Simple, it's not good. I think this comes down to me being spoiled by the Call of duty.
"woeful" is a bit harsh. I really enjoyed the single player campaign, there's plenty to do, and lots of variety in the missions. I couldn't fault the gameplay, graphics, audio, etc. Perhaps the campaign could have been longer but unfortunately I think it's on a par with most FPS games these days.Do we praise the game for its incredible multiplayer or mark it down for its woeful campaign? There are those who would posit the opinion that the campaign shouldn't affect the score because most people who buy this game won't play it anyway and instead will spend all their time in the multiplayer.
Incorrect. DICE said they were only looking for market share. BF3 was never intended to be a "COD beater".The answer is, of course, that Battlefield 3 was supposed to bring down CoD