1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Component or Upscaleing which one is the best

Discussion in 'Blu-ray & DVD Players & Recorders' started by 5timeswinners, Oct 15, 2005.

  1. 5timeswinners

    5timeswinners
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    16
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Southport
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hi Guys
    Don't know a lot about this subject. Is there much difference between a dvd player that has component progressive scan output or the newer upscaling dvd's. I need to make a choice as i want to buy an all in one surround sound system. The Samsung Ht-p1200 is an upscaling player with surround sound but is £1000.00, whereas a good progressive scan player with surround sound is half the price. Is the price difference justified.
    Thanks
     
  2. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    NO! It may look worse.

    Upscaling is largely hype, wait 'til true HD gets here and spend your money on that...PJ
     
  3. Fluffy-Bunny

    Fluffy-Bunny
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Can upscaling via 720P HDMI ever look better than 480P component then?
     
  4. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    If you get a DVD player who's scaler is better than the scaler in the display then theoretically yes.

    What bugs me most about upscalers is the hype that you are somehow getting more information/definition for your money - all you are doing is shifting the work from the display to the player...PJ
     
  5. dmjohnson123

    dmjohnson123
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    265
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Wetherby near Leeds
    Ratings:
    +5
    I wouldn't disagree with anything PJTX100 has said above. I would add though that the end result can depend upon what your display is happiest being fed.

    My Z3 projector handles a component signal poorly (IMHO). It much prefers the HDMI signal from my Sammy HD850 player.

    I'm not saying the Sammy 850 is the best DVD player in the world but matched with my Z3 the end result is nothing short of stunning :clap:

    If you can try before you buy, or demo the DVD player in a shop using your TV I'd recommend it.

    Hope I've made my point well :lesson:
     
  6. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    Yes, your point is very valid. :thumbsup:

    I'm not saying that upscaling in the DVD player will never produce good images, I'm only saying don't be surprised if things aren't quite as good as you hoped for. The Z3 does seem to be particularly suitable for upscalers.

    That said I think the Oppo does a fine job too and that is my player of choice using its inbuilt scaler. I just want people to know the facts rather than the hype...PJ
     
  7. Fluffy-Bunny

    Fluffy-Bunny
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    What are the chances of my Panasonic S97 doing a good job of upscaling on a AE700 or a AE900 say for instance?
     
  8. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    S97 has a good reputation. If it looks better at 720p then great, if not revert back to 576/480 and put it down to experience. Even at 576/480 the removal of D->A->D stages may make the expense seem worthwhile...PJ
     
  9. Timbo21

    Timbo21
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,470
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +263
    PJ, I completely agree. Displays & hi-res TV's have been doing this for a while now. Why is it so amazing that the DVD player is now doing it? They are using it to fool people they are getting some sort of new hi-def images from SD.

    T.
     
  10. Kazman

    Kazman
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,252
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Luton, Bedfordshire
    Ratings:
    +136
    Depends on the DVD player too, mid to high end DVD players also have other image processing trickery they apply to the upscaled image, the 720p upscaled image from my DV7600 is visibly better than that displayed at 576p and the Sagem upscaling it to 720p.

    It all depends on how much you want to spend I guess. The likes of the Denon 3910/2910 and their 2.5K monster as well as the Marantz DV7600/DV9500 all give fabulous pictures.

    I very much doubt the cheaper budget models have decent scalers built into them, hence many of them looking poor.

    It goes back to the saying "You gets whats you pay for" ;)

    Just my opinion of course :)
     
  11. Joe Fernand

    Joe Fernand
    Distinguished Member AVForums Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2002
    Messages:
    23,805
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    The Borders
    Ratings:
    +2,471
    5timewinners

    Both the DVD players you are considering offer Progressive Scan processing on Component 'YUV' video Outputs - one with Video Up-conversion and one not; if that was the only difference between the two systems then it would be relatively simple to view them side by side with your chosen Display and decide if the Up-conversion was worth paying extra for or not.

    I'm guessing that in an 'all-in-one' system retailing at 1k the Video Up-conversion will be fairly rudimentary and on its own would not justify a +£500 spend over the other system you are considering; there must be more differences in the two systems!

    Best regards

    Joe

    PS You don't say what TV/Display you have and if it can take 'advantage' of the Video Up-conversion or not :)
     

Share This Page

Loading...