Dismiss Notice
Attention AVForums app / Tapatalk users
Sadly GDPR means that, from 25th, we can no longer offer access to AVForums via the branded app or Tapatalk.
Click here for more information.

Apple fans view on the nano

Discussion in 'Headphones, Earphones & Portable Music' started by gerbilly, Sep 8, 2005.

  1. gerbilly

    gerbilly
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,193
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Hamilton
    Ratings:
    +94
    This will surprise some and especially Johann but I am not a fan.

    Now the mini at 4 and 6gb was a seperate DAP from the larger I-Pod in both style and battery life.

    Sound quality I am certain will be no different with the nano, however to me this just looks like a poor man equivalent of the larger i-pod photo. With only 2gb and 4gb it has less capacity but it seem as though it will be a more expensive player just because of its colour screen.

    The battery life on this is worse than my mini (which can get 20 hours) so I am very dissapointed in this device. They should have had an 8gb or a 10gb device and start getting the battery life sorted, the mini is fine but any criticism of the other players for battery life is justified. :thumbsdow
     
  2. CrispyXUK

    CrispyXUK
    Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,742
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Land of the Living, Essex
    Ratings:
    +37
    Poo IMO, I've already got a Mobile Phone, Gameboy Advance & Nintendo DS that can hold more songs and play video too, no thanks apple
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice