Article: What does 2018 hold for Music Streaming Services?

Discussion in 'Music & Music Streaming Services' started by Ed Selley, Mar 7, 2018.


    1. Ed Selley

      Ed Selley
      AVF Reviewer

      Joined:
      Jun 26, 2003
      Messages:
      11,195
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,667
      • Thanks Thanks x 8
      • Useful Useful x 2
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    2. StanleyKubrick

      StanleyKubrick
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Mar 3, 2018
      Messages:
      219
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      Kent
      Ratings:
      +149
      Interesting article, thank you Ed.
      I'm in my elder years and as a music lover who listens daily (yes I still listen at night with the zombie box turned off) I thought I'd try different streaming services (Amazon/Apple/Spotify) and without doubt in my honest opinion Spotify wins hands down for ease of use, quality and uses very little bandwidth even at high bit rate. I hear Spotify are testing Higher Bit Rates but to be honest when I stream 320kbps on Spotify it sounds fine for the most part, if it's an album I have on hard drive in 16 or 24 bit I switch to that, however that's rare nowadays.
      One thing that I love about it, is it links to similar types of genres and I have now found artists I would of never found without it.
      I will be absolutely gutted if I lose it.
      FOOT NOTE: Another hurdle for music streaming is a certain demographic 'listens' to music via Y**T*** and obviously that's free. I searched once for a rare bootleg 12'' single years ago and there it was, nowadays I don't think there isn't a single track/album that's not available on Y**T***, how they get away with it is truly amazing, and also I never hear one record label or artist mention Y**T***.
       
      Last edited: Mar 7, 2018
    3. humanfish

      humanfish
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 26, 2007
      Messages:
      3,373
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      South East
      Ratings:
      +881
      A very interesting read.
       
    4. Kotatsu Neko

      Kotatsu Neko
      Member

      Joined:
      Aug 4, 2006
      Messages:
      925
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Leamington Spa
      Ratings:
      +715
      The elephant in the room is YouTube. It's huge, it has most music on it, and it's free. Quality counts for nothing when the cost is £0. Where I work most people listen to music all day and I'd say the split is about 50% YT and 50% Spotify.

      I'm not a huge music guy but I do subscribe to Spotify. It's fine for my needs, but I'm exactly a very discerning music listener. Most of the music I listen to is old and is through headphones (Bose QC35). I used to listen to a lot of movie soundtracks too which would probably benefit from higher quality audio, but I do less of that now as to be frank virtually all modern movie soundtracks are garbage.
       
    5. StephaneBosman

      StephaneBosman
      Member

      Joined:
      Aug 17, 2017
      Messages:
      70
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      11
      Location:
      Muxembourg
      Ratings:
      +23
      The reason the music industry has stuck with the CD format is that it is very good indeed. Sony and Philips did an extraordinary job and produced a format that still is practical and plenty good enough if produced competently.

      MP3, AAC, whatever, it is good but we do hear the loss at home. We have a Spotify family account and are very happy with it, but for the relatively few pieces we really love we purchase either the CD or the vinyl. We used to buy FLAC high-res files but very often now they are more expensive than the actual CD, which is a bit crazy.

      I really hope Spotify makes it, I find them much more competent than Amazon in providing an interesting music service. Amazon is providing mere distribution, really.

      We used to have a Qobuz subscription. I think Qobuz is the most interesting music service, but alas the app on Android is very unreliable and that killed it for us.

      Between Spotify, CDs and vinyls, there has never been a better supply of ways to get music.
       
    6. psikey

      psikey
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 5, 2005
      Messages:
      7,543
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      South Yorkshire
      Ratings:
      +915
      Good read but only iPhone users really want to use Apple music.

      Once Spotify add a Hi-def/MQA option I think Tidal could disappear, but seeing as only way to get bit-perfect playback via Android via quality external DAC (and with UAPP app) I hope it doesn't. External DAC users connected to phones is likely small in the grand scheme of things so who knows. At the £9.99 price if "money is king" then its Spotify every time.

