Quote:
Originally Posted by colpurps  You are so right to moan Mike P. We have been sold up the river by this so-called government of ours, who are ruthlessly selling of the bandwidths to the highest bidders and the public-service broadcasters will not be able to afford to buy them, consequently you will never see HD as promised on the BBC except the odd one here and there. Satelite broadcasters will mop up all the channels. You will only be able to watch pap such as the commercials put out most of the time and what is more, you'll have to pay for it, HD or not. Now the gov. wants to sell the channels used for analogue presently, they just can't wait to cash in. If you are a pensioner, there is a chance you will remember the tales of the bomb-site car-selling spivs after the war? By golly, they've have nothing like the skills and cunning than this lot have. You have been warned. I am 76 this year, and I was looking forward to seeing the wild-life films in HD on digital TV on a suitable digibox. As they say, in your dreams!
Ray |
It is more the case that people have been mislead when purchasing their 'hd-ready' televisions.
Even if bandwidth could be allocated for hd freeview it would be 2012 before that could happen and even then you would need new equipment to receive it.
The BBC hd trial channel and any future hd channels they may broadcast over satellite are free to air and only require the right equipment to receive with no subscription to any other service be that sky or anyone else.
So in real terms the only difference between BBC HD over satellite or any future service over freeview would be the need for the satellite dish itself as both systems would require a new set top box.
There are some people who cannot have a satellite dish for one reason or another, as there are people who cannot receive a strong enough signal over freeview to make hd viable.
The ideal would be to have both in place, a limited freeview hd service and a much more comprehensive service over satellite but this would have to be paid by someone and I am not sure an increase in the licence fee to cover this would be acceptable to the majority of viewers.