Quote:
Originally Posted by AlbaJoeReturns Are you saying you should stand further back to exaggerate the effect then? how does that principle work for cinema ..... the further you sit back ? .... and i thought it was also commonly thought the bigger the screen the better ? basically brining the screen closer to you. |
Yes; pop should be proportional to viewing distance as basically what you're doing is exaggerating the original camera position.
Say you perceive an image at 3' when you're viewing at 6'. If you now stand at 12' then the image should be seen at 6' etc. It's very easy to demonstrate this if you pause a virtual object in front of the screen. As you move towards the screen then the image recedes backwards. My TV is mounted almost diagonal to the entrance door to our lounge. If I enter when say an IMAX film is running and look up at the TV then it can be quite a shock as it looks like the Pacific ocean is pouring into the room

(if you walk in on the right scene)
Quote:
|
I cant say that I agree with you as yes the depth thing is all well and good but that doesnt entertain my kids or myself tbh. The 3D I would thing the majority of people picture things popping out at you. Certainly I did and I think that was most peoples appreciation.
|
But 3D is a complete experience which starts at the beginning of a film and finishes at the end. It's a bit like saying you saw a colour film and some scenes were simply breathtaking as the colours looked amazing - and then saying you didn't experience that in another film you watched - even though that film was also in colour.
So yes; some 3D films are more impressive than others but in every case they should all provide a better experience than watching in 2D (assuming same material)