Cedia Usa 2006
| | Post Reply |
| | #1 |
| Distinguished Member | Cedia Usa 2006 Advertisement Want to Advertise?
Well since I’ve been back from CEDIA USA in Denver I’ve been very, very busy so not much time to put down my thoughts. So today I have some spare moments and I thought I might as well give you a British perspective on what was there. For the last three years CEDIA has been at Indianapolis but this year it was in Denver. I have to say, I prefer Denver. Although I preferred our accommodation in Indy….but that’s not why we went. We went to see all that is new and exciting in AV Land. No doubt some of you have followed the day to day reports on AVS forum, I know I did. I find it quite amazing how many folk can view the same thing yet have a completely different experience. Let me start by reminding everyone that I am the distributor for Lumagen in UK. What I will report is what I saw. I do not have daggers out for anyone and I hope folk can understand that I am honest in my comments of what I see. Read on. Denver convention centre is much like any other but they do have nice touches like the statues all over the place. This small one out front was pretty cool. ![]() The first port of call when we got our passes was to nip in to the portable HD-DVD show across the street. I won an HD-DVD…disc, not player though. They had one of the best images of show in there. They had a demo disc playing on a rear pro tv and it looked mental. I suspect this demo disc was made to the very, very highest standards as the KingKong trailer they showed has never ever looked so good to me. Possibly the more interesting thing for man of use was this though. ![]() Back over to the show and we had a wander. I can’t remember the exact routes so I’ll just comment on things I now remember. Pioneer: Stand had the 5000ex and the Elite version playing. Amazingly there were people beside me asking each other if they new when the 1080p panels would be out or shown…they obviously couldn’t see any benefit of the extra pixels on the one they were looking directly at…..or perhaps they couldn’t actually see the sign that said in big letters 1080P….which could explain a lot hahahaha…. Thought that they looked nice, as did the new 7th gen units. As is usually the case with these things they play very specific content to make sure you don’t see any possible issues with the panels. Which is fair enough. Good stand though. Panasonic had their 1080P 65” unit on show but no sign of a 50 that I could see. It is imminent though I believe. Panasonic were showing their own BluRay player as well. Now I am not sure if it was actually BluRay disc they were playing on the panels or if it was a BluRay advert fed of something else. The reason being this was the only BluRay demo that I thought looked good. Everywhere else I saw BluRay it looked really bad. Very noisy backgrounds making everything look nasty and processed. Here it looked good…very weird. Over at Fujitsu they had their 1080p panels. Yes, that’s right…remember how we were told that there is no point in 1080p panels at 50” or below..well have a look at this. ![]() Image quality was as you’d expect. Pretty nice. However, I have to say that whereas the current range are very sexy, these fall in to the Volvo design. What are they thinking…Here’s a closer look at the little one which I think is actually an lcd…Perhaps Graham can chime in and give us the scoop. ![]() Over at Sony I only really was interested in the SXRD rear pro’s. COOL. And the new little Pearl. We went three times to see this thing. Once each day. Day one. They were showing bluray. Looked poor. Noisy nasty image. Put on some video source HD and it looked much better but soft. Next day we went back and they were showing the same and some other video source material and it looked very sharp and good. Then last day we went in again and they were showing BluRay Narnia clip. It showed a very significant Uniformity issue. That is to say that the bottom right quadrant of the screen, when showing snow, was pink. This is a shading issue and I’m sure it’s very fixeable but I was surprised no-one else seemed to be commenting on it as it was not insignificant. So from three short 5 minute stints with Pearl I have to say that it looks like it could be great…looking forward to playing with one very very soon. While we’re on about Sony I should mention the HenryFu stand where they were doing G90 v Ruby. I’ve read the Art review of this and was surprised. When we went in they were playing out the last scene in Riddick. From what I saw for first 5 minutes I couldn’t see why anyone would buy a g90. In fact, I wondered why they were doing the demo. The Ruby had more detail and the contrast and punch was there a plenty. It looked nicer than the G90 physically. Then the credits came on and you could see the significantly darker blacks the G90 afforded. The demo was supposed to compare these two set up optimally so I asked why they weren’t using 48Hz to feed the Ruby. They got Roger Galvin to come and explain