|
AV forums seems to become very pushy towards Blu-Ray part of me understands why, but many of us are happy with DVD and don't see Blu as a worth while investment. Is the DVD picture from the player better/worse or pretty much the same to the £99 BluRay players that the review suggests buying otherwise, or is BluRay format being pushed as a better all round solution?
Having a policy of only reviewing Blu although its been around for a while now does mean that some releases like indy titles and tv series miss out (with the exeception of big budget ones like Battlestar). I honestly don't find myself reading my 'software' reviews here, partially because of that, for big releases though only reviewing Blu is probably fine as its understandable that peoples time is limited (a comparison would be an added incentive to read the review though).
I personally find a good DVD transfer when upscaled, with my player anyway, is close enough to BluRay for me, and poor transfers exist on both mediums.
Maybe I'm just a scrudge, and what's the point of high end equipment if you can't use it to its maximum? But I get immense enjoyment out of 'legacy' equipment and always blow friends/family away with the image and sound quality available from DVD.
Last edited by gazbarber; 26-02-2010 at 10:24 PM.
|