He got off at the end, as recorded documents were found of staging the whole crime (they faked garrett murdered that woman). Later Garrett let the name of the girl slip to a lady friend before he was due to be paroled. She said the name of the victim was never given out in the media, so he must of know her and killed her.
Someone phoned the authorites. He was later taken back to his cell. So im not sure who the woman was he let the name slip too, but how did she know the name, and secondly my point, there is less evidence now for a second trial.
The investigator found the murdered woman had been called something else before she too a stage name and she also been seeing some one that roughed her up not Garrett but the guy had been dead for some years , Garrett let slip her name to his fiancé. When asked he said he must have read it but as they just found out how could he have know.
He than blabbed the whole story he been married to her years before an she was suppose to get a divorce but never did. But when Garrett's book was published came after him for more money.
Garrett slipped up and should have said it was his fiancé father that had done some research and found the woman's other name, which could neither or proved or disproved.
was there faults on the film when you watched it there was a few scenes where there was print faults and I'm sure a couple of scenes the frames seemed to be missing and sentences where cut short.