Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

Digitising CD's - Codecs, formats and the software needed

View Poll Results: What is your format of choice? (Multiple Choice)
Wav 35 10.06%
Flac 242 69.54%
Apple Lossless 56 16.09%
WMA Lossless 9 2.59%
MP3 103 29.60%
WMA 6 1.72%
AAC 16 4.60%
Ogg Vorbis 4 1.15%
Online Music Store Subscription or downloads 8 2.30%
Other format (post below!) 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 348. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
Old 02-04-2012, 10:03 AM   #31
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 3
Posts: 14
Thank you all for the suggestions, my Q was moved here, so I did not find it until now. will read all info.
thanks again
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 09-04-2012, 11:59 AM   #32
Member
Maxson's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Southampton
Thanks: Gave 141, Got 60
Posts: 746
I definitely prefer to buy in FLAC. Why buy lossy mp3 when space is not really an issue any more? If I can't buy in FLAC then I will buy the CD and rip to FLAC using Exact Audio Copy. Then I will fix the artwork with bliss. Sorted and ready to play on my Squeezebox Touch!

See my thread on buying music in FLAC and please add links to good music! Great Music in FLAC/WAV and where to buy!
  Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 12:29 PM   #33
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 3
Posts: 14
Thank U, have decided to go with FLAC, as that seem to be the preferred option of most. will also check out your buying links, as there there soon are no more record shops around, and I refuse iTunes shop
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 10:12 AM   #34
Member
Gixxerblade's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Thanks: Gave 20, Got 45
Posts: 462
(Moved to this thread from the thread below by mod)
NAS and Windows 9.2 Lossless

The file type is wma though not 9.2 and wma-l is lossless (windows media audio-lossless) which he is comparing to flac (free lossless audio codec).

I have seen some people say they hear differences between flac and wav, I use wma-l myself and couldn't pick out a difference between it and wav or flac but if you can then I would use the one you prefer.

Last edited by Gixxerblade; 07-07-2012 at 12:46 PM. Reason: This posted moved from another thread.
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 10:40 AM   #35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cambridge
Thanks: Gave 48, Got 349
Posts: 2,386
The current file/codec version of WMA-L is 9.2 About the Windows Media Codecs (Windows)

Last edited by larkone; 07-07-2012 at 10:42 AM.
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 12:17 PM   #36
Member
Gixxerblade's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Thanks: Gave 20, Got 45
Posts: 462
(Moved to this thread from the thread below by mod)
NAS and Windows 9.2 Lossless

Quote:
Originally Posted by larkone View Post
The current file/codec version of WMA-L is 9.2 About the Windows Media Codecs (Windows)
Can you show me a screen shot that shows 9.2 as a file type as that is what the op is talking about?

Quote:
I would like to rip my cd's to windows 9.2 lossless as I understand that it's the "best" file type.

Last edited by Gixxerblade; 07-07-2012 at 12:45 PM. Reason: This posted moved from another thread.
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 12:34 PM   #37
Veteran Member
Trollslayer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bristol
Thanks: Gave 741, Got 924
Posts: 7,182
FLAC is losseless and supports tags so suits me fine.
CDex handles everything for me.
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 1:02 PM   #38
Senior Moderator
Steven's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Blog Entries: 45
Thanks: Gave 2,339, Got 5,123
Posts: 34,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gixxerblade View Post
I have seen some people say they hear differences between flac and wav, I use wma-l myself and couldn't pick out a difference between it and wav or flac but if you can then I would use the one you prefer.
But if you cannot hear the difference yourself then why would you forgo the technical advantages of flac (comprehensive tagging, smaller filesize) over wav just because someone with different ears has a different perception?
  Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 1:12 PM   #39
Member
Gixxerblade's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Thanks: Gave 20, Got 45
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven View Post
But if you cannot hear the difference yourself then why would you forgo the technical advantages of flac (comprehensive tagging, smaller filesize) over wav just because someone with different ears has a different perception?
The comment relates to a different thread.
NAS and Windows 9.2 Lossless

I have no idea why it was moved here. To answer your question though they shouldn't - they should use whatever they prefer that suits their usage. I use a mixture of file formats including flac and wav but the majority are wma-l, I have no particular preference and use whatever I feel like using when ripping CDs. My comment was not meant for this thread.