      I always come back to Spotify for ease of use and speed of operation. Spotify Connect is especially good. I've tried many of the others but never stopped my Spotify Premium sub which I've had for years now.
       
      Last edited: Mar 7, 2018
    7. invisiblekid

      invisiblekid
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 10, 2009
      Messages:
      4,336
      Products Owned:
      4
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,232
      I have an iPhone and in no way want to use Apple Music! Tried the free trial and carried on a for a few months, but I found the integration of my own music (granted this is not an issue for everyone) and Apple's music to be terrible and the UI blurgh and just nasty.

      I've not long cancelled my Tidal subscription and kept Spotify. Not sure I should have done, but so far Spotify is enough. Even with a US account saving a few quid, it was too costly for me to keep both so Spotify's curated playlists and slightly better content won........for now.
       
    8. mushii

      mushii
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Apr 3, 2003
      Messages:
      1,285
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Stoke On Trent
      Ratings:
      +692
      My music listening is very eratic. We have Spotify for family listening which is OK for daily stuff and frequent parties (easy play lists). I also have about 2Tb of MP3 ripped music (that I own) on my Synology NAS and lately I have started buying Hi Def Audio 24/96 and 24/192 FLACs for the stuff that I really care about. I have also started listening to my old CDs again and have started to re-rip them to FLAC. I am really torn over streaming services I love the convenience but I also still like owning physical media.

      Streaming media is a dichotomy - its convenience is great BUT people seldom sit down and listen to an album any more, and because of that I think that I lot of great music is lost or overlooked. Once upon a time music had intrinsic value (you could hold it, you could trade it) and people valued it, because to listen to music required some degree of effort. Now music has almost zero intrinsic value, as you don't touch it, you cant trade it, and playing it is almost effortless. Combine this with low bit/sample rate rate highly compressed MP3s and crappy Beats headphones and there is a whole generation that has never heard Hi Fidelity music, which in my opinion devalues it further. Don't get me wrong, I am not some Luddite who wants to go back to the dark-ages of analogue only music played on gramophones, but at the same time, where movies gained from advances in technology, such as 1080p and 4k media and displays, I feel that the reverse has happened for music. We have gone from Hi-Fi systems (even midi systems) with separate components and full range speakers to mobile phones, crappy bass inducing headphones and tiny, tinny Blu-tooth speakers. Even with the rise of HQ Audio streaming services I guess much of this material will be consumed on some fairly low grade (audio) equipment. I think that for 95% of the population, hifi today equates to a £300 Apple Home Pod or a single £500 Sonos Play 5 (I will probably get some push back on these forums on these numbers, but that is because these forums are mainly made up of the remaining 5%, who do actually own HiFi). Sadly I dont think that the rise in HD streaming services will ever bring HiFi back to the masses, because although the media will be available (ish) the outlets that sell the equipment to play HiFi music have sadly disappeared from the high street and are now relegated to small specialist outlets very often in small towns, which are only visited by old-guys in cardigans (like me) who want or can afford to buy un-attractive boxes with odd sounding names. I know there are a couple of Retail Chains left that sell hifi equipment but they have their own problems (like not opening until 11am or not actually holding any stock in stores!).

      At the end of all of this, streaming media is here to stay. How long physical media will be around, who knows. The future of hifi, well that is to be seen. Music has never been more accessible than it is today but was the trade-off of quantity of quality really worth it ?
       
      • Like Like x 6
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • List
    9. Doc

      Doc
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2000
      Messages:
      77
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      22
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +32
      I'm an iPhone and Apple Music user.. and I love it. I have music playing for several hours a day, every day. I can listen to 99% of the music I search for specifically, and have discovered loads of new music I like too.
      Plus, I'm loving the new HomePod speaker.
      So I'm a very happy Apple Music listener..
       
    10. boyarin

      boyarin
      Member

      Joined:
      Sep 8, 2017
      Messages:
      50
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      11
      Location:
      USA
      Ratings:
      +21
      I am listening Apple Music cos have a full ecosystem of Apple products in my family. For very reasonable price i have all my music collection since 2001 in one place with Apple family plan
      All the process is simple and native, i like it as a big music listening fan and a musician.

      All in all i will never return to the era of bying CDs or Vinyl
       
    11. andyrs2000

      andyrs2000
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Sep 6, 2015
      Messages:
      553
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      Manchester
      Ratings:
      +131
      Just a quick question, i have an Amazon prime account, does this include Amazon music or is that extra ?
       
    12. IronSoldier

      IronSoldier
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 15, 2018
      Messages:
      110
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      England
      Ratings:
      +103
      Amazon music unlimited is separate to amazon prime and it's benefits. However amazon prime includes a partial library music streaming service called prime music.

      Prime Music

      Music Unlimited

      What's the difference? Prime Music has 2 Million songs. Music Unlimited has 40 Million.
       
    13. Synchro

      Synchro
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 14, 2004
      Messages:
      5,728
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Chester
      Ratings:
      +1,411
      It can't be downloaded to play offline though, which is a killer feature for most people, who take their music seriously.
       
    14. Doc

      Doc
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2000
      Messages:
      77
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      22
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +32
      It can though. Several websites automate the process, eg. keepvid.com
      (And it offers a choice of formats for the download, both video formats and audio formats, if you just want to get the music)
       
    15. StanleyKubrick

      StanleyKubrick
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Mar 3, 2018
      Messages:
      219
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      Kent
      Ratings:
      +149
      Clip Grab is another (it's the one I use)but there are hundreds...and never pay for one, as most of the best ones are FREE shareware.
       
    16. rosscouk

      rosscouk
      Member

      Joined:
      Apr 19, 2006
      Messages:
      348
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      31
      Ratings:
      +74
      I have tried all the music services, but I am currently with Tidal due to the quality of the streaming. I think if Spotify had offered lossless I would have stayed with them. I now subscribed to Roon also which links in with Tidal. Roon manages all my local content making connections and allowing multi-room management and up-scaling possibilities (it does tons of stuff). It also links to tidal so when you find a new link, which Roon is throwing up all the time, you can bring the album (for example) down from tidal and it looks like its in your collection, its brilliant. Its just a shame that it only links with Tidal and there is not a bit more choice for everyone. But to me, Tidal is great and better with Roon.
       
    17. Synchro

      Synchro
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 14, 2004
      Messages:
      5,728
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Chester
      Ratings:
      +1,411
      Plex to play "my" lossless music. Anything else to play other stuff (the cheaper/free the better).
       
    18. Toon Army

      Toon Army
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 1, 2004
      Messages:
      933
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Kinver, South Staffs
      Ratings:
      +563
      Thanks Ed. It's always interesting to read about the bigger picture. I once had a free 6 month trial for Apple Music. I stopped using it after 2 months for a variety of reasons and continue to use Spotify Premium. Great UI, library, sound quality, use on a variety of devices etc.
       
    19. Spacecat

      Spacecat

      Joined:
      Apr 1, 2001
      Messages:
      3,365
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +1,012
      luckily for me I'm pretty much 'ALL Musiced UP' and don't really have any space left in my brain to take in any 'new' 'must listen' ' Chilean synth, Danish electro or Afghanistani Jazz,' or indeed the time to listen to it, I'm amazed how adult people with jobs and kids do it.

      now and again a song that ive never heard of sneaks in or a one I had long forgotten and it gets played in a movie and I think oh that's nice ....but it doesn't happen very often.

