 | | |
28-01-2005, 9:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Aldershot, Hants
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: Gave 193, Got 847 | HS50 and 50hz, I'm now a believer....
I've just finished a session with Ian (Scotty Boy) and John (Drummerjohn) which was organised to test the 50hz settings on the HS50. As someone who is completely naive with Powerstrip, Ian and John came over to test the projector to see if 50hz could be achieved.
I have to state up front that I did not believe it would make any difference (assuming it worked), as I quite happily watched PAL discs at 60hz without ever noticing stuttering. The most recent PAL disc I have been using for setting colours etc, is LOTR ROTK, extended edition. Before Ian and John arrived, I watched the slow pan up Doom Mountain (chapter 34) several times without seeing any stuttering at all, even though I was looking hard for it.
John bought Fight Club and Monsters Inc as there are a couple of scenes that showed the stuttering well, I could see this clearly, although if it hadn't been pointed out, I would have lived in ignorant bliss for a while longer
To cut a long story short, the Sony accepted the 50hz setting using Powerstrip, and further it gave perfect 1:1 pixel mapping. The 50hz setting does not appear to change either the brightness of the picture, or the colours.
We now played my Doom Mountain scene at 50hz, and it still looked really smooth. Change back to 60hz, run the scene again. Now theres stutter in the pan. Where the hell did that come from? And thats the crux, it looked smooth at 60hz, until you see it at 50hz, when it really is a smooth pan. We also played the Fight Club and Monsters Inc scenes again, and they were now totally smooth as well.
So I'm converted.
Reclock was also loaded as this is most likely needed on most setups to prevent any stutters from the codecs.
I hope this also confirms to anyone who wanted the question answered, the Sony accepts 50hz for your PAL discs, with perfect pixel mapping.
Thanks to Ian and John for coming over and playing with the settings, its much appreciated. I feel another 2 HS50 owners are on the horizon
Last edited by UrbanT; 28-01-2005 at 9:59 PM.
|
| |
28-01-2005, 10:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Horley, Surrey
Posts: 1,075
Thanks: Gave 3, Got 21 |
This stuttering you mention......
Set my mind thinking.
I run a Pannie AE200 from my PC via powerstrip 1:1 pixel matching.
I always notice on BIG pans in films, things are not VERY smooth.
Nothing your would really notice unless looking for it, but often something big moves by and you can see there are steps in the movement.
Would this be the kind of thing you are talking about, or is this soemthing totally different?
I just always assumed it was something to do with the fact that film is not shot at a very high frames/sec.
__________________
Time Flies like the Wind, but Fruit Flies like a Banana!
|
| |
28-01-2005, 10:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,743
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 31 |
I've never been sure if Reclock is needed for 50hz PAL, though I too include it because everyone else does.  Tonight I was doing some fiddling with FFDSHOW and tried removing Reclock when playing PAL and didn't notice any difference, so now I'm wondering if what I read about Reclock only being useful for NTSC (to get that weird fractional refresh rate) is really the case.
My favourite test for judder is chapter 2 of FOTR which starts with that close-up pan of the map followed by the slower pull-back .. really ugly at 60Hz.
__________________
Robin ... but I answer to many names |
| |
28-01-2005, 11:07 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Southampton
Posts: 1,497
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 78 |
Recolcks requirement varies from setup to setup.
I could watch a PAL movie @ 50hz on my system for almost 20 minutes before stutter kicked in without reclock. On UrbanTs it was probably 2 mins.
With reclock it vanished for ever on my system.
|
| |
29-01-2005, 8:33 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Aldershot, Hants
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: Gave 193, Got 847 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tempest
I always notice on BIG pans in films, things are not VERY smooth.
Nothing your would really notice unless looking for it, but often something big moves by and you can see there are steps in the movement.
Would this be the kind of thing you are talking about, or is this soemthing totally different?
. | Thats exactly how I would describe it. The scene from Monster Inc has a slow pan across a room, with a lamp on a table. The scene looks smooth except for the lamp, where you can see the steps in the movement.
|
| |
29-01-2005, 11:19 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,258
Thanks: Gave 17, Got 61 |
Anybody who says they have perfectly smooth pans for PAL at 60Hz refresh rate is...mistaken.
I believe that the need for Reclock is system dependent, different combination of sound card/graphics card/drivers etc can result in the need for reclock. Without reclock on my system I get a stutter on PAL @50hz every twenty or so seconds as if the sound card and graphics card are going out of sync and the stutter is caused by one trying to catch up with the other. I do not, however, get the microstutter that this thread is refering to. At 60hz I get microstutter but not the stutter every 20 seconds.
The stutter caused at 60Hz on NTSC by 3:2 pulldown also drives me crazy, that's why I stopped buying R1 DVDs about six months ago.
__________________ VW60 Black Pearl , Panasonic 37PX80B; Onkyo TX-SR605 AV Receiver; Monitor Audio B2s (fronts & surrounds); Monitor Audio ASW100; Monitor Audio Bronze Centre; Blu-Ray HCPC; I miss the taste of meat |
| |
29-01-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,743
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 31 |
Using Reclock last night I became a tad annoyed at the repeated frames, Reclock's count was over 450 after watching part 2 of FOTR:EE .. I may try twiddling with Powerstrip to try to get the 9600's timing a bit tighter to eliminate the need for it. I suppose another option is to try 75Hz and see if the timing is any better without twiddling.
Does PAL want an exact multiple of 25 or is it like NTSC which needs a shade under 60 (59.94 or something isn't it?).
__________________
Robin ... but I answer to many names |
| |
29-01-2005, 12:33 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Southampton
Posts: 1,497
Thanks: Gave 8, Got 78 |
Kragorn - 450 repeated frames? Something very wrong there. What does reclock say about how it adapted?
PAL wants multiple of 25. I find that to make reclocks life easier I have to adjust the latencies of the video card and sound card.
|
| |
29-01-2005, 12:42 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Prominent Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,743
Thanks: Gave 2, Got 31 |
I only glanced at the numbers and only the repeat count registered with me. I do recall it had settled the refresh at 49.939.
I'm using on-bard S/PDIF as I've never found a need to question it, should I be now? I once fiddled with the latency of the AGP when I had the 6800GT, not tried since putting back the ATI .. when I did play I never could perceive any difference I have to say.
However, this discussion I've started is going OT and really belongs in the HTPC forum. I'll do some more playing and if I stil get what you indicate are bad results I'll post them there.
Cheers.
__________________
Robin ... but I answer to many names |
| |
29-01-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
UrbanT, I've spent the last week or so trying to mirror your software set up to get nice playback on 60hz  When I fed a 50hz signal to my HS50 the picture became smaller and I thought I had a cropping issue (reference has been made somewhere to 50hz in input A having the problem as HDMI input) - I use powerstrip - can you post your settings page? Did you simply use the standard 50hz resloution show here:
PS I'm just about managing a 2x resize in FFDSHOW on my XP 2600+ now that I've changed to the latest Sonic DVD codec (bought this morning) from the nvidia codec. I've got a Radeon 9700 Pro and this is presumably why the nvidia codec took 10% more CPU usage.
__________________ Set up: Sony VPL-HS50 connected to HTPC via VGA |
| |
29-01-2005, 1:21 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Aldershot, Hants
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: Gave 193, Got 847 |
Craig, when we first put the 50hz setting into the Sony, it also showed the blanking issues. However, you need to go into the Sony's menu, and change Input A from 'auto' to 'computer', and that solved the problem. Its nothing to do with Powerstrip settings.
I use the ATI 9800 pro with the Nvidia codecs of Theatertek, and prefer them to the old Sonic decoders, but thats just my preference
Even though I have the CPU power to to resize 2.5x, I only resize to 1280 x 720, with Lanczos 2. I couldn't see any improvement by going higher, and I played for hours to see if it made a difference. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Craig Armstrong UrbanT, I've spent the last week or so trying to mirror your software set up to get nice playback on 60hz  When I fed a 50hz signal to my HS50 the picture became smaller and I thought I had a cropping issue (reference has been made somewhere to 50hz in input A having the problem as HDMI input) - I use powerstrip - can you post your settings page? Did you simply use the standard 50hz resloution show here:
PS I'm just about managing a 2x resize in FFDSHOW on my XP 2600+ now that I've changed to the latest Sonic DVD codec (bought this morning) from the nvidia codec. I've got a Radeon 9700 Pro and this is presumably why the nvidia codec took 10% more CPU usage. | |
| |
29-01-2005, 2:06 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
Ah! Thanks UrbanT, made that change. However, the 720p custom resolution I selected from the menu puts the picture on the far left - it seems that if I change the front and back porch figures that I get the picture centred, although the image doesn't fill my widescreen pj screen properly, the picture is too narrow in essence. Could you post your front and back porch figures etc on the Advanced timings page? Thanks for your help. Here are mine for reference: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=si&img=203217
__________________ Set up: Sony VPL-HS50 connected to HTPC via VGA |
| |
29-01-2005, 2:30 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
Hmmm, and now its reading the signal at a computer input, my zoomplayer playback doesn't take up the whole projector screen, even if full screen mode. Hmmm, what devilish setting do I need to change?...
EDIT: Am I supposed to use the zoom function using my mouse wheel?
__________________ Set up: Sony VPL-HS50 connected to HTPC via VGA
Last edited by Craig Armstrong; 29-01-2005 at 3:02 PM.
|
| |
29-01-2005, 2:35 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Aldershot, Hants
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: Gave 193, Got 847 |
Here sare the settings I have: 37.400
1280
72
128
1664 50.000
720
3
5
20
748
Pixel clock 62.234
As far as I remember, these are just the settings that appeared after typing in 50.000 on that page.
|
| |
29-01-2005, 3:44 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: Gave 0, Got 0 |
I think there's a figure missing from the above  but as soon as I start changing one figure, the other change!  I've selected 720p for LCD screens from powerstrip list and then knocked refresh from 60hz down to 50hz. It looked fine expect I notice that there is a final line of green pixels down the right hand edge of the image. Obviously one of my figures isn't right.
EDIT: A ha! Got it
the missing number is 184 below 128
So our settings are:
37.400
1280
72
128
184
1664
50.000
720
3
5
20
748
Pixel clock 62.234
__________________ Set up: Sony VPL-HS50 connected to HTPC via VGA
Last edited by Craig Armstrong; 18-06-2005 at 4:11 PM.
|
| | | |