Last edited by Gixxerblade; 07-07-2012 at 1:39 PM. Reason: thread link
  Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 3:19 PM   #40
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
Question about ripped cd with (EAC) Exact Audio Copy

Hi, I loaded my Dire Straits Brothers in Arms (SACD) into the cd tray and started up EAC but the data base only came back with a standard Brothers in Arms CD, not a SACD, so I went a long with that.
After ripping the Stereo layer of the (SACD) I thought it was ok as it says at the end of the logfile
"All tracks accurately ripped, No errors occurred, End of status report.
But after that at the bottom it says "You can use CUETools to repair this rip".
What does this mean ? repair the rip with cuetools, when I thought that the rip had been accurately ripped.
I Would appreciate an explanation
Here is the logfile

Exact Audio Copy V1.0 beta 3 from 29. August 2011

EAC extraction logfile from 3. October 2012, 20:00

Dire Straits / Brothers in Arms

Used drive : MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ-850S Adapter: 1 ID: 0

Read mode : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction : 102
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations : Yes
Used interface : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000
Gap handling : Appended to previous track

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

Track | Start | Length | Start sector | End sector
---------------------------------------------------------
1 | 0:00.00 | 5:12.20 | 0 | 23419
2 | 5:12.20 | 8:25.60 | 23420 | 61354
3 | 13:38.05 | 4:12.37 | 61355 | 80291
4 | 17:50.42 | 6:33.65 | 80292 | 109831
5 | 24:24.32 | 8:30.73 | 109832 | 148154
6 | 32:55.30 | 6:58.00 | 148155 | 179504
7 | 39:53.30 | 4:40.17 | 179505 | 200521
8 | 44:33.47 | 3:40.05 | 200522 | 217026
9 | 48:13.52 | 6:59.58 | 217027 | 248509


Track 1

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\01 - So Far Away - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.00

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 0.8 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 04331C97
Accurately ripped (confidence 89) [53CE6B94] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 2

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\02 - Money for Nothing - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 0.9 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 051F214D
Accurately ripped (confidence 89) [6E3F966C] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 3

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\03 - Walk of Life - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:01.46

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.0 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC AE390C27
Accurately ripped (confidence 88) [695BC006] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 4

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\04 - Your Latest Trick - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:03.60

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.1 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 126DB23E
Accurately ripped (confidence 89) [63896B70] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 5

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\05 - Why Worry - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:04.53

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.2 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC FEC19A7F
Accurately ripped (confidence 89) [C859F565] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 6

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\06 - Ride Across the River - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:07.80

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.2 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC F0CB86E5
Accurately ripped (confidence 89) [FFEF227B] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 7

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\07 - The Man's Too Strong - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.4 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC C645819A
Accurately ripped (confidence 87) [41A45F15] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 8

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\08 - One World - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.16

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.2 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC A12C9453
Accurately ripped (confidence 86) [C85A8DDE] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 9

Filename C:\WAV Music Files\09 - Brothers in Arms - Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms - 1985.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.80

Peak level 98.8 %
Extraction speed 1.5 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 31EBE1DA
Accurately ripped (confidence 86) [77DA5AFE] (AR v2)
Copy OK


All tracks accurately ripped

No errors occurred

End of status report

---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.1.3

[CTDB TOCID: FhuOllXhT7sAE0942nFgmdX0cfQ-] found, Submit result: FhuOllXhT7sAE0942nFgmdX0cfQ- has been confirmed
[1e1d87a4] (025/328) Differs in 19 samples @05:07:69,05:12:35,13:36:38,17:44:23,24:19:62,24:2 4:46,39:53:43,44:33:60,48:13:67,55:04:45
[5a486604] (300/328) Accurately ripped
[45d40355] (001/328) No match
[b89bb797] (001/328) No match
[0192e314] (001/328) No match
You can use CUETools to repair this rip.

