I’ve been using LG 55LX9500 for the last 11 years. To be honest, I really like this old TV because it has great viewing angles which is to be expected from an IPS panel, 240 local dimming zones (pretty advanced feature for 2010). Naturally, an IPS panel has its fair share of downsides, for example, elevated blacks, blooming (which is partially mitigated by a quite aggressive FALD algorithm resulting in significant loss of shadow detail). This TV supports only 1080p60 via its HDMI 1.4, no HDR, no VRR, the input lag is considerable and the panel has some screen uniformity issues, also, there’s a strange glitch with chroma resolution. Although I feed in 1080p60Hz 4:4:4 signal, test patters produce a strange softness.
LG 55LX9500 in 4:2:2

LG 55LX9500 in 4:4:4

I think the time has come to move on, so I’m in the market for a new TV. As I’ve already mentioned above, for me a TV primarily (about 80% of total usage) serves as a PC monitor for productivity work like MatLAB, MS Visual Studio, spreadsheets etc. Occasionally, I also play Xbox and very rarely (about twice a month) watch movies.
I’ll try to define my requirements for the new TV. For me, the most important factor is precise PC mode, no subpixel rendering or dithering (I’m talking to you, Samsung and Sony), ability to resolve full and honest 4:4:4 chroma at 4K120Hz. I’m not really sure about 8K TV because to achieve 8K60, DSC is mandatory – even HDMI 2.1 port with full 48 Gbps bandwidth is incapable of sending uncompressed 8K60 4:4:4 signal without the DSC due to insufficient bandwidth. I’m using dual RTX 3090’s with the NVLink. Besides Windows UI elements in 8K would look way too tiny for a comfortable usage.
The next factor is resistance to screen burn-in. I routinely leave static images on the screen for several hours, so an OLED panel could suffer from premature degradation. Although I’ve seen OLED monitors, so, perhaps, this is not such a big problem for OLED panels - I don’t know.
Wide viewing angles is another critical feature, so a VA panel without the wide viewing angle filter is not an option.
One particular model has come into my attention: the LG QNED90/QNED99. Perhaps a proud QNED90/QNED99 owner would be willing to answer some questions about his TV. Can QNED90 (and QNED99) display 4K120 4:4:4 (and 8K60 4:4:4) without any artefacts? Vincent Teoh reported on QNED99: “When it came to chroma preproduction, it is somewhere between 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 maybe because of the 8K sub-pixel structure”. Can somebody confirm this? Does this problem also apply to QNED90 at 4K120? Does QNED90/QNED99 support motion interpolation in PC mode? Does QNED90 chipset supports two HDMI 2.1 ports at full 48 Gbps? I’ve read that all four HDMI ports of QNED99 support HDMI 2.1 48 Gbps.
Another option would be Samsung QN900. Unfortunately, I had an enormous disappointment with Samsung 8K QLED TV a while ago because Q950RBTXXH in PC mode looked terrible. I would even go so far as to call it a scam and fake 8K. Are Samsung 2021 4K/8K models still plagued with this subpixel rendering?
A cheap VA panel

Samsung 8K TV

I’m also considering Sony Z9J and X95J.
I think an optimal size would be 80-90 inches diagonally, and price shouldn’t exceed, let’s say, 10’000 euros (I’m located in Europe).
I would appreciate other suggestions. Of course, there’s always an option to buy an industrial display but mu my opinion it would be an overkill in terms of price.
LG 55LX9500 in 4:2:2

LG 55LX9500 in 4:4:4

I think the time has come to move on, so I’m in the market for a new TV. As I’ve already mentioned above, for me a TV primarily (about 80% of total usage) serves as a PC monitor for productivity work like MatLAB, MS Visual Studio, spreadsheets etc. Occasionally, I also play Xbox and very rarely (about twice a month) watch movies.
I’ll try to define my requirements for the new TV. For me, the most important factor is precise PC mode, no subpixel rendering or dithering (I’m talking to you, Samsung and Sony), ability to resolve full and honest 4:4:4 chroma at 4K120Hz. I’m not really sure about 8K TV because to achieve 8K60, DSC is mandatory – even HDMI 2.1 port with full 48 Gbps bandwidth is incapable of sending uncompressed 8K60 4:4:4 signal without the DSC due to insufficient bandwidth. I’m using dual RTX 3090’s with the NVLink. Besides Windows UI elements in 8K would look way too tiny for a comfortable usage.
The next factor is resistance to screen burn-in. I routinely leave static images on the screen for several hours, so an OLED panel could suffer from premature degradation. Although I’ve seen OLED monitors, so, perhaps, this is not such a big problem for OLED panels - I don’t know.
Wide viewing angles is another critical feature, so a VA panel without the wide viewing angle filter is not an option.
One particular model has come into my attention: the LG QNED90/QNED99. Perhaps a proud QNED90/QNED99 owner would be willing to answer some questions about his TV. Can QNED90 (and QNED99) display 4K120 4:4:4 (and 8K60 4:4:4) without any artefacts? Vincent Teoh reported on QNED99: “When it came to chroma preproduction, it is somewhere between 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 maybe because of the 8K sub-pixel structure”. Can somebody confirm this? Does this problem also apply to QNED90 at 4K120? Does QNED90/QNED99 support motion interpolation in PC mode? Does QNED90 chipset supports two HDMI 2.1 ports at full 48 Gbps? I’ve read that all four HDMI ports of QNED99 support HDMI 2.1 48 Gbps.
Another option would be Samsung QN900. Unfortunately, I had an enormous disappointment with Samsung 8K QLED TV a while ago because Q950RBTXXH in PC mode looked terrible. I would even go so far as to call it a scam and fake 8K. Are Samsung 2021 4K/8K models still plagued with this subpixel rendering?
A cheap VA panel

Samsung 8K TV

I’m also considering Sony Z9J and X95J.
I think an optimal size would be 80-90 inches diagonally, and price shouldn’t exceed, let’s say, 10’000 euros (I’m located in Europe).
I would appreciate other suggestions. Of course, there’s always an option to buy an industrial display but mu my opinion it would be an overkill in terms of price.
Last edited: