1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Alpha 9 CD or Diva CD73?

Discussion in 'Arcam Owners' Forum' started by riverrun, Jul 4, 2004.

  1. riverrun

    riverrun
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    Which replacement for an alpha 7 CD would be better? (To accompany alpha 8 and 8p bi-amped)
     
  2. Crustyloafer

    Crustyloafer
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Messages:
    9,501
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Ratings:
    +1,237
    I would definitely look at the CD73 or you might get a good deal on a second hand CD82 now that they are discontinued.
     
  3. Plump

    Plump
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    636
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Location:
    under the bridge
    Ratings:
    +0
    I would rather take one alpha9 than five CD73
     
  4. riverrun

    riverrun
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    Plump, I've read your championship of the alpha 9 in other posts, but as crustyloafer suggests, isn't the CD82 not equal to it in specification, and being available new, with the advantage of a greater life expectancy than a used CD9 for approx the same money? (Also easier to find)
     
  5. Spligsey

    Spligsey
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,069
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    UK
    Ratings:
    +137
    I suspect that Plump prefers the DCS Ring DAC that the Alpha 9 has.


    Adz
     
  6. riverrun

    riverrun
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    I would suppose the FMJ CD23 to be more Plump-friendly then? (And as hard to find as the Alpha 9)
     
  7. Spligsey

    Spligsey
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,069
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    UK
    Ratings:
    +137
    I would imagine that the CD23 would be to his liking - great player.

    I also think the CD33 is a class act too (non DCS ring DAC).

    Seen a few CD23's on Ebay, everynow & then one pops up on hififorsale.com


    Adz
     
  8. riverrun

    riverrun
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    An alpha 7 can no longer be upgraded to an alpha 9, because of lack of parts, but for £200 it can be modified to CD82 specifications, according to Arcam (our main dealer in Ireland quotes 399 euro). An ex-dem CD82 would cost about £400, so that's not bad. However, for £300 you could probably get an alpha 9, and for a little bit more a CD23, which is what I finally did, based in part on some of the comments here. Now what do you do with a CD23?
     
  9. warrj

    warrj
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    The Alpha 9 IMO, or as has already been suggested, a CD23. The RingDAC may be a bit long in the tooth but I'm not personally convinced that it's been bettered by anything in the Arcam price range - just my opinion you understand.

    Regards,

    Jules.
     

Share This Page

Loading...