Same here a modern setting would have been way more appreciated tbh, plenty to go on. As long as it's not futuristic garbage though owt is better. It's not defo confirmed though WW2 but we have already had WAW so why do another similar? Is it down to the success of BF1, although they have allegedly been developing this for 3 years, so I am expecting it to be brilliant, but it probably won't be.Very happy with them going back to basics so to speak but I would much prefer a more modern day setting with boots on the ground.
Would love a game based around the Iraq/Ahgan wars, you could spread some missions in to places like Yeman, North Korea,Russia ect.
Back conpat had many other advantages than just BO2Nope, BLOPS 2 was terrible.
I know your not chalks. You on to the next big thing and like new hardware / games. You've said before old games don't interest you. All good.I'm sure it does to some. Not me. No real interest in it tbh.
I'm not dismissing it as a feature, it's great. Esp for those who like to go back.I know your not chalks. You on to the next big thing and like new hardware / games. You've said before old games don't interest you. All good.
Me I do too, love shiny, but being able to play my old games now and then (BO2, DS, etc.) since XB started back conpat had been great. I don't go back that often but it's nice to be able and have the option [emoji4]
Just think it can't be dismissed cos of a particular game or personal preference.
They need to convince me about this.Looks a little like Destiny when he described that Headquarters part of multiplayer. We only seen a small bit of it but looked like lots of players walking around one area.