a3+ 256 High or a3+ 352

Discussion in 'Headphones, Earphones & Portable Music' started by Osagie, Nov 2, 2005.

  1. Osagie

    Osagie
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Since we can encode a3+ 256 with two options, Normal (Faster) or High quality sound, and only one option to encode a3+ 352 (and not really sure if this one is normal or high) .....

    Which option sounds better?????

    Any suggestion??????
     
  2. Beethovenian

    Beethovenian
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    The options Normal or High refer to ripping quality. High quality will just take more time to analyse the CD in order to avoid glitches etc. Probably not as good as EAC, but it's an option for those who have occasionally poor rips (Shadowritten has complained about this, so this may be the solution). Since you can't encode from CD to a3+ 352, there's no ripping option.
     
  3. Osagie

    Osagie
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    You can rip direct to a3+ 256 or you can rip to AAL/wav and then force it to tranfer in a3+ 352 (with SonicStage 3.3)

    Any other opinion?
     
  4. Osagie

    Osagie
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    none don do test?
     

Share This Page

Loading...