Artico PDP-42-H Plasma

Discussion in 'Plasma TVs Forum' started by Pugwash, Mar 7, 2003.

  1. Pugwash

    Pugwash
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Bolton
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have recently been offered one of these screens and wondered if anyone had any information.

    The screen is been offered by a company called itac multimedia.

    From the spec it looks like a screen that has been mentioned on this forum before called a Mitac PDP-42-S.

    The spec is as follows for the Artico PDP-42-H.

    42” Plasma screen
    -852 x 480 resolution
    -16:9 Aspect ratio
    -852 x 480 physical pixels
    -Contrast Ratio 800:1 max.
    -Quiet fanless operation
    -16,770,000 Colours
    -590 cd/m2
    -TV Tuner
    -Full Fastext ( For PAL SECAM ) Max 100 pages
    -Advanced multi-window viewing
    -Picture in picture (PIP in PC only) with nine selectable window position
    -Aspect Ratio : 16:9
    -Dual HD component video inputs
    -Automatic frequency detection
    -Built in amplifier / speakers
    -Multi variable audio output
    -Advanced Motion Digital Processor
    -Digital Progressive Line Scaling
    -3:2 Pull-Down for Film Scan Conversion
    -Digital 3D Comb Filter (NTSC)
    -PC monitor support up to 1280 x 1024
    -High quality RGB video input
    -DVI digital interface for PC applications
    -Full function remote control
    -RS-232 interface functionality
    -Multi Language OSD
    -480i, 480p, 720i, 1080p

    As I know very little about Plasma's, can anyone comment on how this compares with the Samsung and LG -17 plasma available to Richer sounds.

    To me the brightness looks a bit low
     
  2. Pugwash

    Pugwash
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Bolton
    Ratings:
    +0
    Can I assume that nobody has heard of this Plasma and because of that I should stay well clear of it.
     
  3. Costas

    Costas
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,663
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Swindon, UK
    Ratings:
    +120
    I do not know if I am missing someting here, but if the screen is capable of 852 x 480 resolution, how can they then claim 1280 x 1024 PC support?
     
  4. Gordon @ Convergent AV

    Gordon @ Convergent AV
    Distinguished Member AVForums Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    14,207
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Living in Surrey, covering UK!
    Ratings:
    +3,042
    They claim it because it downscales the incoming signal. IE They claim 720P and 1080i but that's outside it's native pixel count too....

    Sorry I cannot be more helpful. Never seen one.

    Gordon
     
  5. NonPayingMember

    NonPayingMember
    Previously Liam @ Prog AV

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,523
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Kent
    Ratings:
    +830
    If it's a MiTAC (which I guess it is) then it was based on Samsung glass but with built in speakers and progressive scan. Now its changed up to a 1200:1 screen (still with built in speakers and progressive scan but not Samsung glass) I can honestly say it's quite good!

    It's no Panasonic though, more like an LG with a decent tuner and good set of features/inputs and a competitive price. I think it's worth making the effort to go and see one anyway.
     
  6. Pugwash

    Pugwash
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Bolton
    Ratings:
    +0
    Thanks for the info Liam. The Plasma I've been offered is the 800:1 screen. I see from your website that the MiTAC screen has been uprated to 1200:1 from March 2003.

    This is probably why the screen has been rebadged and was offered to me for £2100.

    The decision now is Plasma or deposit on the Nissan 350Z :D
     
  7. loonatic

    loonatic
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,925
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Location:
    Springwell Village, Gateshead
    Ratings:
    +16
    Can't help with any info on the Plasma :(

    But go for the 350Z...you'll have much more fun :smashin:

    Cheers, Lee
     
  8. NonPayingMember

    NonPayingMember
    Previously Liam @ Prog AV

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,523
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Kent
    Ratings:
    +830
    Yeah i'm thinking you should go for the 350Z too!
     
  9. gringottsdirect

    gringottsdirect
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    2,906
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    50 Rue St Georges, Paris.
    Ratings:
    +32
    Forget the plasma, 350Z !!! :smashin:
     
  10. Pugwash

    Pugwash
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    26
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Bolton
    Ratings:
    +0
    350Z and another year of a ten year old TV it is then.
    :devil:
     
  11. lloydo

    lloydo
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    75
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Ratings:
    +0
    Mazda RX-8 and Plasma, the RX-8 is a bargain!
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice