Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Any thoughts on the Cambridge Stream Magic 6?

Post Reply
Old 17-06-2012, 8:30 AM   #1
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Penistone
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 27
Any thoughts on the Cambridge Stream Magic 6?

I've seen the cambridge stream magic 6 on the Richer Sounds website at gbp699. Has anyone got one and how do you rate it?
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 17-06-2012, 8:40 PM   #2
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks: Gave 94, Got 489
Posts: 4,441
It's basically a streamer with a built in DacMagic Plus. It's well made, sounds good, and the phone/tablet app is great. It's also particularly good at Internet radio. Misses out on native Airplay support, but I don't think that's major personally. FWIW an aptX Bluetooth dongle is available for it.
  Quote
Old 18-06-2012, 4:53 PM   #3
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
It is (if useful) also a digital preamp. It uses a DSP based volume control as well so no messy bit reduction or similar.
  Quote
Old 18-06-2012, 7:12 PM   #4
Moderator
amcluesent's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Glasgow
Thanks: Gave 199, Got 667
Posts: 4,009
Certainly has a sensible range of features, would have been nice to have an EAS/EBU digitl input; too bad Logitech lost the plot as this could have been the Transporter II in 2010. Will be interesting to see if they can hold the price point.

I wonder if it can do loop-back to insert a digital room correction processor?

Last edited by amcluesent; 18-06-2012 at 7:19 PM.
  Quote
Old 19-06-2012, 8:24 AM   #5
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks: Gave 94, Got 489
Posts: 4,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by amcluesent View Post
I wonder if it can do loop-back to insert a digital room correction processor?
wouldn't work. When you choose a digital input you can't access any other function.
  Quote
Old 19-06-2012, 8:44 AM   #6
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Penistone
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by YellowSphere
wouldn't work. When you choose a digital input you can't access any other function.
I was interested to see the specs mention 24bit 384khz up sampling. Whilst it will support 24/192 I wonder if this suggests some future proofing built in?

Whilst most of my downloads are mp3 or standard WAV files I have been experimenting with higher res downloads.

I have an old NAS which is not DNLA compliant so I would also need to look at a minimum 4TB NAS to replace it and a streamer like this one which I feel might offer a decent high res solution to play through my hi fi system.

These specs, at first glance, seem to offer an affordable way forward with up sampling 384 suggesting it is ready for even higher res options?

Your thoughts are welcome.
  Quote
Old 19-06-2012, 1:54 PM   #7
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadnutter View Post
I was interested to see the specs mention 24bit 384khz up sampling. Whilst it will support 24/192 I wonder if this suggests some future proofing built in?

Whilst most of my downloads are mp3 or standard WAV files I have been experimenting with higher res downloads.

I have an old NAS which is not DNLA compliant so I would also need to look at a minimum 4TB NAS to replace it and a streamer like this one which I feel might offer a decent high res solution to play through my hi fi system.

These specs, at first glance, seem to offer an affordable way forward with up sampling 384 suggesting it is ready for even higher res options?

Your thoughts are welcome.
At the moment, it tops out at 96kHz over ethernet and 192kHz over USB. The upsampling is then applied to all inputted signals. I'm not sure if it is capable of native 384kHz. Given that 192kHz files are already bulky and capable of a bandwidth higher than anything our brain is likely to process, I'm not completely sure I see the point.
  Quote
Old 20-06-2012, 9:04 AM   #8
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks: Gave 94, Got 489
Posts: 4,441
Agreed with the above post.
  Quote
Old 20-06-2012, 10:08 AM   #9
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Penistone
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 27
Ed Selley,
I agree with your point of view, but I am intrigued by this "384khz upsampling" which suggests some potential for "future proofing"
Anyway, I am sure it will be some while before 384khz is available natively. So, given it supports 192khz albeit over USB which is not a problem, it does seem to be quite good value unless I am missing the point.
It seems that CAMBRIDGE (through Richer Sounds) seem to be producing some good kit at the moment.
Many thanks to everyone for their feedback. I guess the best thing to do is go and listen to the kit. It does not look like anyone on the forum has one of these yet?
  Quote
Old 20-06-2012, 11:00 AM   #10
Moderator
amcluesent's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Glasgow
Thanks: Gave 199, Got 667
Posts: 4,009
Quote:
I am intrigued by this "384khz upsampling"
Yep, Linn make a thing of their own upsampling DSP before the DAC in Majik DS and above, and s/w releases actually improve the sound as they implement smarter filters etc. Would be good to know if Cambridge have a configurable DSP or are using an off-the-shelf chipset.
  Quote
Old 20-06-2012, 11:00 AM   #11
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadnutter View Post
Ed Selley,
I agree with your point of view, but I am intrigued by this "384khz upsampling" which suggests some potential for "future proofing"
It first appeared on Cambridge Audio products in 2006 with the 840C. The idea as I understand it is that it gives enough "samples" to create a true polynomial curve. I don't think it necessarily translates that the entire board is 384kHz capable though.

EDIT
Quote:
Originally Posted by amcluesent View Post
Would be good to know if Cambridge have a configurable DSP or are using an off-the-shelf chipset.
The parts used in the circuit are standard but of reasonably high spec. The software that makes it happen is bespoke and was developed in partnership with a Swiss firm Anagram Technologies.

Last edited by Ed Selley; 20-06-2012 at 11:03 AM.
  Quote
Old 20-06-2012, 7:05 PM   #12
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Penistone
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 2
Posts: 27
Interestingly What HiFi have just done a review. Hopefully this link will work http://www.whathifi.com/review/cambr...icle1_readmore
  Quote
Old 21-06-2012, 8:31 AM   #13
Member
therixonator's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 36
Posts: 503
Hifi News also has a feature in the latest issue on network audio players. Think they've reviewed 5 also including the marantz, the pioneer and the meridian.
  Quote
Old 21-06-2012, 9:45 AM   #14
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks: Gave 94, Got 489
Posts: 4,441
I think CA basically own Anagram Technologies now.
  Quote
Old 22-06-2012, 11:57 PM   #15
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Posts: 3
I bought one last week and I have to say it is superb. Set up was 15 minutes & very straightforward. First thing was to check for firmware update, then we were ready to roll.

I am ripping to a USB HDD in Ogg Vorbis.

Sounds fantastic, and once I get the structure of my HDD sorted it will be a piece of cake to find stuff.

The Android is simple and intuitive.

Really can't fault it (yet).
  Quote
Old 27-06-2012, 7:05 PM   #16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Out of my mind on dope and speed
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 140
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppipolla View Post
I bought one last week and I have to say it is superb. Set up was 15 minutes & very straightforward. First thing was to check for firmware update, then we were ready to roll.

I am ripping to a USB HDD in Ogg Vorbis.

Sounds fantastic, and once I get the structure of my HDD sorted it will be a piece of cake to find stuff.

The Android is simple and intuitive.

Really can't fault it (yet).
Did you compare it with any other products? I'm planning a listening session this weekend to compare the Naim ND5 XS, the Musical Fidelity M1CLiC and some Linn thingy. Would like to save myself over a grand if possible if the CA is up to it!
  Quote
Old 27-06-2012, 9:17 PM   #17
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by GW43 View Post
Did you compare it with any other products? I'm planning a listening session this weekend to compare the Naim ND5 XS, the Musical Fidelity M1CLiC and some Linn thingy. Would like to save myself over a grand if possible if the CA is up to it!
I listened to Naim Uniti/SuprUniti and the Linn one, and the naim was streets ahead IMO. Having said that I wasn't sure that the Linn Kans I have would have done the Naim justice. Space is a bit of a premium for me, so bigger speakers are not an option. I therefore decided that the Stream Magic was the right product for me and my listening environment.

It feeds an Azur 640A and I am also listening through Audio Technica ATH-M50 headphones, and the improvement on what I could hear from my Azur 540C CD player is staggering to me.

I couldn't justify the extra £1500 for the Naim, and I doubt I would be able to tell the difference in my little house.

The Stream Magic really should be auditioned. It is as good as What Hi-Fi says.

HTH
  Quote
Thanks from:
GW43 (30-06-2012)
Old 28-06-2012, 12:15 PM   #18
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
I've got an ND5 XS and a Stream Magic 6. The Naim is better but given it is £1,300 more, that isn't really a reflection on the Stream Magic 6. I can't think of a streamer sub £1k that is better than the Cambridge unless you are absolutely convinced that 192kHz files are going to take off in a big way.
  Quote
Old 29-06-2012, 6:01 PM   #19
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Thanks: Gave 22, Got 5
Posts: 127
Demoed one of these today and it's a stunning piece of kit. One of those things you really have to have. Arggghhhhh.
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 1:35 AM   #20
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Thanks: Gave 94, Got 489
Posts: 4,441
Ed, don't forget you still have some provision for 192KHz via USB.
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 9:48 AM   #21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Out of my mind on dope and speed
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 140
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Selley View Post
I've got an ND5 XS and a Stream Magic 6. The Naim is better but given it is £1,300 more, that isn't really a reflection on the Stream Magic 6. I can't think of a streamer sub £1k that is better than the Cambridge unless you are absolutely convinced that 192kHz files are going to take off in a big way.
Could you be more specific in terms of the Naim being better? At almost 3 times the price it ought to be, but I guess it will be nowhere near three times better!

