P
petofi
Guest
Need help here.
Basically, I know that Sharp (some say Philips) leads the field in lcd tvs.
I've checked out the picture quality and it's lovely. Two things have made me decide in favour of the Sharps over the Philips: one, I don't like the 'look' of the Philips, and 2) I like the three year warranty of the Sharps.
However (deep breath...) when I originally started on this quest for
a 'showcase', theater-like tv, I decided that for these muchos bucks,
the tv had to be more than furniture. In fact, it had to dazzle on the wall
as an ornate decoration.
So, finally, my problem: I find that, aesthetically, the Sony 42mrx1 is head and shoulders above all the other tvs. However, how good is the tv technically? Am I way over-paying for the looks AND short-changing myself
on the techs?
I'm eager to hear your weighted arguments on this comparison of Sharp and Sony...
Basically, I know that Sharp (some say Philips) leads the field in lcd tvs.
I've checked out the picture quality and it's lovely. Two things have made me decide in favour of the Sharps over the Philips: one, I don't like the 'look' of the Philips, and 2) I like the three year warranty of the Sharps.
However (deep breath...) when I originally started on this quest for
a 'showcase', theater-like tv, I decided that for these muchos bucks,
the tv had to be more than furniture. In fact, it had to dazzle on the wall
as an ornate decoration.
So, finally, my problem: I find that, aesthetically, the Sony 42mrx1 is head and shoulders above all the other tvs. However, how good is the tv technically? Am I way over-paying for the looks AND short-changing myself
on the techs?
I'm eager to hear your weighted arguments on this comparison of Sharp and Sony...