Article & Poll: Should we keep the BBC Licence Fee?

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Andy Bassett, Mar 2, 2019.


  • ?
    1. The Licence Fee the most appropriate way for the BBC to be funded

      79 vote(s)
      18.9%
    2. The BBC has to change its funding approach to remain relevant

      105 vote(s)
      25.2%
    3. The BBC should become commercial and the licence fee scrapped

      223 vote(s)
      53.5%
    4. Other, please answer in the thread below...

      10 vote(s)
      2.4%
    1. Andy Bassett

      Andy Bassett
      Standard Member Staff Member

      Joined:
      Aug 7, 2017
      Messages:
      134
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      31
      Location:
      Sheffield, UK
      Ratings:
      +60
    2. Buckster666

      Buckster666
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Feb 2, 2006
      Messages:
      1,389
      Products Owned:
      8
      Products Wanted:
      8
      Trophy Points:
      86
      Location:
      West Bromwich
      Ratings:
      +494
      I haven't watched any BBC channel in several years, I only watch Netflix, Amazon Pime and Blu-ray's, I cancelled my TV licence and haven't looked back.
       
      • Agree Agree x 17
      • Like Like x 9
      • List
    3. Tempest

      Tempest
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 11, 2002
      Messages:
      8,112
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Horley, Surrey
      Ratings:
      +3,511
      Not sure what to say other than it seems VERY wrong that, you can be legally punished, and people went to prison for watching content NOT provided by the BBC, simply because if you wish to watch content from anyone live, even from another company who you have paid a subscription to, that you legally have to pay money to the BBC who you are not watching.

      Can't see that being right in any context, and if someone came along today and proposed such a concept they would be looked upon as utterly crazy.
       
      • Agree Agree x 32
      • Like Like x 5
      • List
    4. Over by there

      Over by there
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Mar 21, 2016
      Messages:
      1,759
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      113
      Location:
      Wales
      Ratings:
      +805
      Voted other. But now think I should be "Change Funding Approach"
      Personally I think we need a publicly funded broadcast mechanism. With IPTV happening then it needs another approach to collect funds etc. The landscape of content and delivery is changing rapidly at the moment
       
    5. Toon Army

      Toon Army
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 1, 2004
      Messages:
      1,040
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Kinver, South Staffs
      Ratings:
      +661
      The BBC still produce quality content ( at times ) and I listen to numerous BBC radio shows/podcasts. We hardly ever watch ITV and look at their funding model.
       
      • Agree Agree x 7
      • Like Like x 2
      • List
    6. Barbs77

      Barbs77
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Feb 21, 2015
      Messages:
      2,893
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      England
      Ratings:
      +3,685
      I think the BBC News coverage is good but the rest you should be able to opt in or out with different payment terms.
       
    7. BB3Lions

      BB3Lions
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Apr 24, 2009
      Messages:
      14,619
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      3
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +6,480
      Not paid for years, corrupt organisation that pushed paedophilia under the carpet for years.
       
      • Agree x 20
      • Like x 2
      • Thanks x 1
      • Wow x 1
      • Angry x 1
      • List
    8. lgans316

      lgans316
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2006
      Messages:
      12,193
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      RM16
      Ratings:
      +2,545
      Wife is now saying she doesn't watch iPlayer any more. Will discuss this weekend and cancel TV license as we don't watch BBC.

      Can I watch non-BBC channels excluding CBB on DTV without paying this atrocious TV License?

      Edit: Found this

      Live TV and how you watch it - TV Licensing ™
       
    9. lgans316

      lgans316
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Aug 24, 2006
      Messages:
      12,193
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      RM16
      Ratings:
      +2,545
      Not only corrupt..

      BBC = Biased Broadcasting Corporation
       
      • Agree Agree x 19
      • Like Like x 1
      • Angry Angry x 1
      • List
    10. MrFraggle

      MrFraggle
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 12, 2012
      Messages:
      3,149
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +4,936
      not sure what news service you watch but their so called News Channel is appalling.
      Very little actual news from around the world. In any one hour you will be lucky to get twenty minute of news, the rest of the hour being taken up with , This week in history, The Travel show, the weather, repeats of the headlines, being told what is coming up at least twice.

      And this will be repeated throughout the night and most of the day, why on earth are they plugging a live broadcast during the afternoon. finally the BBC has given up any semblance of non-bias on practically every subject, made ever so clear when the BBC decided to ask members of the public what they thought of the BBC's Brexit coverage and overwhelmingly the answer was that the BBC re[porting had been predominately negative.
       
      • Agree Agree x 5
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    11. Jules

      Jules
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 11, 2000
      Messages:
      5,650
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      137
      Ratings:
      +1,155
      The BBC has done great work with Sir David Attenborough's natural history programming like Planet Earth, but is otherwise utterly replaceable nowadays.

      Its time to scrap the license fee now I think.
       
      • Agree Agree x 15
      • Like Like x 2
      • List
    12. Barbs77

      Barbs77
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Feb 21, 2015
      Messages:
      2,893
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      England
      Ratings:
      +3,685
      Things will change when i retire properly but for now when i finish work i put the 6pm news on and then the local news and that is about it. Driving to and from work i am not in the car long enough to hear the news. Major events, usually bad i tend to see on here.
       
    13. Pecker

      Pecker
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Dec 26, 2004
      Messages:
      22,456
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Huddersfield, People's Republic of Yorkshire
      Ratings:
      +4,569
      First of all, thanks to Phil for a balanced and well-written article.

      A few thoughts:

      - As a general principle I would prefer it if we didn't have the licence fee sett up that we do, with people forced to pay for the BBC. However, the truth is it works. It's worked for years. And it produces some of the best TV in the world for a relatively small price.

      - Look at how much Sky, Amazon and Netflix cost per month. And how much do people actually watch compared to terrestrial.

      - As for commercial channels, please don't let anyone fool you into believing that you don't pay for it. Every time there's an advert on a TV channel, if you buy that product, you're paying for the TV content, whether you watch it or not. I very rarely watch ITV/C4/C5 (probably more C4 than the others, though SWMBO watches Corrie), yet I fund the lot.

      - Cbeebies is worth the licence fee alone.

      - People who say the BBC are biased appear equally spread across the political spectrum, suggesting they have it about right. I tend to find that those complaining will say the BBC is biased if it isn't a mouthpiece or their exact views.

      - The licence fee is £0.41 a day. Let's compare that with newspapers. I'm not sure any UK papers are under £0.41. Even if you believe the BBC is biased, you must also accept that all are biased, on the BBC certainly no worse than any other. Now compare the BBC news programmes, radio programmes, 24 hour news channel and website. vs The Sun. Or the Daily Mail. It's not just a question of it being no contest, it would take someone out of touch with reality (or with a massive agenda) to even need to think about it. And that's JUST the news. Even if we didn't get all the TV channels and radio stations, it'd still be great VFM.
       
      • Agree Agree x 9
      • Thanks Thanks x 2
      • List
    14. Marv

      Marv
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jun 7, 2002
      Messages:
      3,275
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Kekistan
      Ratings:
      +1,514
      The only thing i watch on tv is F1 and 99% of all my other viewing is eithe Netflix or blu rays. I like the option to not have to pay and not watch tv.
      The whole notion of needing a "License" to legally watch tv seems very silly anyhow.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    15. MrFraggle

      MrFraggle
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 12, 2012
      Messages:
      3,149
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +4,936
      The 6pm news is also brief with the the presenters telling us the headlines twice within the bulletin, and again the BBC feels the need not only to tell us what is coming up but also what is coming up in our local news. Content is extremely thin on the ground.
       
    16. John

      John
      Moderator

      Joined:
      Dec 13, 2002
      Messages:
      11,605
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,258
      Hate to break it to you, but there isn't actually a lot of 'news' that needs reporting. 24hr news channels do more harm than good imo
       
      • Agree Agree x 4
      • Like Like x 1
      • Love Love x 1
      • List
    17. aVdub

      aVdub
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 27, 2010
      Messages:
      8,576
      Products Owned:
      9
      Products Wanted:
      5
      Trophy Points:
      167
      Location:
      44° 3'53.21"N 73°30'54.36"E
      Ratings:
      +10,246
      I've been trying to convince the OH that due to that fact that we hardly ever watch the bbc and have been that way for many years that we should cancel the licence fee and enjoy more of Netflix, Amazon and what-ever other streaming services are available for us to choose.

      The news is there sometimes as a background noise in the morning but there's been more than a few times we've both agree'd to turn it over to anything else due to their bias or poorly presented news.

      I would be in favour of advertising being brought in to fund the bbc.
       
    18. MrFraggle

      MrFraggle
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 12, 2012
      Messages:
      3,149
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +4,936
      I beg to differ.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Funny Funny x 1
      • List
    19. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      10,425
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +9,020
      I only came up with the idea and guidance, it was written by Andy Bassett. Thanks.
       
