Member Log In

Not a Member Yet?

It only takes a minute to start enjoying the benefits of AVForums membership, and it's free!

The US hate campaign against BP - I don't get it.

Post Reply
Old 04-06-2010, 3:51 PM   #61
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
All these anti-American semetics are awesome!!!

Last edited by Det; 04-06-2010 at 3:59 PM.
  Quote
Advert
Log in or sign up to remove
Old 04-06-2010, 3:56 PM   #62
Illustrious Member
Sonic67's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Home
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: Gave 1,826, Got 2,381
Posts: 19,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJTX100 View Post
Worst-case the UK Government may lose £6bill in taxes over this if BPs annual profit is wiped. That's not gonna help our deficit.
Maybe lots of oil revenue from exploiting the Falklands will help pay off losing money near Florida?
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 4:03 PM   #63
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
Thanks: Gave 190, Got 251
Posts: 3,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fowl View Post
Maybe because they don't want to give up the Reserve?

Doesn't capping essentially prevent an easy restart to pumping work?
To all intents and purposes the solution they're trying right now effectively replaces the 'lost' riser pipe and lets them collect the oil into tankers?

Regardless they are planning to plug the well as the long term solution...
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 4:49 PM   #64
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Thanks: Gave 97, Got 39
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post
All these anti-American semetics are awesome!!!
Hi Detrimental2u
Can you explain what semetics mean ?
I have looked it up on google and all it goes on about is something about folk who live in ancient AFRICA.
Your comment about anti-American could not be further from the truth,regarding any comment i have made.
I honestly think the USA does a great job as the worlds police man .The country as a whole is a great advert for multi cultralism ,The people are American first and foremost. The UK could learn a lot from this way of thinking.
But i stand by my point American engineers and American engineering are behind this accident.
If there was a tragic Accident at a Steel works in the UK,Would we all start jumping on the band wagon and blaming India ?
If there was a accident at a brewery in Burton on Trent or Tadcaster, Would we blame the Belgians ?
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 6:06 PM   #65
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by danalfie View Post
Hi Detrimental2u
Can you explain what semetics mean ?
I have looked it up on google and all it goes on about is something about folk who live in ancient AFRICA.
Your comment about anti-American could not be further from the truth,regarding any comment i have made.
I honestly think the USA does a great job as the worlds police man .The country as a whole is a great advert for multi cultralism ,The people are American first and foremost. The UK could learn a lot from this way of thinking.
But i stand by my point American engineers and American engineering are behind this accident.
If there was a tragic Accident at a Steel works in the UK,Would we all start jumping on the band wagon and blaming India ?
If there was a accident at a brewery in Burton on Trent or Tadcaster, Would we blame the Belgians ?
Its more closely related to Jews than Africans but I was using it as analygous to some of the posts on here and Jew hating in WWII... granted it's not that bad, but still... I think it's unwarranted.

But honestly, I don't think we're blaming the UK... maybe the company is British, but so what, if an American company did it, we'd be blaming them too. And one thing you have to keep in mind, the owner of the contract or supplies are the ones to be held responsible.

Yes an American company may have built it, but it's up to the owners of the company (BP) to maintain it and operate it within regulations... which they have a history of circumventing safety issues in the past so I think it's pretty safe to blame BP for it. Not UK as a whole, just the company.

Last edited by Det; 04-06-2010 at 6:10 PM.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 6:28 PM   #66
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Thanks: Gave 34, Got 356
Posts: 922
Good post from Vnb.

It was interesting to hear on the Radio 4 Nature programme their man who toured the coastal area reported that while some wildlife had been affected it was only a small fraction of the damage that had been predicted.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 6:44 PM   #67
Prominent Member
Wild Weasel's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Medieval Warm Period
Thanks: Gave 264, Got 509
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post
Yes an American company may have built it, but it's up to the owners of the company (BP) to maintain it and operate it within regulations... which they have a history of circumventing safety issues in the past so I think it's pretty safe to blame BP for it. Not UK as a whole, just the company.
BP didn't own the Deepwater Horizon rig. It was built by Hyundai in South Korea and leased to BP by its owner, Transocean Ltd.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 7:27 PM   #68
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Weasel View Post
BP didn't own the Deepwater Horizon rig. It was built by Hyundai in South Korea and leased to BP by its owner, Transocean Ltd.
Someone said Cameron (american company) built it earlier in this thread. *shrug*

I don't care either way, I just want the damn thing fixed.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 7:36 PM   #69
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Thanks: Gave 97, Got 39
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post
Its more closely related to Jews than Africans but I was using it as analygous to some of the posts on here and Jew hating in WWII... granted it's not that bad, but still... I think it's unwarranted.

But honestly, I don't think we're blaming the UK... maybe the company is British, but so what, if an American company did it, we'd be blaming them too. And one thing you have to keep in mind, the owner of the contract or supplies are the ones to be held responsible.

Yes an American company may have built it, but it's up to the owners of the company (BP) to maintain it and operate it within regulations... which they have a history of circumventing safety issues in the past so I think it's pretty safe to blame BP for it. Not UK as a whole, just the company.
Dont think you will find any anti American sentiments on this thread, I will stand corrected if you can find any .
Analygous have not got a clue what that means ?
I take your valid point about if it was one of your companies you would think the same,But i doubt you would be jumping up and down on the stars and stripes like some of your countrymen did to ours ?
And to finish i will put down your referance to Jews as genuine ignorance of how Europeans would find this so offensive.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 7:47 PM   #70
Veteran Member
brumhee's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ipswich
Thanks: Gave 684, Got 901
Posts: 5,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prasius View Post
According to my mate (tm) There was something on Radio 5 the other day about the scale of this in comparison to other oil disasters and it's only rating at Number 40 on the list or something. I'll do some proper digging on that later. I'm not suggesting it's just a little incident, but it's suggested it's a long way from the worlds greatest ever oil slick.

And I'm not really suggesting you're all bad Detrimental - it's just the ranting at BP seemed a little silly to me; it's not like it was intentional!
The biggest was the Iraqis before the first gulf war (I think it was the first). They scuttled a load of tankers to slow the american fleet!
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 8:02 PM   #71
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by danalfie View Post
Dont think you will find any anti American sentiments on this thread, I will stand corrected if you can find any .
Analygous have not got a clue what that means ?
I take your valid point about if it was one of your companies you would think the same,But i doubt you would be jumping up and down on the stars and stripes like some of your countrymen did to ours ?
And to finish i will put down your referance to Jews as genuine ignorance of how Europeans would find this so offensive.
Meant Analogous, as in analogy.

It's possible I am reading too far into people's posts. But you're right, I wouldn't be jumping up and down on your flag, but to be honest, there are idiots in every country that do stupid things everyday. That just happened to be caught on camera.

Semetism happens everyday, I'm not specifically referring to Holocaust if that's what you're assuming. But you're probably right when you said "Sentiments" as it is clearly the more appropriate word.
  Quote
Thanks from:
danalfie (04-06-2010)
Old 04-06-2010, 8:04 PM   #72
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Thanks: Gave 77, Got 113
Posts: 569
Thanks added to all the posts that have made me laugh

Detrimental - come on, lets not see you fall into that seemingly unique American phenomena of hearing any criticism of the US, or anything associated with the US, and thinking the criticiser is one step away from strapping on a suicide vest and screaming ALLAH AKBAR! whilst running at the local US Embassy... Oh, and just to refute any comparison to European Jews in WW2, neither is anyone suggesting we show the American populace some questionable shower blocks just because they're currently occupied ranting about BP.

Just to repeat the original point I was trying to make is that the American media and leadership seem to be spending all their time crying and ranting about what has happened, and haven't spent any time at all asking why, from a national policy point of view, such a process, with all its inherent risks was allowed to proceed in the first place.

Last edited by Prasius; 04-06-2010 at 8:07 PM.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 8:36 PM   #73
Veteran Member
Bill Hicks's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, England.
Thanks: Gave 1,175, Got 937
Posts: 5,841
Detrimental2U.
Over here we drink Carling, not that gassy amber fizz water you guys produce!
So stop calling my pint a woman!
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 8:52 PM   #74
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
I can take criticism. Others might not be able to. However, I think the criticism should be appropriate to the individual rather than the nation. Just like with every nation there is good and bad within a society.

*** is Carling? I drink Shiner Bock. Shiner Bock > Your women/beer
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 9:07 PM   #75
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Thanks: Gave 97, Got 39
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post
they have a history of circumventing safety issues in the past so I think it's pretty safe to blame BP for it. Not UK as a whole, just the company.
Yes BP have had problems in the USA before.
The main cause of loss of life at Texas city was shutdown cabins on the plant during start up.
I work on a Chemical/Refinary complex here in the UK,This scenario would just not happen here. The workforce would not accept it.
Up until Texas city it must of been common practice in the US otherwise why were they there?
All that is happening is your engineering teams etc are cutting corners and BP the owners are picking up the can.
We are all frustrated and want this sorted and i am sure good American and British workers are working together to get there.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 9:22 PM   #76
Veteran Member
Bill Hicks's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, England.
Thanks: Gave 1,175, Got 937
Posts: 5,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post

*** is Carling? I drink Shiner Bock. Shiner Bock > Your women/beer
I'll buy you a pint any day.
Just as long as it's Sam Addams.
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 9:38 PM   #77
Conspicuous Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Thanks: Gave 772, Got 1,549
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detrimental2u View Post
I can take criticism. Others might not be able to. However, I think the criticism should be appropriate to the individual rather than the nation. Just like with every nation there is good and bad within a society.
Well said and I quite agree.

However, the American media, newspapers and TV, grab every opportunity to voice indignation and criticism on anything BP, or it's senior representatives, say or do. As such, to outsiders, the American media represent the feelings of the nation. That also includes the President as he has chosen to jump on the bandwagon.

Such righteous indignation caught me by surprise as it was not expected. Everywhere else in the world where such oil spills have taken place its been a case of roll the sleeves up and all hands to the pumps and everyone helps out.

These days it would appear in America that litigation has priority over all else. Stand back and squeeze as much money out of the situation as possible. Fill ya boots boys.

I now view America in a new light.
  Quote
Thanks from:
Fen Star (10-06-2010)
Old 04-06-2010, 10:42 PM   #78
Senior Moderator
Steven's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Blog Entries: 45
Thanks: Gave 2,339, Got 5,123
Posts: 34,711
Just watching HIGNFY on iPlayer...

BP Global | BP
Quote:
Do you have ideas to help us?:
+1 281 366 5511
  Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 10:44 PM   #79
Veteran Member
Bill Hicks's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, England.
Thanks: Gave 1,175, Got 937
Posts: 5,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan CD View Post
Well said and I quite agree.

However, the American media, newspapers and TV, grab every opportunity to voice indignation and criticism on anything BP, or it's senior representatives, say or do. As such, to outsiders, the American media represent the feelings of the nation. That also includes the President as he has chosen to jump on the bandwagon.

Such righteous indignation caught me by surprise as it was not expected. Everywhere else in the world where such oil spills have taken place its been a case of roll the sleeves up and all hands to the pumps and everyone helps out.

These days it would appear in America that litigation has priority over all else. Stand back and squeeze as much money out of the situation as possible. Fill ya boots boys.

I now view America in a new light.
Well said but nothings changed there really!
The US has always been a litigation society.

Last edited by Bill Hicks; 04-06-2010 at 10:48 PM.
  Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 6:04 PM   #80
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Thanks: Gave 34, Got 356
Posts: 922
A post from a US citizen, lifted from elsewhere:-


By the end of this month there will at least 50 deep water offshore drilling rigs idle due to the total offshore drilling ban by President Obama.

When taking into account of all the service/supply companies that livelihood depends on offshore drilling, it will cause at a minimum job loss of 100,000 people. The longer the ban is in place, the higher the number of people becoming unemployed.

These soon to be unemployed people will stop buying new cars, used cars, eating out, not buy a new or used home, new clothes, etcetera. So just guess how many other people will lose their jobs.

One accident on an offshore drilling rig in over forty (40) years and Obama risks sending the US economy into a deep recession just to be Politically Correct.
  Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 7:50 PM   #81
Senior Moderator
Steven's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Blog Entries: 45
Thanks: Gave 2,339, Got 5,123
Posts: 34,711
Awfully PC when marine life choke to death and tourists stay away from the oil soaked beaches. There are more people affected than just the oil industry

It is important to exercise caution when reading an American forum - One amusing opinion I read advocating the resumption of drilling was that oil derived from nature and thus being a natural product it was good for the ocean as it merely represented the natural cycle
  Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 9:17 PM   #82
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Thanks: Gave 34, Got 356
Posts: 922
I think you're missing the point - it will do nothing to assist or rectify the current situation - just makes matters worse.

Also, see my #66. A fairly impartial report, I would say, without trying to minimise it in any way.
  Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 7:38 AM   #83
Prominent Member
xit2050's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Thanks: Gave 239, Got 443
Posts: 4,334
How much is leaking according to BP?

First announcements: 1,000 barrels a day
Two weeks later: 5,000 barrels
Early last week: 12,000 barrels
End of last week: 19,000 barrels
Latest press briefing: 25,000 barrels

What a BP board member told the senate's commission behind closed doors: 60,000 barrels (9.5 million litres) each day.

And then there is this: New oil plume evidence uncovered - CNN.com
  Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 8:39 AM   #84
Senior Member
SyStemDeMoN's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Upstream Without a Paddle
Thanks: Gave 400, Got 291
Posts: 2,915
The effect on Wildlife is my main concern here.

Why is it, that if this had happened somewhere else, then the US would have probably pledged to help in the clear up and fix the problem ?

BP haven't said "prove it was us then we will help" pr anything like that, they just shut up and got on with dealing with the disaster, as any blame can be sorted later but the loss of marine life and damage to coast line cannot.

I can't belive the US would do nothing, why not help get the situation sorted, then bill BP ??

On another note, why don't BP just ask Micheal Bay to fix it, Blockbuster style !

YouTube - South Park - Michael Bay
  Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 5:23 PM   #85
Prominent Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
Thanks: Gave 190, Got 251
Posts: 3,360
So the cap seems to be working well. Looking at BPs website they collected 14,800 barrels and flared 30.6 million cubic feet of gas.

The first one is good, but the second one seems like something of a waste, surely there must be a way to capture that gas and use it?
  Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 5:46 PM   #86
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Thanks: Gave 97, Got 39
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
So the cap seems to be working well. Looking at BPs website they collected 14,800 barrels and flared 30.6 million cubic feet of gas.

The first one is good, but the second one seems like something of a waste, surely there must be a way to capture that gas and use it?
Hi Baldrick
Some good news at last hope it continues.
Dont know how they could collect it.
Gas is normaly transported in a liquified state,Perhaps some of the new ships with a liquifacation plant built on board could be used ?
I suspect at this moment in time everybody will be working on capping the leak and tidying up.
  Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 5:48 PM   #87
Moderator
IronGiant's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford UK
Thanks: Gave 4,168, Got 8,032
Posts: 28,549
It's standard practice to burn off gas at an oil rig unless they are specifically after the gas:

From Wiki: The World Bank estimates that over 150 billion cubic metres of natural gas are flared or vented annually, an amount worth approximately 30.6 billion dollars, equivalent to 25 percent of the United States’ gas consumption or 30 percent of the European Union’s gas consumption per year
  Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 6:15 PM   #88
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Thanks: Gave 97, Got 39
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronGiant View Post
It's standard practice to burn off gas at an oil rig unless they are specifically after the gas:

From Wiki: The World Bank estimates that over 150 billion cubic metres of natural gas are flared or vented annually, an amount worth approximately 30.6 billion dollars, equivalent to 25 percent of the United States’ gas consumption or 30 percent of the European Union’s gas consumption per year
Years ago it was burnt as waste not any more they try and capture it.
In this instant you will be right as the rig was destroyed.
The prime use of a flare stack is as a safety device for venting from other relief valves etc.
  Quote
Thanks from:
IronGiant (08-06-2010)
Old 08-06-2010, 7:39 PM   #89
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan CD View Post
Well said and I quite agree.

However, the American media, newspapers and TV, grab every opportunity to voice indignation and criticism on anything BP, or it's senior representatives, say or do. As such, to outsiders, the American media represent the feelings of the nation. That also includes the President as he has chosen to jump on the bandwagon.

Such righteous indignation caught me by surprise as it was not expected. Everywhere else in the world where such oil spills have taken place its been a case of roll the sleeves up and all hands to the pumps and everyone helps out.

These days it would appear in America that litigation has priority over all else. Stand back and squeeze as much money out of the situation as possible. Fill ya boots boys.

I now view America in a new light.
The same president that cried racist when a black man wouldn't show the police his identification because they received a phone call saying the house was being broken into.

Everyone makes mistakes.

I'm not advocating our practices over here. I don't even watch the news because it's all death and taxes. It's on the air for entertainment, nothing of actual substance. They are all biased as well. News websites, TV media, etc are all on one side of the fence and will report facts with their skewed point of view.

Someone could donate their kidney to someone less fortunate and the republicans would say he did it because he had the choice. The democrats would say he did it because the guy who needed the kidney deserved it. Who gives a crap, the guy/girl is now given a second chance because someone was self-sacrificing, just leave it at that.

Sure the media might be all over BP, but who cares. We'll still be buying oil from them, we'll still come visit your pubs, we'll still consider you allies and brethren. No sense in getting up in arms over "entertainment" put on by idiots who make more money than I could ever dream about.

Sorry for the diatribe but I don't like being associated with assclowns just because I'm American.
  Quote
Thanks from:
Bill Hicks (09-06-2010)
Old 08-06-2010, 7:40 PM   #90
Det Det is offline
Distinguished Member
Det's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Token American
Thanks: Gave 2,399, Got 1,499
Posts: 11,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Hicks View Post
Well said but nothings changed there really!
The US has always been a litigation society.
It's broke and maybe the next President will promise to change it and then do nothing which seems to be the norm lately
  Quote
Post Reply



Thread information and display options
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off