AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

JVC 32L5GY Vs Panny 32PH40

Post Reply
Old 10-03-2003, 11:55 PM   #1
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
4,005, Level: 14
Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 211
JVC 32L5GY Vs Panny 32PH40

I hava a Sony 32FX66 which I am thinking of sending back due to buzzing (its my second one)

Anyway I am looking at either the JVC 32L5 or the Panny 32PH40.

Can anyone recommend or put me off either.

I mostly watch Sky, DVDs Football.

Another option is the JVC 32X25

Also if anyone knows anyone doing good deals on the above.

I will use JL and get a price match.

Thanks in Advance

Ste
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 1:57 AM   #2
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Staffordshire
Experience Points:
3,312, Level: 13
Points: 3,312, Level: 13 Points: 3,312, Level: 13 Points: 3,312, Level: 13
Activity: 0.3%
Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 18
Hi,

You can see my opinion on the PH40 in this thread:

Click Me
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 2:15 AM   #3
jac
Guest
Posts: n/a
ste1010

i have the 32x25 now and am currently deciding what to exchange it for.

it has a good stable picture but its processing is just to annoying for fast action.

It has the digipure circuit which takes away motion blur but introduces digital artifacts

I have not seen the 32l5 in the flesh you talk of but i would assume this model has similar problems ie same processing circuit

However i notice jvc say this model has SUPER digipure

jac
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 3:18 AM   #4
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
4,005, Level: 14
Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 211
Thanks for the feedback.

From what I read it seems no one is happy with any 32" 100Hz set. I think I will buy a 14" B&W portable with coat hanger aereal

Bragelonne, I have read your thread re the panny. What exactly was wrong with the picture on sports etc.

Thanks
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 3:22 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Experience Points:
14,267, Level: 28
Points: 14,267, Level: 28 Points: 14,267, Level: 28 Points: 14,267, Level: 28
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 14, Got 22
Posts: 1,963
The problem with the Ph40 I have read many people complain about colour bleed, Smearing and leave trails behind. And I have seen it in shop with football on. Oh man it was awfull when the players runs it leaves a trail behind them.
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 5:36 PM   #6
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Staffordshire
Experience Points:
3,312, Level: 13
Points: 3,312, Level: 13 Points: 3,312, Level: 13 Points: 3,312, Level: 13
Activity: 0.3%
Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3% Activity: 0.3%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 18
Indeed, the blurring is unacceptable, but also, and this was especially noticeable on the Cricket recently, the players have massive outlines which aren't consistent i.e. they blur and shift around.

Simply not good enough
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 5:57 PM   #7
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
4,005, Level: 14
Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 211
Thanks Guys

Looks like its back to the drawing board.

I like the look of the Sony but it buzzes.

I like the look of the Panny, but the picture sucks (apparently)

Anyone recommend anything else for around a grand (1100 max).

Can anyone comment on the JVC?
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 6:07 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Experience Points:
14,267, Level: 28
Points: 14,267, Level: 28 Points: 14,267, Level: 28 Points: 14,267, Level: 28
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 14, Got 22
Posts: 1,963
Why not try another sony?

I honestly not heard a sony buzz yet. I have had 4 sony and none of them have buzz just had some picture problems ie white clouds and slope. But the 4th one is staying here which is a FQ80 as it spot on

My mate got a FQ80 and another mate got a LS60 Both of them dont buzz and they live on the same road as me.

It very strange
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 7:55 PM   #9
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
4,005, Level: 14
Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 211
Rookies,

It is strange. The buzzing I have is Scan coil related as opposed to PSU buzzing as the frequency changes depending upon what is on the screen. Sometimes it barley audible, others it is very noticeable.

I have spoken to Sony and they have said that some people notice it and some dont and it is dependent upon the environment and the individuals hearing frequency range.

To be honest my Wife barely notices it, but me and some friends find it annoying. (I know I have sensitive hearing as I howl everytime someone uses a dog whistle ).

I like the Sony but........

I am now getting kicked off as I dont know what to do. I spent ages deciding to go for the Sony over a Philips 9527. In the end it was all the comments on this forum about the Philips P+ picture that made me go for Sony.

I am now back to square 1. I have thought about getting a refund and waiting for the 32FX68. But I have read that it will retail at between 799 and 899. Compare that to the retail price of the 66 which is around 1100 (in know it can be bought cheaper). I cant see the quality of the 68 being as good as the 66 when you look at the price difference.

Just dont know what to do now. A friend has told me to go for a 50Hz. He has just sent a Philips 100Hz back and got a Panny 50Hz and is well happy.

(MODERATOR : circumventing swear filter. First warning of three. fraggle)

Last edited by ste1010; 11-03-2003 at 7:58 PM.
  Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 10:27 PM   #10
Prominent Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: St Albans
Experience Points:
12,577, Level: 26
Points: 12,577, Level: 26 Points: 12,577, Level: 26 Points: 12,577, Level: 26
Activity: 4.9%
Activity: 4.9% Activity: 4.9% Activity: 4.9%
Thanks: Gave 205, Got 940
Posts: 4,653
Quote:
Originally posted by ste1010

Just dont know what to do now. A friend has told me to go for a 50Hz. He has just sent a Philips 100Hz back and got a Panny 50Hz and is well happy.
I'd say he is a wise friend. If you are sensitive to 100Hz side effects, it is unlikely that you will be happy with any current 100Hz set. 100Hz sets fix a "problem" (flicker) that does not bother most people anyway but, in doing so, they introduce several other problems that annoy many people even more (motion blur, pixelisation, image lag, etc.).
  Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 2:46 PM   #11
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middlesbrough
Experience Points:
4,005, Level: 14
Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14 Points: 4,005, Level: 14
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 211
GaryB

Thanks. I am not sensitive to 100Hz problems. I like the picture on the Sony FX66. Its the buzzing that is a problem. I am trying to get feedback to see if the picture quality on the panny or jvc is to a similar level to the Sony. I find it hard to tell in the shop.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off