Okay, firstly kudos to Phil for his comments near the end about the need for quality material first and foremost. Phil, that shouldn't need to be said, but sadly it does - well done.
Secondly, Chris am I the only one who thinks someone is taking the **** by putting a programme on Cbeebies called
Dirt Girl World? What's all that about?
Right, on to the TV discussion. Gentlemen, I take a slightly different view. Have you not noticed what all these programmes have in common?
Lost, Heroes, Battlestar Galactica, Supernatural, and so on. They're almost all sci-fi/fantasy/horror. The few that aren't (
Band of Brothers, The Wire The Sopranos, 24) are violent(ish) crime/war products which are aimed at a similar demographic.
The networks now have more money to throw at these products, due to increased revenues from cable/satellite, overseas markets, and future sales on DVD/BD, as well as the associated commercial off shoots. Subsequently, the dreaded franchise with several sequels appearing every year or two becomes a dreaded franchise with the next instalment appearing next week.
To say they're deeper than many films is merely an acknowledgement that Michael Bay exists. To say they're higher budget is merely an acknowledgment that we don't see moveable cardboard walls on
Star Trek and
Dr.Who anymore.
Talking of
Dr.Who, you didn't - well, hardly at all - and I don't think you mentioned another British TV series. The last decade or so of British TV has seen numerous interesting, intelligent well-written series, from
This Life, through to
Coupling,
Life on Mars, and others.
If I think of Hollywood at its consistent best I think of the period from the late '60's through to the end of the '70's. This was dominated by films that were not genre affairs aimed at people in their late teens/early twenties, but interesting, thoughtful dramas aimed at adults.
Now I'm not saying for a second that the quality of some TV productions hasn't improved, and to be fair some of it is a little more thoughtful than the latest crass blockbuster, but that's damning with faint praise.
Battlestar Galactica is deeper than
Transformers, what isn't, but I still wouldn't call it deep.
Still, that's a
very interesting discussion. Cheers.
Steve W