I've been pretty pleased with my NAD C370 amp and Marantz CD6000 OSE CD player. It's fully run in now and out of interest i thought i would compare it to my old Toshiba SD210 DVD-player. And to my horror i could bassicly tell no difference. I thought the gap would be considerable. If anything the dvd player was more 'full' sounding but MAYBE a tiny bit less airy and ambiant. It even seemed more bassy. Is this normal?! I'm now wondering if it's faulty. Or is it just that the difference between players is so miniscule that it's hard to tell? What exactly is supposed to be better, is there supposed to be an IMIDIETE noticible difference? Right now i find that having spent £250 on a dedicated cd player has been a bit futile. Thanks.