the picture was so bad I did wonder who on earth woould buy one, there must be a large enough pool of punters who just want a nice flat screen not caring about the picture quality or price.
     
  14. MAW

    MAW
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,103
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Nr Dorking
    Ratings:
    +411
    Amazingly there are a lot of people like that. The Sharp looks teriffic with Euro1080i, but it still overscans, therefore scaling the image up to make it 'more than fit'.
     

Share This Page

Loading...