Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Laurel&Hardy And I will assert that CRT is best. It isn't geometrically perfect and it has many flaws but overall a good CRT from Panny, Tosh and Sony amongst others tears Plasma and LCD to shreds when it comes down to WATCHING the thing, not admiring the theoretical advantages of contrast ratio and the lack of geometric flaws on test images. |
Each to their own, as they say. However,
- modern trends in broadcasting style with on-screen graphics, news tickers and the like
- the need to
properly display 4x3 material on a 16x9 screen
- letterboxed widesreen films
- etc
mean that it no longer takes a test signal to demonstrate - to the point of annoyance, (I'd say) deficiencies in CRT performance - variably curved edges to that 4x3 image; bouncing logos; tilted or curved edges to letterboxed films and/or text and/or graphics; colour impurities due to a nearby radiator and so on..
No platform is without its flaws. I'm sure that a theoretical well-made CRT hads the propensity to beat anything else, at present. Regretfully, for the reasons you rightly say, they are hard to come by (or even, don't exist).
Which is best depends on personal preference - which artefact is least intrusive to whoever is buying. I guess it would be a brave manufacturer, though, who brought out a large CRT costing a similar amount (or more, even) to a flat panel, but with performance fitting of its cost. It probably would be a flat-panel beater - but would enough folk buy one?