Daveell
Novice Member
Big topic, I know. I find myself just wondering what's right in these situations, science wise and moral. Canadian here, but follow a lot of usa politics. So first off, I will say my thoughts on this topic have changed a bit throughout the years, but would still consider myself pro choice. My thoughts used to be(before i learned more about it) that the life wasn't considered a life until it comes out of the women and takes it's first breath. After looking into it, and learning however, I don't think this makes any sense scientifically. I mean, how could the science change say from the day b4 it comes out to the day, makes 0 sense. I think we would all agree its wrong to deliver a baby and snap its neck when it comes out, so i see it as wrong in doing that days prior as well.
Now comes the part when you have to go back and say when is it ok, and when not. Brain activity, heart beat, feeling pain, etc.. what makes a living human being? I know science does say its a life at conception which makes sense to me. However, I don't think you can say at conception its the same type of life as you and me.. Another thing is, I do believe its the women(and man) responsibility of creating that life.. There are many things you can do to not become pregnant, not having sex, protection, and even morning after pills etc.. So here's a question, what would be wrong with say having a ban on abortion say in the later terms? I mean, most usa and canada actually are in the camp of this. Most are against late term abortions. This would give women plenty of time to have one if needed, but keep it to the lower months when hopefully the fetus/baby doesn't feel pain etc.. Why do so many ppl get mad over this thought, when most north america anyway, agrees that late term abortions arent acceptable for no reason what so ever? thoughts?
Now comes the part when you have to go back and say when is it ok, and when not. Brain activity, heart beat, feeling pain, etc.. what makes a living human being? I know science does say its a life at conception which makes sense to me. However, I don't think you can say at conception its the same type of life as you and me.. Another thing is, I do believe its the women(and man) responsibility of creating that life.. There are many things you can do to not become pregnant, not having sex, protection, and even morning after pills etc.. So here's a question, what would be wrong with say having a ban on abortion say in the later terms? I mean, most usa and canada actually are in the camp of this. Most are against late term abortions. This would give women plenty of time to have one if needed, but keep it to the lower months when hopefully the fetus/baby doesn't feel pain etc.. Why do so many ppl get mad over this thought, when most north america anyway, agrees that late term abortions arent acceptable for no reason what so ever? thoughts?