    20. Over by there

      Over by there
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Mar 21, 2016
      Messages:
      1,759
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      113
      Location:
      Wales
      Ratings:
      +805
      24 hour news channels were going to happen once one did it. Sky I think? I usually find they have a good mix but it is run by humans meaning mistakes are made and editorial judgments will bound to upset some whether it is right or wrong.

      If people think BBC is biased (and I think it leans to the left and remain) then watch CH4 news. Snow and co. have a collective wet pants moment every time the tories fluff it up. Perhaps Foxneeds to come to the UK to counter CH4 if they wanted to balance out the UK news? Always RT and Press TV for the rest?

      I take the view that if the left and the right are both harping on about the Beeb being biased then they are not far wrong.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    21. Cord Cutter

      Cord Cutter
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Oct 20, 2005
      Messages:
      21,532
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Ashford, Kent
      Ratings:
      +2,624
      I cancelled my TV license over 3 years ago now and never heard a word from them. They send me a letter every 2 years to check whether I still don't need a license, to which I don't.

      It's a seriously out of date way for the BBC to operate. Millennials are probabaly opting out of their content to save the £145 or so a year as they're more likely to watch Netflix and Youtube
       
      • Agree Agree x 9
      • Angry Angry x 1
      • List
    22. NicolasB

      NicolasB
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 3, 2002
      Messages:
      6,667
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      137
      Location:
      Emily's Shop
      Ratings:
      +1,046
      Many people's perception of the licence fee is wrong. The BBC is a public service, not a commercial organisation, and the licence fee is not a payment for a product, it's a form of taxation. Suggesting that you shouldn't pay the licence fee because you don't watch the BBC enough is like saying you shouldn't have to pay tax to support the NHS if you usually aren't ill, or that you shouldn't pay tax to support the Fire Brigade because your house never catches fire. It may well be the case that you don't watch the BBC and don't get ill very often, but other people do both of those things, and it is still quite right that your tax money should support all of those public services for them, regardless of whether you have any need for them at the moment or not. That's just how tax and public services work.

      The BBC's funding model probably does need to change, for the simple reason that TV viewing methods are changing - increasingly, more and more content is distributed on demand via the Internet rather than broadcast - but instead of abolishing the licence fee, it should be replaced by a form of direct taxation.

      As for BritBox, think of that simply as a substitute for DVDs - instead of paying £6 to acquire a classic "Doctor Who" serial on disk, pay £5 a month to watch as many episodes as you like whenever you want. If enough of the BBC and ITV archive is made available in sufficiently good quality, that's not a bad deal - and no one's forcing you to pay for it, just as no one forces you to buy DVDs.
       
      • Like Like x 5
      • Agree Agree x 4
      • Funny Funny x 1
      • List
    23. gadget man

      gadget man
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 17, 2010
      Messages:
      255
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      43
      Ratings:
      +126
      Going on 6 years without license, do i miss TV nope. Happy with my blu-rays.
       
      • Agree Agree x 4
      • Like Like x 3
      • List
    24. Cord Cutter

      Cord Cutter
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Oct 20, 2005
      Messages:
      21,532
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Ashford, Kent
      Ratings:
      +2,624
      Watching TV isn't anywhere as essential as the HNS hence why people don't begrudge paying for that.

      And what I find funny is that over 75s get it for free when they are the biggest watchers and moaners about the rubbish on TV these days
       
    25. MrFraggle

      MrFraggle
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 12, 2012
      Messages:
      3,149
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Edinburgh
      Ratings:
      +4,936
      Can you show the evidence that this age group are the biggest moaners please.

      As for being amused that the over 75's get it for free and are the biggest watchers, you really need to keep up as the BBC are stopping the free licence or at least want to and I would suggest that for the over 75's the TV is there only link to the outside world.
       
    26. BT Bob

      BT Bob
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 22, 2006
      Messages:
      2,392
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Cardiff
      Ratings:
      +1,156
      I'd pay double if they'd scrap Eastenders.
       
      • Funny Funny x 10
      • Agree Agree x 9
      • List
    27. Base13

      Base13
      Active Member

      Joined:
      May 12, 2008
      Messages:
      87
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      8
      Location:
      Lincoln
      Ratings:
      +20
      A licence fee for the BBC has only one valid reason for existing: It creates content of value to the nation that wouldn’t otherwise exist.

      The BBC news is more trustworthy than any other sources, so I see value there.