Last edited by JUST ROCK; 05-10-2012 at 4:22 PM.
  Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 4:25 PM   #41
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 55
Posts: 860
as its near a Master Disc as you will get , its copy protected !!
  Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 5:15 PM   #42
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
Oh ok. The ripped sacd does sound great, its a lot better than the remaster cd that is out. So I guess if it says
All tracks accurately ripped I will leave it at that.
  Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 5:34 PM   #43
Veteran Member
andy1249's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Thanks: Gave 51, Got 1,150
Posts: 5,777
Theres nothing to worry about here really ,

This first part ,

Quote:
[CTDB TOCID: FhuOllXhT7sAE0942nFgmdX0cfQ-] found, Submit result: FhuOllXhT7sAE0942nFgmdX0cfQ- has been confirmed
[1e1d87a4] (025/328) Differs in 19 samples @05:07:69,05:12:35,13:36:38,17:44:23,24:19:62,24:2 4:46,39:53:43,44:33:60,48:13:67,55:04:45
It sees a problem with the TOCID , thats the Table of Contents , which , seeing as your comparing the SACD to a Standard CD , is to be expected.

The numbers after "Differs in 19 samples" are roughly the start times of each track , which are slightly different on the SACD , again this is to be expected.

Other than that , your rip is fine.

It is very often the case that people just use the database entry for track names and don't concern themselves with whether or not the entry they are using is ripped from the same master/pressing.

As such , a lot of the data in the accurate rip database is incorrect. Especially with titles like this that have so many different releases.

That is usually OK so long as no features are enabled in the ripping software that will actually act on that incorrect data to modify your rip.

As you can see from the confidence figures , you are not the first person to rip the SACD CD layer using the database entry from the standard CD.

Incidentally , I have that same SACD , and I get the same CRC's as you , I always "test and copy" , so I have the same CRC's twice.

Last edited by andy1249; 05-10-2012 at 5:39 PM.
  Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 7:30 PM   #44
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
Thanks for your replies. It is very true that there is so many versions of cds nowadays especially with all these remasters coming out. Hopefully my ripped cds are ok, they have "All tracks accurately ripped" in the logfile.
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 9:17 AM   #45
Member
martin 39's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 15
Posts: 331
ripping cds

hi all have started to rip my music collection but seeing as i know nothing about this i need some help please . need to no should i rip to 24 or 16 bit and on the hrz should i use 48000 41000 96000 or just leave it on auto . i have tried this and on 48000 it gives me a kbps at 1300 and if auto its 896 but this means nothing to me any help please thanks guys
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 10:19 AM   #46
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cambridge
Thanks: Gave 48, Got 349
Posts: 2,386
There is no point in ripping a CD higher than 16/44 FLAC as it will not give any better sound. Ripping in this format will give sound quality equal to the original CD.
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 11:18 AM   #47
Member
martin 39's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 15
Posts: 331
Thanks just what I needed to know . Does it matter if some have been ripped higher or not
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 11:23 AM   #48
Member
therixonator's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 36
Posts: 502
It only matters for 2 reasons really, 1 is space as they'll take up more room. The other is whether your player can handle the format. For example Sonos can't play back 24bit codecs.
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 11:30 AM   #49
Member
therixonator's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 36
Posts: 502
Btw Martin, have read of the sticky in this section about ripping cds. It helped me no end. It's a big job that you really only want to do once.

Also backup, backup, back up! My method is to rip to my pc, and use synctoy to copy to my Nas and an external harddrive. Then I keep the hdd at work and just bring it home when I have lots of new albums.
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 11:58 AM   #50
Member
martin 39's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: Gave 4, Got 15
Posts: 331
Thanks again I'm just getting into this as I never thought I would . Not long got a arcam avr400 . And find It better than my old roksan Caspian . So tried ripping a few cds and was amazed how good it sounded . So just looking for best ways to do this .would a r dac help the sound .
  Quote
Old 14-10-2012, 12:27 PM   #51
Member
therixonator's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Thanks: Gave 13, Got 36
Posts: 502
I not heard the arcam so I can't really comment but the rdac is a very good dac for the money. I had one for a couple of years and it has served me well. Very simple to use, minimal controls and it made a massive difference to my system at the time.

