Mysticpuma
Active Member
Now I'l be honest, I would love to buy a 65mm lens, but for practicality just can't justify the price as I need a portrait lens too and the 100mm f2.8 Macro will do this job perfectly.
So, in a previous life I used a Nikon 105mm and although I could get in close, I was still disappointed as I even though I could count a Spider's eyes, I could get nowhere near those great shots where you can see the pattern on the eyes of a fly.
So going with the fact that I will be getting a 100mm f2.8 macro, can I realistically expect to get in as close to 2x-3x life-size on the sensor using tubes or a doubler?
If I can, what combination would work well?
Cheers, MP
PS. I really would love the 65mm....maybe one-day I will, but for now it has to be the 100mm. Cheers.
So, in a previous life I used a Nikon 105mm and although I could get in close, I was still disappointed as I even though I could count a Spider's eyes, I could get nowhere near those great shots where you can see the pattern on the eyes of a fly.
So going with the fact that I will be getting a 100mm f2.8 macro, can I realistically expect to get in as close to 2x-3x life-size on the sensor using tubes or a doubler?
If I can, what combination would work well?
Cheers, MP
PS. I really would love the 65mm....maybe one-day I will, but for now it has to be the 100mm. Cheers.