Give you an Idea of cost of a led bulb to re place a 60 watt equivelent ranges about 46$ per bulb a CFL is 6$ max here. I am not sure of the conversion to your UK conversion.
general use lights above are to be used as you would CFL thus why the price I been only able to locate one company that makes this type so far.
There are plenty of "spot light" LEDs which run around 7$ or so. These lights for lighting large areas are inefficient for you need many of them. which adds up.
Sould always check your link when posting anyway to be sure they work properly.
spam may have been unitentional then. I never actually acused LOZ of being a represenetive of said company. Where in the following
"Blue" line did I say loz was a represenetive or salesman? I was saying he was advertising something the site did not carry. It does not matter that I did or did not know how Libi runs there business. If anything, Loz should have given a valid time frame as to how long the sale might last and when he heard about it to give other people here an idea how long it is valid, so that we would know when the link was still valid or not.
"
If they pulled it from there shelves then the link would be spam since your advertising something that they do not carry"
There was nothing harsh about it.
here are some others definition of spam the first link note section regarding spam
http://nawcc-mb.com/rules.htm#4 http://compnetworking.about.com/libr...bldef-spam.htm http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=553744
I like this one
http://beta.net4.in/net4app/aspx/gen...pamPolicy.aspx
for it is hitting on the head as to why i used the "

" I was refering to what was written and the link itself. Not dirrectly at Loz.
It has to do with being advertising related to led bulbs loosly related to the forum.
This discusion could have been avoided if it had been added to the LED Thread that is reletivily recent topic. that way the information was related to the topic at hand.
http://beta.net4.in/net4app/aspx/gen...pamPolicy.aspx
Keep in mind that I never accused Loz. I was pointing out that the nature of how it was writen was exactly how spam is written
Now that this has gone into the discusion mode and Loz has clarified it goes to show that it is not spam I was basing the origional post based on how it was writen. I do not participate in the electronic portions
So I do not know loz contributions elswhere on this site
I am in no way moderating I was giving suggestions as to how it could have been writen so as not to appear as spam