Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Abbeygoo Quality post. The people who subscribe to the long ball theory seem to get their opinions from the TV & Press. You can't finish as high in the Prem as Bolton did (and currently are) by just hoofing it to a big man. They are also still in the UEFA Cup. Ask Arsenal fans if they like watching all that pretty football with no end product, you can sometimes feel the Highbury fans willing the players to shooooooooot!
Big Sam is one of the best tacticians around and knows how to play to his strengths and attack the oppositions weaknesses - his success is there for all to see. Plus he's English which should be the way to go this time, surely? |
Agreed.

They drive me nuts when they do the 'over elaboration' routine. It's great to watch but sometimes........... On big Sam. I agree, a lot of the 'long ball' crap is 'Skytalk'. The media (and establishment) don't like smaller teams that have the temerity to challenge the 'big guns' and hence use any excuse to do them down. The football establishments public enemy no3, Wimbledon, took a lot of flak as 'long ball merchants', and still do from people who never even saw them. They had much more in the kitty than that, as do Bolton. However, I'm not sure Big Sam could cope with the FA (who can?). He's used to a tight, but sympathetic board, that let's him get on with it. He will NEVER get that with the FA. England managers, bar Venables and Ramsey, have too often picked teams that have the medias favourites, from their favourite clubs, rather than 'form players' in them.
O'neill is more pliable, but still gets his way in the end. He also, like Robson, took an unfashionable team and won things - consistently. He also stands no ***t from the players. Plus he can't stand the media. All positives in my book........
If we go for a foreigner Scolaris the best bet. However, neither he nor Hiddinck bowl me over.