why. From what I remember of our conversation it went something like. Roger: “ 60Hz is optimal for that projector” Me: “No it’s not, it will run at 48Hz genlocked from 60Hz film. You can set the scaler to do that. You’ll get much smoother motion image” We then had a discussion about flicker and 50Hz and in the end it was obvious he was a CRT guy and had limited expereince of Ruby and Lumagens. So while it was entertaining it wasn’t exactly both devices set up for optimal playback. I’m sure that Roger is no fool and that he did a top job on the G90 but on that showing, even with the Ruby not optimised, I wouldn’t have picked a G90 myself. Before everyone starts on about how black is much blacker with CRT I know, I saw it. I’ve seen it. I’m just telling you my thoughts from what I saw in that single demo. MORE TO COME….. Last edited by Gordon @ Convergent AV; 23-09-2006 at 4:24 PM. |
| Quote |
| | #2 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
SIM2 stand was busy as always. Unfortunately Alan wasn’t there when I popped around. They had an off site demo though where they were showing the cheaper 1080p single chipper and the new big 3 chip unit. The chap over at that location played us some nice video footage on the big unit. It was BRIGHT. Easily lit up the very large screen they were using. Unsurprisingly it was quite loud. This is another one of the demo’s I saw where I am at odds with some of the other comments about what was seen. I can only presume that there were changes to set up of the device or some other environmental factors changed from what I saw and what others have said they saw. To me the big three chipper looked like it was a work in progress and just didn’t have the contrast punch you now expect, especially after seeing what the C3X and the HT3000 can achieve. Both excellent devices. Very friendly folk though. Optoma: The H81 was playing on a large screen in a closed off room. This was a great demo. I must say I did see rainbows and found it a little fatiguing but the picture was nice. Not sure why they’ve gone backwards in the sound output of it though. Louder than we have come to expect from H78/H79. I also stuck my head in to look at the other unit they are doing in US. Don’t think it’s coming to UK. Just as well, it wasn’t great. Runco: Showed their autoscope anamorphic lens tricked up 1080p unit. Very disappointed with this. One of my mates is the Spanish distributor for Runco and I think he wasn’t pleased when I told him it was pants. Just looked un-dynamic and noisy. Turns out that they’d had a problem with a unit just before we went in and they’d had to cobble together a replacement after knicking a loan unit from another manufacturer. So I’ll let them off as usually their demo’s are entertaining and set up well. JVC: We went off site to find the HD1K. Sure enough we got a nice tour of JVC’s room from a guy. Their broadcast monitor rear pro looked really very good to me. Ugly, but great image. Then we got shown in to look at HD10K and HD2K in a large venue screen. It was really very obvious how much better the HD10K was. Lovely image. JVC do three different scalers to work with their units. Obviously I’d recommend Lumagen hahaha but you can choose from rebadged VP30, Faroudja1080 or the Whitehorse OEM Silicon Optix HQV platform that many folk now rebadge. The latter is a scaler in a box designed and built by SO that manufacturers can just rebadge as their own. There were quite a few of them around the show….forgotten where I saw them now though! HD1K. Well this thing was a star for me. It was pretty obvious that it has a very very good contrast range. It was also pretty clear there was no dynamic iris involved. I was impressed. I have no idea how much this will be compared to a Ruby but I look forward to it coming out and having a play with a real production model and not a prototype. While we were over at this location we stuck our heads in to the Silicon Optix ballroom. As usual they had a MASSIVE screen being lit up by the QX1 Lcos unit, fed from Terranex Xantus processors. They also had 50 different curtained off areas showing their manufacturing partners products. ie Denon DVD player with Reon, Vantage scaler, Brillian displays etc etc. They also had some demo’s set up showing before and after processing. I have to say that there was only one single display or room in this hall that had what I would call a good image. That was the Cinetron booth. They had their LCOS based PJ there. Another room where I am in disagreement with some other visitors. This thing was punchy. Great dynamic image, no noise, very very sharp. To me it looked like they had chucked a fair chunk of money at the optics as it looked MUCH sharper than I’ve seen a Ruby for instance. When we saw it they said IRIS was open and lamp was on full power. It wasn’t the darkest room but I was happy with black levels even at that. Of course now I’ve come back I here that they turn all 50Hz material in to 60 internally so I guess I wont be getting involved with this