AVForums

Our philosophy in our forums, reviews, podcasts and feature videos is to promote audio and visual excellence by gathering and sharing the best information and resources available.

Help

To begin please visit our help section »

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Member Log in

DivX Conversion, does it preserve HD

Post Reply
Old 08-02-2006, 3:31 PM   #1
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Experience Points:
4,289, Level: 15
Points: 4,289, Level: 15 Points: 4,289, Level: 15 Points: 4,289, Level: 15
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0
Posts: 13
DivX Conversion, does it preserve HD

I have Showcentre 200 that is streaming mainly avi files wirelessly to my CRT Sony 32"TV with total success. I am shortly buying an HD Ready TV. The HD material (mpg) I have "acquired" will not stream wirelessly but is ok via a cat 5 cable. I would like however to connect my standalone Hard Disk with USB2 to the Showcentre via USB but am mindfuil of the FAT32/4gig limit
If I convert my HD content typically 6-10 gig, to DIVX I may be able to fit it on a 4 gig partition and stream locally via usb, but when i get my new telly, will the HD quality be preserved or is it lost in the conversion
Am I better running a cat5 cable and streaming from my pc, the other issue is space as even a very large hard disc fills up with HD material
Thanks
  Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 4:34 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mmace's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Experience Points:
8,848, Level: 22
Points: 8,848, Level: 22 Points: 8,848, Level: 22 Points: 8,848, Level: 22
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 27, Got 63
Posts: 1,222
it depends how you convert them
I use AutoGK and preserve the 5.1 audio and choose my resolution (keeping them HD).

You're still going to want a high bitrate though otherwise you'll get macroblocking

I've just finished converting Spider-Man 1 & 2 from TS files to DivX and the lowest I got them down to with no (or very little) macroblocking was just under 6Gb (9000kb/sec)

have you looked into x264?
you can use an even lower bitrate and keep the quality (3-4Gb films)
the only downside is the amount of time it takes to encode and the CPU power it takes to play (although nVidia are about to release an update to enable their cards to use hardware acceleration on them)
  Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 6:49 PM   #3
Prominent Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Experience Points:
16,091, Level: 30
Points: 16,091, Level: 30 Points: 16,091, Level: 30 Points: 16,091, Level: 30
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 38, Got 205
Posts: 3,444
Was going to suggest x.264 also but I read it can take something like three days to encode a film.
  Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 7:32 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
mmace's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Experience Points:
8,848, Level: 22
Points: 8,848, Level: 22 Points: 8,848, Level: 22 Points: 8,848, Level: 22
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Thanks: Gave 27, Got 63
Posts: 1,222
depends on the software, I did a 2 hour film the other day and it took around 36 hours using mainconcept on my PIV 3Ghz HT with 2Gb DDR RAM keeping it's resolution the same (720p)

am gonna try nero recode soon, from past experience it's quite fast
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off