      I think the difference between film and music is that film tends to be a one off, now and again twice entertainment whereas music you may listen to the same stuff 1000s of times over the years

      therefore a movie is something you would likely perceive as an 'Event' worth splashing out on whereas a Song is just one of many 1000s of things and would not hold as much value

      I sometimes listen to songs on youtube ...actually mainly to see the video , but all my music must be on my system ..I would never even think of streaming it , ive had free Spotify offers for months of free service and never even bothered installing it or trying it out

      just my 2cents
       
    20. mushii

      mushii
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Apr 3, 2003
      Messages:
      1,285
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Stoke On Trent
      Ratings:
      +692
      I guess that is my point, once upon a time, going to buy an LP was ‘an event’ and it did mean something. Now music has been devalued to a certain degree, even though we access and use it more.
      Again I guess quality means more to me personally than quantity. It’s why I’d sooner buy 5 or 6 Blu rays a month rather than pay for 200 channels of pap on Sky each month. Each to their own though.
       
    21. Ed Selley

      Ed Selley
      AVF Reviewer

      Joined:
      Jun 26, 2003
      Messages:
      11,195
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,667
      Odd to relate, streaming services have resulted in me buying much, much more music. I can now listen to new artists, in my own time and deep dive their portfolios. When I find things I like, I more often than not seek it out on vinyl (or sometimes lossless or high res). Artists like Wild Beasts, My Baby, Heliocentrics and Public Service Broadcasting to name but a few are all ones I have purchased heavily having first encountered them on streaming services. I freely admit this is not 'normal' (although artists do see upswings in tour ticket sales from streaming) but it's how it works for me.
       
    22. xxGBHxx

      xxGBHxx
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2015
      Messages:
      346
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      United Kingdom
      Ratings:
      +357
      I had a Tidal account for about 12 months but I found almost all of what I listened to wasn't in Master quality anyway. Everything I listen to is on my Amazon Unlimited sub which I started instead of Tidal and it's a lot cheaper too. Can't say I miss Tidal in the slightest.

      I'll also be the one to take the flak and put his neck out and say I couldn't tell the difference between the two. I guess I'm getting older and my ears are not as acute as they used to be so I'm sure that's part of it. That said "Best" quality in Amazon Unlimited is no different to whatever the best in Tidal was to me. No I don't listen on any quality equipment at the moment, no I'm not an audiophile and no I really don't notice. Maybe if I strained and did a proper A/B test I might notice the difference but really why bother? If it is different, it's small enough for me not to notice either way.

      G
       
    23. Hixs

      Hixs
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 24, 2015
      Messages:
      2,202
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      France
      Ratings:
      +1,021
      I was shocked that Spotify doesn't turn a profit. If/when they do add lossy to Spotify, I'll happily pay 20/month. Would still be great value for money.
       
    24. MartinH32

      MartinH32
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      May 6, 2005
      Messages:
      2,237
      Products Owned:
      4
      Products Wanted:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Castleford
      Ratings:
      +629
      My music listening is quite sporadic - I use Spotify (I have a family subscription) in the car, whilst I'm working and general housework. But I also have a reasonable quality AV system and if I find anything of interest on Spotify it normally results in a CD purchase. It's very rare I listen to much new music so music discovery on Spotify is great - it also means I can sometimes get a CD on music magpie for only a couple of quid from something I've discovered! If anything since subscribing to Spotify my CD collection has grown substantially.
      I also like having something physical - like a CD, streaming services can go and you don't own the music. Once I've got my CD it's mine, and although I do rip it to lossless it's for convenience.
       
    25. Khazul

      Khazul
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Sep 10, 2017
      Messages:
      1,395
      Products Owned:
      2
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      86
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +470
      Really? A tenner gets you a 4K Netflix sub - I think 20 quid a month is way over priced.
       
    26. Pecker

      Pecker
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Dec 26, 2004
      Messages:
      22,382
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Huddersfield, People's Republic of Yorkshire
      Ratings:
      +4,495
      Excellent article, great discussion.

      I'm on Amazon Unlimited and really like it. What I'd like:

      1 - The option of better quality. I don't see why this isn't there already. I can't imagine it's a space issue on Amazon's servers. And it'd be easy to structure prices to put off people who didn't really need it. Say mp3 for £10 a month, lossless for £12 or £13 ?

