andrew markwort
Established Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2004
- Messages
- 1,156
- Reaction score
- 157
- Points
- 185
- Age
- 64
I realise that on this particular part of the forum this will sound like heresy, but I'm really not all that bothered about 3D TV. Don't get me wrong - if you like it, that's great, but it personally doesn't grab me.
However, my question is this. Given all the extra grunt that is required to produce a good 3D image, does this mean that 3D sets will be the best at producing 2D pictures? Or is it the case that the best 2D sets take a different technological route and produce better pictures?
I'm toying with getting a new set in another few months and wonder whether it's worth getting a 3D set if it will give me a better 2D picture and just have the 3D as icing on the cake.
However, my question is this. Given all the extra grunt that is required to produce a good 3D image, does this mean that 3D sets will be the best at producing 2D pictures? Or is it the case that the best 2D sets take a different technological route and produce better pictures?
I'm toying with getting a new set in another few months and wonder whether it's worth getting a 3D set if it will give me a better 2D picture and just have the 3D as icing on the cake.