I have since upgraded to the audiolab mdac which I'm very happy with too. But it's a different sort of dac really. It needs configuring to get the best out of it, but you do get a lot more choice and features. Plus the support you get from the designer John Westlake is the best I've come across in any product I've ever bought. Audio or not.

But it does cost twice as much as an rdac. Find a shop that sells your gear and test dacs for yourself. Or get a home demo if you can.
  Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 3:49 PM   #52
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
Hi all, I ripped my cd and after rip it says (All tracks accurately ripped, No errors occurred)
So I presume the rip is accurate but I was curious to know what all the (No match) at the end of Log file is all about, should I be concerned about that bit ?
Please could someone explain this for me


Exact Audio Copy V1.0 beta 3 from 29. August 2011

EAC extraction logfile from 1. December 2012, 20:30

Led Zeppelin / Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered)

Used drive : MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ-850S Adapter: 1 ID: 0

Read mode : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction : 102
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations : Yes
Used interface : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000
Gap handling : Appended to previous track

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

Track | Start | Length | Start sector | End sector
---------------------------------------------------------
1 | 0:00.00 | 2:47.40 | 0 | 12564
2 | 2:47.40 | 2:28.41 | 12565 | 23705
3 | 5:16.06 | 6:28.07 | 23706 | 52812
4 | 11:44.13 | 6:41.72 | 52813 | 82959
5 | 18:26.10 | 5:32.71 | 82960 | 107930
6 | 23:59.06 | 4:22.22 | 107931 | 127602
7 | 28:21.28 | 4:15.42 | 127603 | 146769
8 | 32:36.70 | 2:26.69 | 146770 | 157788
9 | 35:03.64 | 7:23.72 | 157789 | 191085
10 | 42:27.61 | 3:41.16 | 191086 | 207676
11 | 46:09.02 | 4:54.69 | 207677 | 229795
12 | 51:03.71 | 7:10.20 | 229796 | 262065
13 | 58:14.16 | 8:02.23 | 262066 | 298238


Track 1

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\01 - Good Times Bad Times - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.00

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC A956677D
Accurately ripped (confidence 124) [98C163B5] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 2

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\02 - Communication Breakdown - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.42

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC FE696ED9
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [A32CF662] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 3

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\03 - Dazed And Confused - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.64

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.9 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC FAC6E3F9
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [4E47AD60] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 4

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\04 - Babe I'm Gonna Leave You - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:01.49

Peak level 99.7 %
Extraction speed 1.1 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 270250CB
Accurately ripped (confidence 126) [B373A586] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 5

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\05 - Whole Lotta Love - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.64

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.0 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC BAA0A14E
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [A220A370] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 6

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\06 - Ramble On - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.38

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.0 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC CA1491F8
Accurately ripped (confidence 126) [52E14B80] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 7

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\07 - Heartbreaker - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.40

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.2 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 42BEDFC3
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [B9823480] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 8

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\08 - Immigrant Song - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.78

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.1 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC B4111571
Accurately ripped (confidence 123) [87A53562] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 9

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\09 - Since I've Been Loving You - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.92

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.4 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 0D5423F4
Accurately ripped (confidence 121) [21F549E5] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 10

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\10 - Rock And Roll - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.78

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.4 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC BE48F391
Accurately ripped (confidence 122) [33A019BB] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 11

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\11 - Black Dog - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.62

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.5 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC D1AAC5DE
Accurately ripped (confidence 124) [4458F467] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 12

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\12 - When The Levee Breaks - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.56

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.5 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC 095326AA
Accurately ripped (confidence 122) [08B27F7A] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 13

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\13 - Stairway To Heaven - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.20

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 4E8E5A2A
Accurately ripped (confidence 121) [897653C7] (AR v2)
Copy OK


All tracks accurately ripped

No errors occurred

End of status report

---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.1.3

[CTDB TOCID: w9F4JBPZfXBSA5hZ_nMvzIZxoCQ-] found, Submit result: already submitted
[90f0f5af] (694/722) Accurately ripped
[d08fe270] (001/722) No match
[26657d67] (001/722) No match
[a503e30e] (001/722) No match
[30c472ab] (001/722) No match
[068174cd] (001/722) No match
[70f42bf2] (001/722) No match
[07ff8ef4] (001/722) No match
[3f00c71e] (001/722) No match
[5da60adf] (001/722) No match
[92b9df11] (001/722) No match
[291aadc3] (001/722) No match
[080659eb] (001/722) No match
[6a9b0193] (001/722) No match
[d1b9118a] (001/722) No match
[a6787e5b] (001/722) No match
[59eca8fe] (001/722) No match
[e39bb263] (001/722) No match
[ba848fda] (001/722) No match
[883a4c6a] (001/722) No match
[db8bcadb] (001/722) No match
[d0ec1b0e] (001/722) No match
[9cff4afa] (001/722) No match
[d08e40cc] (001/722) No match
[836055c5] (001/722) No match
[7597d011] (001/722) No match
[4431b30c] (001/722) No match
[464a88a2] (001/722) No match
[dc7fb8a6] (001/722) No match

Last edited by JUST ROCK; 02-12-2012 at 3:56 PM.
  Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 1:19 AM   #53
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
Query over ripped cd using (EAC) Exact Audio Copy

I ripped my cd and after rip it says (All tracks accurately ripped, No errors occurred)
So I presume the rip is accurate but I was curious to know what all the (No match) at the end of Log file is all about, should I be concerned about that bit ?
Please could someone explain this for me


Exact Audio Copy V1.0 beta 3 from 29. August 2011

EAC extraction logfile from 1. December 2012, 20:30

Led Zeppelin / Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered)

Used drive : MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ-850S Adapter: 1 ID: 0

Read mode : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction : 102
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations : Yes
Used interface : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000
Gap handling : Appended to previous track

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

Track | Start | Length | Start sector | End sector
---------------------------------------------------------
1 | 0:00.00 | 2:47.40 | 0 | 12564
2 | 2:47.40 | 2:28.41 | 12565 | 23705
3 | 5:16.06 | 6:28.07 | 23706 | 52812
4 | 11:44.13 | 6:41.72 | 52813 | 82959
5 | 18:26.10 | 5:32.71 | 82960 | 107930
6 | 23:59.06 | 4:22.22 | 107931 | 127602
7 | 28:21.28 | 4:15.42 | 127603 | 146769
8 | 32:36.70 | 2:26.69 | 146770 | 157788
9 | 35:03.64 | 7:23.72 | 157789 | 191085
10 | 42:27.61 | 3:41.16 | 191086 | 207676
11 | 46:09.02 | 4:54.69 | 207677 | 229795
12 | 51:03.71 | 7:10.20 | 229796 | 262065
13 | 58:14.16 | 8:02.23 | 262066 | 298238


Track 1

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\01 - Good Times Bad Times - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.00

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC A956677D
Accurately ripped (confidence 124) [98C163B5] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 2

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\02 - Communication Breakdown - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.42

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC FE696ED9
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [A32CF662] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 3

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\03 - Dazed And Confused - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.64

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 0.9 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC FAC6E3F9
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [4E47AD60] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 4

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\04 - Babe I'm Gonna Leave You - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:01.49

Peak level 99.7 %
Extraction speed 1.1 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 270250CB
Accurately ripped (confidence 126) [B373A586] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 5

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\05 - Whole Lotta Love - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.64

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.0 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC BAA0A14E
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [A220A370] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 6

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\06 - Ramble On - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.38

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.0 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC CA1491F8
Accurately ripped (confidence 126) [52E14B80] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 7

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\07 - Heartbreaker - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.40

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.2 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 42BEDFC3
Accurately ripped (confidence 125) [B9823480] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 8

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\08 - Immigrant Song - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.78

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.1 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC B4111571
Accurately ripped (confidence 123) [87A53562] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 9

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\09 - Since I've Been Loving You - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.92

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.4 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 0D5423F4
Accurately ripped (confidence 121) [21F549E5] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 10

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\10 - Rock And Roll - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.78

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.4 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC BE48F391
Accurately ripped (confidence 122) [33A019BB] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 11

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\11 - Black Dog - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.62

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.5 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC D1AAC5DE
Accurately ripped (confidence 124) [4458F467] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 12

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\12 - When The Levee Breaks - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:00.56

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.5 X
Track quality 99.9 %
Copy CRC 095326AA
Accurately ripped (confidence 122) [08B27F7A] (AR v2)
Copy OK

Track 13

Filename G:\Wav Music Files\13 - Stairway To Heaven - Led Zeppelin - Mothership - Disc 1 (Digitally Remastered) - 2007.wav

Pre-gap length 0:00:02.20

Peak level 99.8 %
Extraction speed 1.7 X
Track quality 100.0 %
Copy CRC 4E8E5A2A
Accurately ripped (confidence 121) [897653C7] (AR v2)
Copy OK


All tracks accurately ripped

No errors occurred

End of status report

---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.1.3

[CTDB TOCID: w9F4JBPZfXBSA5hZ_nMvzIZxoCQ-] found, Submit result: already submitted
[90f0f5af] (694/722) Accurately ripped
[d08fe270] (001/722) No match
[26657d67] (001/722) No match
[a503e30e] (001/722) No match
[30c472ab] (001/722) No match
[068174cd] (001/722) No match
[70f42bf2] (001/722) No match
[07ff8ef4] (001/722) No match
[3f00c71e] (001/722) No match
[5da60adf] (001/722) No match
[92b9df11] (001/722) No match
[291aadc3] (001/722) No match
[080659eb] (001/722) No match
[6a9b0193] (001/722) No match
[d1b9118a] (001/722) No match
[a6787e5b] (001/722) No match
[59eca8fe] (001/722) No match
[e39bb263] (001/722) No match
[ba848fda] (001/722) No match
[883a4c6a] (001/722) No match
[db8bcadb] (001/722) No match
[d0ec1b0e] (001/722) No match
[9cff4afa] (001/722) No match
[d08e40cc] (001/722) No match
[836055c5] (001/722) No match
[7597d011] (001/722) No match
[4431b30c] (001/722) No match
[464a88a2] (001/722) No match
[dc7fb8a6] (001/722) No match
  Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 9:18 AM   #54
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cambridge
Thanks: Gave 48, Got 349
Posts: 2,386
It is CUETools messages - see here for expalnations CUETools log - CUETools wiki

More here

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/...howtopic=96156

Last edited by larkone; 08-12-2012 at 9:21 AM.
  Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 12:43 PM   #55
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
So I presume my ripped cd is ok then, with the No match on log file ?
  Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 6:09 PM   #56
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nottingham
Thanks: Gave 39, Got 14
Posts: 491
Apart from batch converting and multi core processing is there any other reason why I would want to purchase dBpoweramp over using the free EAC? I'm willing to make the investment if there is a reason to, like rip quality or something.
  Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 6:54 PM   #57
Moderator
amcluesent's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Glasgow
Thanks: Gave 199, Got 667
Posts: 4,005
Quote:
like rip quality or something.
AFAIK, EAC has always been the benchmark for rip quality. If you've mastered EAC, I can't see any reason to change.
  Quote
Thanks from:
badsoden (12-12-2012)
Old 12-12-2012, 7:40 PM   #58
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nottingham
Thanks: Gave 39, Got 14
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by amcluesent View Post
AFAIK, EAC has always been the benchmark for rip quality. If you've mastered EAC, I can't see any reason to change.
That's good to hear, I'm already 100 or so CD's into ripping a collection and just wanted to check I was using the right software! I've used the guides mentioned to set up EAC and I'm happy with the process I just wanted to check that I wasn't missing anything available in a paid for application. I'm also in no hurry so I'm ripping them as and when I have time so I'm not too bothered about speeding the process up which is what dBpoweramp seems to offer over EAC.
  Quote
Old 13-12-2012, 3:48 PM   #59
Member
JUST ROCK's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Thanks: Gave 7, Got 14
Posts: 269
I think that the slower ripping that EAC does is better because you get better results rather than a high speed rip from dbpoweramp.
  Quote
Old 17-12-2012, 1:14 PM   #60
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nottingham
Thanks: Gave 39, Got 14
Posts: 491
After thinking I had mastered EAC I've found a problem with some mix CD's showing as having gaps when they shouldn't. I've tried the different gap detection options but get the same results.
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off