Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Games Guru How do you quantify the power?
The original xbox (correct me if i'm wrong) had 333mhz cpu. The new one has 3x3.2 ghz processors.
So going by that judgement, the revo will look terrible in comparison. |
Ok, seeing as no one could apparently be bothered to go and find info as I suggested, I found it for you all...
Taken from IGN
This bit is important:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shigeru Miyamoto In an interview with IGNcube, Nintendo's Shigeru Miyamoto offered further insight:
"You know, in regard to the power of the Nintendo Revolution versus, say, the Xbox 360, we're looking at making a small, quiet, affordable console," he said. "If you look at trying to incorporate all that, of course we might not have the horsepower that some other companies |
Next Up, we have
Spong.com
With this snippet:
Quote:
|
The report also claims the IBM-developed Broadway CPU is based on the GameCube’s Gekko processor - another reason fans of Sony and Microsoft’s consoles have seized on this opportunity to dub Revolution little more than GameCube 2 with some relish. It is rumoured that the Hollywood GPU is again a revision of existing GameCube hardware, namely the Flipper by ATi. “Basically, take a GameCube, double the clock rate of the CPU and GPU and you're done, says one source,” another claiming that, “The CPU is the same as Gekko with one and a half to two times the performance and improved caching. Our guys experimented with it and think they'll be able to get about twice the performance as GameCube”.
|
Lastly, a little goujon from
GanesIndustry.biz Quote:
|
Last week, our first really solid look at the hardware that developers are working on for Revolution proved that our assumption about the company's intentions was correct. Nintendo is building a system somewhere between two and three times as powerful as GameCube - no parallel processing, no troublesome cutting-edge chips with their inherent manufacturing problems, no next-generation storage devices, no high definition output.
|
Ok, so do I ned to find any more?
It wasn't my intention to slag of the Rev, I'm looking forward to it as much as anyone, I've got a 360, and I'm sincerely hoping that the big N will bring up a NEW dimension to gaming.
So let's get off the pedant attitudes, and discuss like a discussion, instead of throwing out unsubstantiated opinion. Take my comments IN context as opposed to out, and suddenly they make more sense, hmmm?
If people actually read the articles, they will find out WHY nintendo is taking this approach. They feel that the amount of power offered by the Rev will be sufficient to do what they want to do. An approach I agree with. We don't NEED high def graphics to enjoy games, but they can make them nicer. Nintendo seem to think that more development will make better games than raw horsepower.
Again, I agree.