 |
|
|
26-02-2009, 7:19 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 57
Thanks: Gave 1, Got 2
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Dont worry Bromley you will see a big difference. I have a 32 inch Sony with my HD box, the picture quality is great. Nature and sport are breathtaking on HD. The TV quality is more important than the HD box IMO.
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 7:34 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Qua Patet Orbis
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: Gave 196, Got 278
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
What rubbish about a 32" not giving a high def image 
I currently have HD attached to my 32" and the difference between HD movies and SD movies is night and day.
My HD picture is superb and the colours are simply amazing, you wait and see for yourself 
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 8:23 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 3,708
Thanks: Gave 768, Got 202
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by CloggyNL
What rubbish about a 32" not giving a high def image
I currently have HD attached to my 32" and the difference between HD movies and SD movies is night and day.
My HD picture is superb and the colours are simply amazing, you wait and see for yourself |
Response time (Motion)
__________________
Not all flatscreens have to be LCD!
Link removed for the final time
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 8:26 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 3,708
Thanks: Gave 768, Got 202
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by seasiderstu
Dont worry Bromley you will see a big difference. I have a 32 inch Sony with my HD box, the picture quality is great. Nature and sport are breathtaking on HD. The TV quality is more important than the HD box IMO.
|
Read under 'Static and Motion Resolution'
Will The 2007 HDTV You Choose Give You All Resolution You Expect? » HDGURU.Com
An LCD screens 'actual' resolved resolution because of motion blur suffers to the point that 50% of detail is lost when the screen shows movement...
__________________
Not all flatscreens have to be LCD!
Link removed for the final time
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 8:31 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,303
Thanks: Gave 40, Got 138
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Lcds are good for looking at your photos.
__________________
PIONEER PDP LX5090UT,PIONEER VSX LX60,PIONEER SV50 AV,SKY HD,XBOX 360 ELITE,PS3 60GB,PIONEER PDP 427XD,XBOX 360 60GB,.
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 8:40 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 3,708
Thanks: Gave 768, Got 202
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by PETE Heg
Lcds are good for looking at your photos. |
__________________
Not all flatscreens have to be LCD!
Link removed for the final time
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 10:15 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 471
Thanks: Gave 83, Got 8
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by BromleyWHU
Having read all the post on these forums.
Is it really worth me getting HD if I only Have a 32" LCD TV.
Will the HD really be noticably different to say if I had a 37 or a 42" TV?
Any views / comments  |
As you can see from my siggy i have both a 52" and 32" LCD both sony's and you want to know what HD is like on a 32"? Well i can tell you HD picture on my 32" Sony W4000 is STUNNING!!  
__________________
Sony 52w4000,Sony 32w4000,Sony s350 Blu-Ray,Sony Dz830w Home Theatre,Sky HD,Sony PS3 Slim,Xbox 360,Nintendo Wii,iPhone 3Gs 16gb(Black),Manchester United Official One United Member
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 10:21 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 59
Thanks: Gave 9, Got 6
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by philip birdi
As you can see from my siggy i have both a 52" and 32" LCD both sony's and you want to know what HD is like on a 32"? Well i can tell you HD picture on my 32" Sony W4000 is STUNNING!! |
I think that pretty much answers the OP's question.
|
|
|
|
|
26-02-2009, 11:52 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Prominent Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 3,708
Thanks: Gave 768, Got 202
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by crawffy
I think that pretty much answers the OP's question. |
__________________
Not all flatscreens have to be LCD!
Link removed for the final time
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 8:45 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 204
Thanks: Gave 9, Got 23
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Will you see a rise in quality on a 32" between SD and HD... Hell yes... You only have to flick between a programme being simulcast on an SD and HD channel to see... is it worth it yes.. I'm prepared to put my money where my mouth is.. I will pay the £49.99 cost of the HD box to the OP if he does not see an improvement. I will check  . Any of the size matters brigade care to match me...?
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 10:10 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 83
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 3
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
I have a Panasonic TX-32LZD85 and my HD picture is STUNNING.
Also, my SD picture probably looks better than those on larger screens.
__________________
House, car, motorbike, wife, TV, dog, and Sky HD!
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 11:06 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,293
Thanks: Gave 273, Got 521
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baldybouncer
LCDs yes are unable to produce fluid movement - so a 32" with a HD signal will not give a hidef picture when it has quick movement on it. This will look bad when sitting close to it...  |
While I'm no fan of the typical picture from an LCD, it's nonsense to suggest that HD material won't look better in this scenario.
And movement on my plasma reduces the effective resolution too, it's not unique to LCD. (although it is usually worse)
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 11:06 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 794
Thanks: Gave 53, Got 123
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
This is now getting like the old threads regarding the quality of HDMI leads, the more you spend the better it must be.
Defend your purchases as you wish, I don’t think anyone is saying the you cannot view HD on a 32” LCD and not notice any difference, more the proven fact that your viewing experience depends on size of screen V viewing distance. Also LCD screens are very poor at handling fast moving pictures, this too is a proven fact, and like already discussed, is more noticeable the bigger the screen.
Sky+ HD for me has made a big difference in the quality of my viewing pared with are 50” LG Plasma in the living room and 42” LG Plasma in the bedroom. Tried it on the 32” LCD in are daughters room and even she was happy to keep the Sky+ she already had in there, apposed Sky+ HD.
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 11:47 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 191
Thanks: Gave 30, Got 12
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by BromleyWHU
Having read all the post on these forums.
Is it really worth me getting HD if I only Have a 32" LCD TV.
Will the HD really be noticably different to say if I had a 37 or a 42" TV?
Any views / comments |
I have a Sony KDL32U3000, so a cheapie Supermarket Morrisons LCD tv at 32"
so is HD worth it and does it work?
Hell yeah, I have loads of HD DVDs and Xbox 360 that I play in 1080i, they look superb.
Sky+HD looks superb.
There is a difference! I won't go back to regular DVDs and low-res video gaming on my 32"
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2009, 11:50 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 471
Thanks: Gave 83, Got 8
|
Re: Anyone with HD & a 32" LCD
Quote:
Originally Posted by crawffy
I think that pretty much answers the OP's question. |
__________________
Sony 52w4000,Sony 32w4000,Sony s350 Blu-Ray,Sony Dz830w Home Theatre,Sky HD,Sony PS3 Slim,Xbox 360,Nintendo Wii,iPhone 3Gs 16gb(Black),Manchester United Official One United Member
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
