Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RMCF Totally agree overkill.
I have been thinking the same as Beckenbauer for years now. I mean why risk the 'top' players in matches against people who have no hope of winning.
You are risking taking players onto unnecessary flights, getting badly tackled by a postman from Andorra out to make a name for himself, plus adding to the number of games that these players have to play in a season. We always hearing moaning about people being tired and thats affecting the standard of the major games/tournaments, yet we drag the 'elite' to the Faroes to win 0-3 easily.
Take that game England played today - what is the point? It doesn't improve Andorra in any way. They are coming sightseeing, to keep the score down as low as possible and then rush around like star-struck teenagers at the final whistle to get Gerrards shirt for their kids!! Its making a mess of football.
I think that putting all the brock in a group or two and letting them play each other before they meet the big boys is the only way forward. They might not get the opportunity to play against the best, but sure when they do they don't attack. But they will play against players at their own level and may even score international goals and win the odd game. Their morale will improve and they might enjoy playing for their country. We filter out the small teams (rightly or wrongly) at club level with the CL and UEFA Cup seedings - so why not at international level? |
I would agree myself, but the reason it's frowned upon is that it's hardly democratic, and unlike the smaller nations club sides, it's harder to ignore a
nations complaints at being regarded as '2nd class'.
They (the smaller nations and elements of FIFA) would also argue that only by playing the larger nations sides will theirs improve. Denmark and Norway, once 'whipping boys', are used as evidence of this. However, I would counter that by saying that the likes Luxembourg etc, have
never improved and are still, decade after decade, 'whipping boys'. This is perhaps inevitable, as they just don't have the populous to produce a pool of top quality players. No insult intended to that nation.
The problem is also compounded by who gets seeded into that first round of qualifying? The likes of Latvia, who, let's not forget, qualified for the last Euro finals? Further, and this is quite obviously a political thing, why is it then that in other continents apart from Europe and South America, there
is pre-qualifying?
It's a sticky question, no?