model…..still, great demo from the new guys. Back to main hall. I’ve already written about some things in another thread so we’ll carry on with Algolith. These guys do Noise Reduction devices and an HQV scaler. I’ve seen the Flea demo before and liked what it does. However this time they had a mosquito doing all sorts of nr and the ends result was hideous. If you like posterised image with no detail at all and making folk look like they have put their make up on with a palette knife then step on up. For me I’d probably rather have watched the noisy image. I presume that there is the capacity to vary the severity of the nr but they seemed to have everything maxed I guess as it was BAD. Very disappointed with this and was looking foreward to seeing something special. Dropped by Vantage booth and they were doing pretty much the same thing as last year. Feed direct to plasma and another through scaler to plasma pixel mapped. I think it best I avoid comment on what I saw here. Digital Projection had an interesting room. They had a pile of their PJ’s firing at different sized screens all fed same material. The surprise for me here was the Titan 1080P 3 chip DLP. On paper it has much lower contrast range than the Projection Design OEM unit single chipper. However in this room the Titan’s looked significantly superior. They were very nice. Deep blacks, great colours, sharp image. Bloody expensive though. Nicely done wee demo, thumbs up. Arcam let the cat out of the bag by showing the new Movie Solo ![]() and as I said they had a new remote that’s going to go with all the new equipment. It’s a nice shape and it’s backlit with the light going through the text on buttons so you can actually read what they say! ![]() I’m sure there is more I’ll remember but before I post the images of shame I will just say that there was beer involved on this trip. Nice beer. ![]() |
| Quote |
| | #3 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
On to the images of shame. On a thread over at AVS that asked what do you expect to see at CEDIA I replied lots of badly set up displays in the wrong aspect ratio. So, here you go.....this is just a selection. I've cropped out who they were to spare embaressment. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() guess there is always next year... |
| Quote |
| Thanks from: | choddo2006 (23-09-2006), kurtz (23-09-2006), Nic Rhodes (23-09-2006), Russell.Williams (24-09-2006), Welwynnick (23-09-2006) |
| | #4 |
| Prominent Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Gordon, great report,very interesting reading. The pic of the Xbox360, is there any info to go with this pic ??
|
| Quote |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Gordon. The latest news on the Cinetron is that it does do a 50Hz display rate for a 50Hz input. SWChen confirmed this after talking to one of his engineers (his previous comments were wrong) . They are looking to see if they can get a native 48Hz prior to production, which should definitely be possible technically as it uses the Realta chip.
|
| Quote |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Cheers Gordon some interesting stuff... Adrian I suspect the Fujitsu 1080p panels, when released in the new year will be pretty high... Dilemma is do I buy the 58 panel or wait.. Adrian |
| Quote |
| | #7 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
I have Mr Chens contact details and they have mine so I may have a chat. Good luck to them on doing 48Hz with HQV...they'll be the first to manage it if they do..... HD-DVD module for XBOX 360. Well it was in an enclosed case attached to the console that was being played. The back of the case wasn't clear perpsex so I couldn't take a pic. Just thought that it looked kind of cool and wasn't sure if anyone had seen one in the flesh yet. Isn't it supposed to launch day and date that Sony do PS3? |
| Quote |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Gordon, do you mean 60i ITC -> 48Hz (or even 60p ITC -> 48Hz)? The news we have on the Mits HC5000 is that it will do an internal display rate of 48Hz for a 24p or 48p input. And it uses HQV (Reon). See this post: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&&#post8353901 and this one: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&&#post8354461 Last edited by VirusKiller; 23-09-2006 at 4:34 PM. |
| Quote |
| | #9 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Yes I mean 60Hz film source in and 24/48/72 genlocked frame rate out. That is not the same as passing on an incoming 48Hz frame rate or frame doubling 24Hz. If they can get 48Hz input signal rate working then super! Everyone buy a Lumagen and away we go.....Now I think about it they should be able to get 48Hz in working I'd hope. Gordon |
| Quote |
| | #10 | ||
| Senior Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006 Quote:
Quote:
![]() Edit: Your comments would suggest that not even Lumagen has managed to genlock 24/48/72 from 60i/p. Hence Radiance XG? Or were you referring to PJs. (BTW, I know you are under NDA...).
Last edited by VirusKiller; 23-09-2006 at 4:39 PM. | ||
| Quote |
| | #11 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Lumagen have genlocked 48/72 out for interlaced 60Hz film sources of SD for about 18months and probably 6 months for 1080i HD. This is in their current Vision range. There will be an iteration of the firmware that will do 24Hz out as well I hope. I cannot comment on what is happening with Radiance range in development. All I said was that no-one has got a product out there with an HQV chip that can remove 2:3 sequence on an interlaced 60Hz source. I'm sure someone will eventually..... ![]() Gordon |
| Quote |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Interesting, if slightly damning of the HQV solution and/or OEM implementations...
|
| Quote |
| | #13 |
| Conspicuous Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Hi Gordon, Thanks for the report. According to Darinp2 over on avs, to try and equalise the Rubys' light output to the G90, they reduced the contrast down quite a bit. They also allowed some black crush on both so the G90 could do total fade to black. So although they may have tried to make the test appear fair, either deliberatly or otherwise they crippled the Ruby. I think most would have used an ND filter to dim the Ruby and then position it so the lumens were pretty close, but by reducing the contrast they also reduced the max CR the Ruby can achieve. Gary. |
| Quote |
| | #14 |
| Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Thanks for the informative write up Gordon. We get to meet soon as you are coming to calibrate my Ruby. I am the bloke getting the HDQ through you through Joe up in Edinburgh. |
| Quote |
| | #15 | |
| Veteran Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006 Quote:
I'm curious about your comments on the SXRDs. If you could take front vs rear projection out of the equation for a moment, how would you compare the PQ of the RPTVs with the Ruby? Cheers, Nick | |
| Quote |
| | #16 |
| Distinguished Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Not sure you can do that Nick. If I could have image quality of a rear pro tv without the ugly big box I'd be happy though. You've reminded me about something else we saw. There was a rear pro DLP that was lit from LED array. I think it might have been on Toshiba or Samsung stand. It looked great to me. Much better than the lamped rear pro's beside it. Could have been a set up of course....in fact most things at these shows are probably set ups... Gordon |
| Quote |
| | #17 |
| Conspicuous Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Hi Gordon, I think those LED rear pro's use a DMD and no colour wheel, and apparently it greatly reduces the rainbow effect (eliminates it?) since the LEDs are meant to be able to switch a lot quicker than a colour wheel can rotate. Gary |
| Quote |
| | #18 |
| Veteran Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
I've never really been able to reconcile front vs rear projection. It always seems to come down to horses for courses. The LED RPTVs are something I've an eye out for (though not over here just yet, unfortunately). LEDs have a very narrow band emission, so colours can be very accurate. Colour wheels and the like only filter broadband light, so if you want really accurate colours (instead of a mixture) then you have to filter out MOST of what the lamp generates. With LEDs you get to use all the light. Plus the switching is fast. Plus you can illuminate the DMD in any order of colours. Plus you don't have to use every colour every cycle. Once the shackles of the colour wheel are off....... But the really big thing (for me, that I always go on about on this subject) is that you don't even have to turn the light source on. Think about it. For centuries (well, you know what I mean) the choice was tube or bulb, blacks or greys, and only CRTs could ever do blacks because they were the only things that could actually turn off. Well, LEDs turn on and off maybe 36 times every frame. I've been speculating that if some of those on cycles were skipped you could get really good blacks. Of course that only helps on/off contrast, but even CRTs don't show DLPs how to do ANSI contrast, do they? This is all speculative, because the Samsung HL-S5679 and HP MD5280(?) actually have lower contrast than their bulb relatives. Hopefully someone in TI will see the light (or dark) and realise what a great opportunity they are sitting on. You know where you heard it first. Good to hear that you think the 5679 looked good, though, Gordon. Did you think it was better than the SXRDs? Cheers, Nick |
| Quote |
| | #19 |
| Prominent Member | Re: Cedia Usa 2006
Come to the What HIFI show in London next week and see the AVIAMO range for yourself (hopefully). Until now there has been little point in building a 1920 x 1080 res screen, as content is not availble and processing needed to be significantly improved to be worthy of the Fujitsu name for PQ when feeding a screen of this resolution with anything lower than 1080p material (which we STILL wait for). Market demand for these screens (the whole 1080p rollercoaster) ensured that they were built. The 37" screen is indeed an LCD (a fujitsu first) as the new processing chip design has finally meant it is worth building a sub 42" screen of quality. The 65" is also likely to make production soon as 1920 x 1080 makes sense at this size, the 50" as I said before may come along later next year depending on if a source can do it justice. Come and see for yourselves, I would like to hear everyone's views on this concept range.
|
| Quote |
| Post Reply |
Thread information and display options














Or were you referring to PJs. (BTW, I know you are under NDA...).







E. & O.E.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks