Where have I disputed the story? My post said;You are disputing the story because of the source.
You've defended Corbyn by trying to dismiss the accusations against him due to where they come from. It's straight up ad hominem.
In what world are you not defending Corbyn?
Simply, I have no idea why he went where he did, and I’m not defending him doing it.I’m not defending his actions (I have no idea what his intention was), and he is a liability for his Party
I then suggested that neither CUFI nor Guido would be an entirely unbiased source reporting, and the only evidence presented was Corbyn trying to keep his expenses cost below a threshold. The fact that you and others then queue up to accuse me of being supportive of a terrorist sympathiser and his actions just shows how you can’t suggest that people maybe read the facts presented on here if it involves Corbyn.