Cheers!
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 7:52 PM   #22
Member
** Verve **'s Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sunny Devon
Thanks: Gave 56, Got 21
Posts: 321
I've been looking to get a streamer to go with my CA 650a and 650c. Was originally looking at getting a Squeezebox touch, but tempted by one of these. What would the advantages be of this over the Touch?

I presume the higher quality DAC would mean better sound. Apparently this can also be used a digital pre-amp too, but what does that mean in real term uses, what could I do with it? Could I use the optical out on the 650c and input into this to improve the sound?

I'm also looking at trying out some hi-res audio, would this be significantly better than the Squeezebox for handling hi-res formats?

I've also read that this doesn't support spotify, is there another way I could use spotify with this?

Thanks in advance and sorry for the noobish questions!
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 10:13 PM   #23
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by GW43 View Post
Could you be more specific in terms of the Naim being better? At almost 3 times the price it ought to be, but I guess it will be nowhere near three times better!

Cheers!
The Naim is voiced to sound like other recent bits of Naim digital- quite "dark" with real low end shove to it. I actually believe the Stream Magic 6 might actually be more accurate but in subjective personal preference, I like the Naim sound. The Stream Magic is wonderfully neutral though- like other Cambridge Audio Digital products it is perfect if you either want to have an accurate system or induce colouration somewhere else in the system.

Features wise it is swings and roundabouts- the Naim has direct Apple device connectivity, the Cambridge Audio has a preamp and a bluetooth option. Given how close this is, the Stream Magic 6 is excellent value for money.
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 10:20 PM   #24
Moderator
amcluesent's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Glasgow
Thanks: Gave 199, Got 667
Posts: 4,009
I see a s/w update is awaited before it'll support gapless. C'mon, son!
  Quote
Old 30-06-2012, 11:09 PM   #25
AVF Reviewer
Ed Selley's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Thanks: Gave 66, Got 1,418
Posts: 8,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by amcluesent View Post
I see a s/w update is awaited before it'll support gapless. C'mon, son!
That's being tested at the moment and should be released pretty soon.
  Quote
Old 26-07-2012, 9:40 PM   #26
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 1
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Selley View Post
That's being tested at the moment and should be released pretty soon.
And it's out now.

Works perfectly. This was the only thing I didn't like about it, but when I found there would be firmware updates I took the plunge.

The quality of detail from it is fantastic. I am chuffed to bits with it.
  Quote
Old 16-01-2013, 1:20 PM   #27
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Thanks: Gave 14, Got 23
Posts: 355
Hi,
These are now £599 in RS.
So do I go and see Uncle Julian or buy a secondhand MK 1 Transporter?
Cheers,
Gavin
  Quote
Old 16-01-2013, 2:02 PM   #28
Distinguished Member
Crocodile's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Thanks: Gave 544, Got 1,751
Posts: 11,062
Transporter is a bit of risk IMO. It may well give many more years of trouble free service but if something does go wrong, it's an instant brick. Logitech never offered any out of warranty service on these when they were still being sold! But at least you had a chance of leaning on them for a replacement. Now you'd be completely stuffed.

Remember that one of the driving forces behind the Touch was that Logitech could no longer source the displays for the SB3. The same displays that are in the Transporter. And that was what, three years ago?

But then I've read of a less than inspiring case where RS/CA wouldn't repair an NP30 under warranty as they considered it uneconomical. But at least the buyer was refunded. So I'd say if you go for the Stream 6, the RS extended warranty is essential.
  Quote
Old 16-01-2013, 2:57 PM   #29
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Thanks: Gave 14, Got 23
Posts: 355
Hi,
I really like the look of the Transporter, but as you rightly say if anything goes wrong you've got a new door stop.
Another thing to consider, is that there won't be any software/firmware updates from Logitech, but then again the android app from CA isn't much good by all accounts... but at least there's some chance of it getting sorted...
Cheers,
Gavin
  Quote
Old 16-01-2013, 4:55 PM   #30
Distinguished Member
Crocodile's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Thanks: Gave 544, Got 1,751
Posts: 11,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gavinbat View Post
Hi,
I really like the look of the Transporter, but as you rightly say if anything goes wrong you've got a new door stop.
I'd always wanted one & was sorely tempted by that thread as well, but IMO it's just too much of a risk. Can't believe he knocked you back for the price of a courier.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off