| Re: Bye Bye Standby Review
nothing wrong with learning to conserve limited resources.
Limited resources has nothing to do with GW
the cutting of the extra emissions is just a bonus since it is pollution and is harmful to the environment.
Example mercury, radiation, nitrous oxide, etc. All these things are bad for us. I know mercury is not a green house gas but it causes severe illness. Once it is in the body there is no getting it out....
The real question becomes does it take more resources and energy to produce those switches than the energy saved by preventing standby...
This is where you take in the "Total Cost" every thing involved along the whole process and its entire life use.
example where the "total cost" exceeds the benefit is if the unit had a very short life, breaks down every few months and needs to be thrown away and is unrecyclable the resources consumed to use the switch would exceed the energy saved that standby uses. Thus it would be more wasteful.
I would be curious as to know how much resources and energy that went into making them and the actual life of the units. Vs the energy from standby that a particular item uses. Do a comparison.
If it was made in china I am pretty sure it has an ultra short life-cycle. almost everything electronic or motorized from there has broke for me within 6 months or less.
Give you an Idea I spent about 500$ for 50$ or less on electronic or motorized items made in china all but 2 have broke and were not recyclable as a result I am extra careful to look at the label where it was made. All of the resources that went into making those items were wasted, Extremely unsustainable.
I hope for the best with this particular item , that it is worthwhile
|