1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

--alt-preset insane 320k or atrac3+ 256k?

Discussion in 'Headphones, Earphones & Portable Music' started by Darthvador, Apr 1, 2005.

  1. Darthvador

    Darthvador
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    58
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    paignton
    Ratings:
    +0
    :eek: Which is best --alt-preset insane (320 kbit/s CBR, highest possible quality) mp3 lame or atrac3plus 256k for sound quality space is not inportant

    if lame is better which version of Lame 3.90 or Lame 3.97 or Lame 4.00

    atrac3+ is brighter with a more puchy bass but whith a roughnes sort of a sony prescribed tinitus whereas lame is lower and smoothed and polished some might say to soft which is better

    for sony nw hd3

    any body please :lease:
     
  2. mcav

    mcav
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    456
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Ratings:
    +58
    it's all down to your own ears

    I certainly prefer the lame mp3 codec to anything else...

    But to be honest - there are a lot of good codes around these days.
     
  3. Darthvador

    Darthvador
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    58
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    paignton
    Ratings:
    +0
    which version of lame are using and at what seeting
     

Share This Page

Loading...