30d is on its way... lenses?

Discussion in 'Photography Forums' started by chris1210, Sep 10, 2007.

  1. chris1210

    chris1210
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    719
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +28
    Thanks to Currys' weekend offer, i bought myself a 30D which is in the post :thumbsup:

    First on my list is the Canon 10-22. What i do need is a good walkabout lens.

    As ill only be buying one other lens to compliment this for now, i'd like it to have something over 100mm+ if possible.. IF.

    The Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is very tempting if its anything like the 17-50 i had on my D80 ... but its a tad short. The other options being the Canon 28-135 IS, which has very good reviews, and the Tamron 24-135, but lacks the IS of the Canon lens.

    Anyone have either of these on a 30D? What would you recommend?

    Cheers!
     
  2. T0MAT01

    T0MAT01
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,383
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Devon, Sussex or somewhere inbetween.
    Ratings:
    +552
    The Canon 28-135 is not that wide on a crop sensor (as I expect you already know) but coupled with a 10-22 I'd say you would have a very nice focal range covered.

    I think it would be my choice over either of the Tamrons due to the extra length and IS.
     
  3. allymac123

    allymac123
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    2,065
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    York
    Ratings:
    +435
    Do you need it to be particurarly fast (constant F2.8 bacically)?

    If not the Canon 24-105 F4L IS might be a good choice. It's range would be pretty sweet when coupled with the Canon 10-22.
     
  4. timus

    timus
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,002
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Sompting, West Sussex
    Ratings:
    +216
    Pretty expensive that one though whats your budget?
     
  5. Thatsnotmynaim

    Thatsnotmynaim
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,201
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Middle Earth
    Ratings:
    +820
    Need to know budget really else we're all just guessing. 28-135 is cracking for the money but is really aimed at the FF but budget market, is there one now a days?!? I think it's a bit underrated although good or maybe it's just no longer needed since the EF-S 17-85 IS is better and the equivalent crop camera lens. 24-105 is just great, L quality with a good range. If you can stretch to the 24-105 it would be a lens of choice, half way between the two mentioned above so good with both crop and FF and one to keep for many years for a general outside walkabout or even a lower light lens if you don't mind turning up the ISO.
     
  6. jonnypb

    jonnypb
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,130
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Ratings:
    +559
    Just sold mine on POTN, If I'd have read this earlier you could have got a brand new lens for a very good price :rolleyes: If you do want a 10-22 one stop digital are the cheapest or if you want to buy in the UK contact Ian Kerr (Kerso on ebay)

    It all depends on your budget but the Canon 24-105L seems to be a very good lens. From what I've read the CANON EF 28-105mm 28-105 II USM is better than the Canon 28-135 IS that you mentioned, quite cheap as well.
     
  7. dood

    dood
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2000
    Messages:
    947
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Hobart
    Ratings:
    +38
    Agree that 28-135 is not wide enough unless you have another lens to cover the wide end. However, the reach to 135 is very useful and if I have to travel light, it's the only lens I take. IS is useful. On paper, the older version of IS on this lens does not give you as many extra stops as the IS on newer lenses (eg the 17-85). However, this may not translate in practice. A recent review of the 70-200 f/4 IS, which is supposed to offer 4 extra stops, compared to older IS lenses which only give 2 or 3 extra stops, showed that in practice 4 extra stops was not achievable.

    From my experience I have found the IS on the 28-135 to be worth having. I recently used it and was quite impressed with the image quality, especially when stopped down a bit. I surprised myself, especially since I have been spoilt by the superb sharpness of the 24-70L. Of course the build quality does not compare with the 24-70, but it is significantly better than the cheap feeling kit lens and 50 1.8.
     
  8. chris1210

    chris1210
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    719
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +28
    Thanks for the replies :)

    I guess budget is the biggest 'issue' really. I'd be looking to spend £250, maybe £300 on top of the 10-22mm to find a mid-range zoom.

    The 24-105L is something i looked long and hard at yesterday, but its an awful lot to spend right now on top of the new body etc. Cant say i wouldnt look at it in a few months tho!

    So, i've done a lot of reading on the net, many forums, review sites etc, and have decided that for now, at least, the 28-135IS will suit me most as a walkabout lens. And cos i can pick one up for a little over £200 on eBay, i could probably get a 50mm 1.8 too.

    Oooo its all exciting :D lol
     
  9. wilber

    wilber
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,970
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Ratings:
    +30
    I'd not buy the 10-22 & buy the Sigma 10-20 - I love mine that will save you some pennies to spend on other things. My workhorse is the 17-85 IS which is great I must admit to being a bit of a sceptic of any lens with a huge zoon range so I go 10-20 17-85 & 70-200 (F:/4 L) (I really should use this lens more but I tend towards the wideangle)
     

Share This Page

Loading...