D
Deleted member 507786
Guest
Thanks!
Good to know they can't get much better than our TVs though.Hope we se closer to 1000nits next year its needed badly
Yes I would take a 650 nits Oled over a 2000 nit led/lcd set as well. But I would also take a 1000 nit Oled over a 650 nits Oled if there was one available, and I think most people would tooAll this NITS talk is ridiculous!! IMO.
For years chasing a perfect black canvas has been viewed as the main objective by all video enthusiasts. Then when Samsung lost on OLED Tech battle to LG 3 years ago all of a sudden reaching 1000 nits was the 'must have' spec.
This is why you have 'nano crystal', 'SUHD' and 'QLED' with terrible night bleed from the sides and bottom of the screen and 'Slim backlight drives' that drive screen edges dangerously hot and illuminate BLACK! borders of letterbox movies!
LED seems to have reached its (affordable) limit with the DX902 and ZD9 with no improvements coming in 2017 from any brand.
Give me an OLED with 650nits over an Edge lit LED 2000nit anyday
a 600 nit circle looks brighter on a black background then a grey one so nits talk is pointless unless comparing scene by scene.
Yes I would take a 650 nits Oled over a 2000 nit led/lcd set as well. But I would also take a 1000 nit Oled over a 650 nits Oled if there was one available, and I think most people would too
1000 is the unicorn Oled nits goal. It holding me slight back on the urge on a 2017 Oled tv
To be fair, you can correct out-of-the-box accuracy, but there is no adding additional nits above what the panel is capable of.when a TV that cost £1000+ only gets a 7/10 accuracy out of the box there is a problem in my opinion. Id prefer 9/10+ rather than more nits.