      But on the flipside, my belief in the licence fee was reduced long ago when Eastenders was launched. This was set up to compete directly with similar existing offerings from commercial operations, therefore making it harder for others to operate here. That is the total opposite of what the BBC should be.
       
    28. Sloppy Bob

      Sloppy Bob
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jul 6, 2009
      Messages:
      3,837
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +2,978
      I think the licence is great value for money, for all the entertainment it provides, News, Radio etc.

      I do think though that the money should be collected another way and not via advertising.

      I moved house fairly recently and decided to cut the cord. I don't have my TV's tuned to any stations or connected to any aerials and I removed BBC iPlayer from them. Blurays, Netflix and Amazon Prime for me, for now, although I do miss the news.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    29. NicolasB

      NicolasB
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 3, 2002
      Messages:
      6,667
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      137
      Location:
      Emily's Shop
      Ratings:
      +1,046
      And I really must quibble with this notion of having to "pay twice" for BritBox, as if that were somehow a rip-off. I don't think people have any idea of how complicated and expensive it is to release an archived programme for additional viewing.

      Some might find it instructive to have a look at the Doctor Who Restoration Team website and see some of the processes involved in restoring an old show. For example:

      - "Doctor Who" was often shot using a mixture of video and 16mm film. In some cases the original film stock survives as well as the video tape of the entire episode; here, the film is scanned and digitised, which gives a significant boost to picture quality for the filmed scenes. (And the serial "Spearhead from Space" was actually remastered into HD and released on blu ray).

      - Old TV shows were sometimes archived by being transferred to film - often simply by pointing a film camera at a monitor during broadcast. This results in what was originally a 50Hz interlaced video image being compressed down to a 25FPS progressive one. The team created a technique (”VidFIRE") which reverses that process.

      - Some "Doctor Who" episodes were converted from PAL to NTSC (badly) and the original PAL versions lost. The team developed a technique for back-converting to PAL which significantly improves the picture.

      - In cases where a colour episode was preserved only on black and white film, what was originally an unwanted side effect of the chroma information in the signal appearing as high frequency dark and white dots can be used to partially reconstruct the original colour from the black and white image. In one story, three episodes are re-colourised using this technique, and the fourth is colourised almost by hand (one frame in four is done manually, the other by a computer extrapolating).

      - For some stories where there is both a black and white film and a colour NTSC conversion available (but no original PAL) they were able to combine luminance information from the film with chroma information from the back-converted video. (Not an easy task, given that film can shrink or stretch unevenly over time, while a video image doesn't).

      - There's a lot of general clean-up of scratches, drop-outs, etc.

      - For some stories there are optional CGI effects that can replace or enhance some of the original effects shots.

      - In cases where an episode is entirely missing except for an audio track, the BBC commissioned brand new animated versions to replace them.

      And that's just the technical side. On top of that, there are all of the financial and legal costs:

      Actors who appear in a show need to be paid additional royalties if the episode is released on DVD or a streaming service.

      Any music needs to have additional fees paid to the copyright holder. (On the DVD release of "Hamish Macbeth" there's an episode missing. The reason is that the plot revolves around an amateur production of "West Side Story" and the cast sing a couple of songs from the show. The cost of licensing those songs on a DVD was so vast that the BBC had no choice but to simply omit it from the DVD entirely.)

      And there are a whole host of other creative and legal expenses involved.

      And yet people genuinely believe that this entire process should be provided free of charge to anyone who wants to view the show! It boggles the mind.
       
      • Like Like x 2
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • List
    30. Har-One

      Har-One
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jan 16, 2009
      Messages:
      4,877
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      167
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +2,916
      The BBC has two sides like pretty much everything. It produces wonderful programs but not all of their programs are wonderful.

      First of all they should cut down the salaries of its employees, including the presenters that earn a fortune and are nothing but parasites. The debate about competition has been used over and over to justify those salaries. They do not have to compete about funding, that is the sole reason of the license.

      Another myth is impartiality, there is not a single TV Channel,newspaper or similar that is impartial. All of them have some bias and an editor who decides what will make it into the light or ends contract to journalists who do not want to compromise. For example, the Jeremy Thorpe scandal was shown decades later. The BBC might be one of the less partial but not totally impartial.

      The BBC still has a place in British society but needs to modernise and probably changing its funding strategy, including going commercial. Of course that its "impartiality" would be more compromised. The right balance between impartiality and funding might be a tough nut to crack.
       
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • Like Like x 1
      • List

    Share This Page

    Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice