OOOOh points
OK let's see if I can answer them.
1. As I mentioned earlier, it's really hard to strike a balance. A lot of editing goes into each section and it can be hard to know what people want. Shorter or longer - up until now, the response was as long as it was interesting make it long. The interviews with the manufacturers such as Pioneer have been split into 2 parts because there's so much information. Do we want to cut lots down or do people want to REALLY hear what they have to say? I would guess people would choose the later and if the interview is 30 minutes or an hour, that's more than you normally hear from them.
2. The forums has all kinds of areas, from Sky to Phones and we're trying to cover all kinds of things that interest the people here. It's not ALL about Home Cinema for example - a lot of people want to know about mobiles, cameras and so forth. IF we can bring it to you, why not? It's of interest to the people here as we wouldn't have certain subforums dedicated to some of these topics. We're never going to please all the people all the time, but we can ensure it's diverse enough to have something of interest to a lot of the members here.
3. I honestly don't know - I'd need to check
4. With Elm Street, as with all movies, it's subjective. The DTS-ES track is far superior to the Dolby Digital mix I have in my original boxset. I openly stated that I thought that most of the mixes from mono/stereo to 5 or 6.1 are gimmicky at best in the podcast but this I felt wasn't one of them. It's not going to compete with War of the Worlds, which was recorded in a native surround format, but if I had to choose a preference, then the DTS-ES is the one for me. It's the first time in a while that Elm Street has made me jump again - so it's doing something right!
We have a few roundtable discussions coming from the review team in the next few weeks, but I do like your suggestion, so we'll see what we can come up with. Hope that answers your queries and thanks for the feedback.