I was in the process of writting a post in the 'What does sandbox mean' thread, but now see it's closed. I can see why. Anyway, as i was trying to pull together a few things which i wanted to put to Cas, i have created a new thread.
Note, all i really wanted was the opportunity to put this to Cas. When he has read and replied, i'll close this thread. What i am saying is, i don't want to start another thread that turns into what the other one was. So, here's the post...
For those of you who have been lucky enough to follow this thread (

), and its forerunner (the best GTA game thread), I just wanted to put together a brief summary. I think pretty much everyone at this point can see Cas has some issues – sorry Cas, but you seriously do have problems. The manner in which you conduct yourself it beyond poor.
I believe you are around 16-ish, and while that goes someway to explaining your behaviour, you will soon learn the attitude you have shown in this thread is not going to fly in the grown up world. I have no doubt you will come back with a charming reply to this, but I am not the one who’ll be having serious issues in adult life. You will. Unless you can learn to behave and debate properly.
Anyway, off we go…
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 That's the reason no one sells games in the Sandbox genre becasue it's stupid and confusing. |
So no one sells games in the sandbox genre because it’s stupid and confusing. That is your statement.
However, you (and you alone) class sandbox as a game genre. You have stated that before. You even game me a nice list of your top 5 sandbox games. Plus you game me a definition of what a game in the sandbox genre is.
But, the thing is, if no one sells games in the sandbox genre (because it’s stupid and confusing) why are you using sandbox as a genre to define games? You just said it would be stupid to class a games genre as sandbox (hence no one sells games in the sandbox genre), but you have done just that? You are using sandbox to define a genre.
Then you seem to change what you are using the word sandbox for.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 p.s. sandbox isn't a mode it's an evironment. |
So it’s an environment now? Sandbox is an environment. Right? Or is it still a genre like you said before?
No, wait, it’s now definitely an environment, because you say it again…
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 Sandbox is a term used to DESCRIBE the environment in which the game is set. |
So sandbox is a word used to describe the environment the game is set. Right?
So does that mean GTAIII’s genre is sandbox sandbox? ‘Sandbox’ being the genre (as defied and categorised by you), and ‘sandbox’ being used the describe the environment?
That sounds kinda odd. Sandbox sandbox. Hmm.
Oh hang on, now you are saying sandbox is a term to…
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 …describe the games structure and that's all it should be used for. |
So the term sandbox should only be used to describe a games structure? Right? Not the genre? Not the environment the game is set. But the structure of the game? Hmm.
It seems over the course of these conversations, you’ve used the term sandbox to describe a games genre, environment and structure. Those a 3 different things, so how can you be using sandbox for all 3?
From reading what you have said, the following is true of Just Cause…
Genre: Sandbox
Environment: sandbox
Game structure: Sandbox
Hmm, ok. Now I see why no one sells games in the sandbox genre (like you said), because it is confusing.
So why do you (and you alone) use sandbox as a genre?
This is fundamentally where you are out of step without everyone – and by everyone, I mean publishers, developers, gamers, forum members. You seem to move around on what sandbox means to suit yourself. One post sandbox means genre, the next post, sandbox reference to environment. I believe this is why we have had these shenanigans over the last few days. Oh, and the fact that you cannot listen.
Anyway, on we go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 You just said exactly what I said from the beginning, it's a descriptive word and that only, it is not a classification for games, becuase they already have their own genre. Hence the reason why those who do not have a set genre are classed as Sandbox games because the Sandbox is what makes the games various elements come together. |
This is a good one. So, the bit in bold.
‘Sandbox is a descriptive word and that only, it is not a classification for games’
But you said sandbox was a genre, and by definition, genre is a means to classify something, in this case, games?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 A Sandbox game doesn't HAVE to be in third-person, I never said it has to be anything specifically so you must have pulled that out from somewhere dark and dindgy. the whole point in a sanbox game is that it isn't any specific, I thought I had made that clear over the last 72 hours, oh yeah I did. |
Okay, what is an example of a sandbox game that is not set in 3rd person? I would be interested to hear if there is one that you know of?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 Just because a game has something outside it's specific genre does not mean it change it's purpose.
Like I said Fallout 3 is an RPG becuase it has that specific gameplay, Paradise is a driving/racing game becuase it has that gameplay.
GTA is a sandbox game becasue it has everything  |
So close with this one.
Fallout 3 is in the RPG genre. Just as you say.
Burnout P is in the Driving/racing genre. Just as you say.
GTA is in the sandbox genre, oh wait, this is wrong.
GTA is in the 3rd person action/adventure genre.
However, all three of the above games would be further qualified as being set in a sandbox environment. This DOES NOT mean their genre changes. F3 is still an RPG, that is its genre. But F3 is an RPG set in a sandbox environment.
Burnout P, it is a driving/racing game. Driving racing is its genre, but it is a driving/racing genre game, set in a sandbox environment.
GTA, Just Casue etc, those are 3rd person action/adventure genre games, but all have sandbox environments.
And finally, I love this one…
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas398 I've never been known to contradict myself and never will |
You already have. See above.
Making a statement like this just shows everyone what kind of person we are dealing with. This is my last attempt to try and explain to you what 99% of everyone else can see and understand.
