Quote:
|
I'd like to know when we are actually going to be allowed to watch them, seeing as we pay for them in the first place.
|
Large prestige projects cannot be funded simply by the licence fee, but need to done in conjunction with other TV companies. Take a look at
any prestige project of the last few years and indeed the last couple of decades - they've all been co-productions, typically with American companies. The licence fee basically covers the run of the mill stuff like the endless dreary cookery and property improvement programmes that infest our screens.
In any case, licence payers do not 'own' the output - we are only entitled to receive the broadcast versions and there is no moral duty incumbent on the BBC to produce their programmes on DVD.
And the reason why there are so few (as yet) high definition DVDs is simple - it's still in many people's eyes an unproven medium. Paying for the preparation of HD and/or BR discs can bring the reaction from the same sort of people who think they 'own' the BBC of 'why oh why is licence payer's money being squandered on discs for a few rich gits and geeks?'.
FWIW, I agree that Robin Hood is not worthy of an HD release (I treasure the comments of one TV critic after some of the film from the first series was stolen necessitating a re-shoot, to the effect that it's a shame the thieves didn't steal every last reel). And yes, there are plenty of excellent HD programmes on the shelves (I for one would love to see Cranford and - from the sublime to the ridiculous - Rome). But we may have to be patient and wait for the medium to be taken up by a larger proportion of the population, simple as that.