      2 - More flexibility to download. Currently it's simply not possible to play my Amazon streamed music on my FiiO X3. Look Amazon, if I wanted to 'steal' this stuff I could. Just let me download everything I can stream for free.

      3 - What about abroad? I do a lot of listening when I'm out and about (waking, public transport), but I spend a disproportionately large amount of time listening on the summer holidays. Why not introduce a 'fair usage' policy so I can stream in Spain or Greece?
       
    27. Ed Selley

      Ed Selley
      AVF Reviewer

      Joined:
      Jun 26, 2003
      Messages:
      11,195
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,667
      Unfortunately, it is a little more complicated than that. Assuming that FLAC on streaming services will be toward the upper end of compression rates, it still requires double the bandwidth to store and stream than 320kbps MP3. The issue is compounded by the vastness of the catalogue. Whereas Amazon can devote considerable resources into ensuring that The Grand Tour is good to go in the knowledge that it is the most popular thing on their video offering, no such bunching exists with audio which increases the strain on servers. It's perfectly possible they'd take the hit but be under no illusions, it would be a hit.

      Unencrypted downloads are never going to happen- sorry. Even if we accept that the effect on piracy would be debateable, record labels would never, ever go for it. There are players capable of handling the Amazon content though- the Pioneer XDP100R is available for buttons these days.

      Use abroad is more about telecoms providers than streaming services- I can already do what you want to do because I am a Three customer with 10 gigs a month that I can use under UK T&Cs in multiple countries.
       
    28. xxGBHxx

      xxGBHxx
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2015
      Messages:
      346
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      United Kingdom
      Ratings:
      +357
      When Netflix gives me access to the vast majority of films and tv released over the last 30 years in anywhere near that volume or quality I would agree. Fact is though the amount of material available at that quality is minute in comparison and you're still paying £10 for the privilege. (and no I'm not saying Netflix isn't worth it I'm just extending your comparison)

      The catalogue size difference between *ANY* tv and music based service is VAST. I am not surprised none of them make money as I would suggest that a sub to any of the major streaming services will give most people access to most of the music they ever listen to. The same is no where near true for any of the TV streaming services at any quality or price.

      Personally I find it quite staggering how cheap the music streaming services are at any price considering what you get. If I went back 30 or even 20 years and someone told me I could LEGALLY get access to the vast majority of English speaking popular music (not to mention world music, classical music and a lot or esoteric stuff) for £9.99 or extend that to the whole family for £15 I'd have laughed at them for being ridiculous. Yet here we are 20 years later with exactly that.

      While I appreciate you might not see value in a £20 sub, calling it "way overpriced" in comparison to Netflix is a little silly.

      G
       
    29. Khazul

      Khazul
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Sep 10, 2017
      Messages:
      1,395
      Products Owned:
      2
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      86
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +470
      The reason why I see it as a rip off as that it is double the premium cost. Premium is what 320Kbps? Raw uncompressed CD is 1.4Mbps (but streaming is probably lossless compressed, so less). A full HD TV service is 5-8Mbps, a 4K TV service is at least 15Mbps. So - so 3x bandwidth adds a few quid a month - which is fine - it doesn't double it.

      Hence why I think its a rip off. 13 would have been fine - 20 relative to 10 is a rip off.
       
    30. Hixs

      Hixs
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 24, 2015
      Messages:
      2,202
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      France
      Ratings:
      +1,021
      Which is very good value for money (though I can't even stream 4k). I do prefer blurays, and will always buy a movie if it's something I really want to watch, but for general viewing and series it's worth it's weight in gold.

      I don't see how 20/month is overpriced. For that money I'd have access to thousand of CD quality music for the price of 2 CDs a month (money I'd never notice missing). Staggeringly good value for money if you listen to a few hours of music a day. Some days I have spotify on from 6pm to 1am. I would get my monies worth.
       

    Share This Page

    Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice